The concept is basic. Put the runner at 1B in motion to avoid potential double plays and also to allow the runner to score on a base hit to the outfield. The batter has 3 balls on him so the reason it has a specific name is to communicate to the batter that he doesn't have to swing as is the case in normal hit and runs.
Here is the conundrum for baseball coaches. Do you risk starting the runner with a 3-1 count? It is a great count to hit in. If the batter gets a ball that he can drive there is a chance that a runner in motion might be able to score on a double or a single that takes the outfielder on an angle. Those are the benefits. But, what if that batter takes a strike and the runner gets thrown out?
Now, a 3-2 count with a man on 1st has become a 3-2 count with the bases empty.
Obviosuly, every decision has a risk/ reward ratio worth considering. I think the variables that go into play here are
1) pitchers command of many pitches
2) batters willingness to swing at something in the zone(how picky are they?)
3) runners speed
The worst scenario is a pitcher that has great command of many pitches, a slow runner and a batter with a picky eye. In this scenario, a strike is likely. Furthermore, the batter may take the pitch because it's a millimeter off the plate and a slow runner would get thrown out.
There are definite moments to start the runner 3-1, but I believe many times the risks far outweigh the rewards.
Monday, March 31, 2008
Sunday, March 30, 2008
Changing lineup against a lefthanded pitcher
I find it comical that coaches submit a consistent lineup all the time without first noting if a lefty or a righty is pitching. The simple fact that lefthanded hitters do not see or hit lefty pitchers often lends merit to the idea of dropping these guys in the batting order.
It very well could be true that some of the teams best hitters are lefthanded hitters. However, are those same lefty hitters the effective batters when a lefty is on the mound.
I contend that you should give serious thought to rearranging a lineup based upon the type of arm that is on the mound. If your leadoff hitter struggles with lefties, maybe move him to the 2 hole, 7 hole or 9 hole. At the least, this gives the lefty a potential bunt option every time up.
One other thing to note. I don't necessarily agree with the professional mindset that you should separate your lefthanded hitters in a lineup. The professional purpose is because of that lefty down in the bullpen. In amateur baeball the bullpen exists in name only. There aren't nearly as many options that exist in professional baseball. However, if a lefty starts on a given day, you certainly don't want to stack a bunch of lefties on top of each other.
I think the lineup switch is something that coaches don't do because players prefer certain lineup spots. Yet, if the ego can be set aside there is deinitely a purpose to switch lefties around.
It very well could be true that some of the teams best hitters are lefthanded hitters. However, are those same lefty hitters the effective batters when a lefty is on the mound.
I contend that you should give serious thought to rearranging a lineup based upon the type of arm that is on the mound. If your leadoff hitter struggles with lefties, maybe move him to the 2 hole, 7 hole or 9 hole. At the least, this gives the lefty a potential bunt option every time up.
One other thing to note. I don't necessarily agree with the professional mindset that you should separate your lefthanded hitters in a lineup. The professional purpose is because of that lefty down in the bullpen. In amateur baeball the bullpen exists in name only. There aren't nearly as many options that exist in professional baseball. However, if a lefty starts on a given day, you certainly don't want to stack a bunch of lefties on top of each other.
I think the lineup switch is something that coaches don't do because players prefer certain lineup spots. Yet, if the ego can be set aside there is deinitely a purpose to switch lefties around.
Saturday, March 29, 2008
The vogue pitch
It seems like every now and then there is a pitch that sweeps the baseball world and becomes popular in pitching circles. Let's see if I can recap certain pitches that become popular.
The first trendsetting pitch(at least one that I can remember being born in 1973) was the split fingered fastball. It seems that in the 1980's this pitch become the popular strike out pitch of its era. Roger Craig was the professed guru of this pitch. He developed it so journeyman pitchers could lengthen their career with a pitch that would drop off the table. Mike Scott of the Houston Astros was probably the most famous of Craig's disciples.
As the 80's became the 90's, Greg Maddux began to dominate baseball and his 2 seam fastball was the pitch of choice. It was literally the epiphany to some pitchers. Maddux seemed to be the first righty pitcher that would throw this 2 seamer in on lefty hitters. Conventional thinking said that you want to throw 4 seamers to lefties so the ball doesn't drift out over the plate. Maddux threw the 2 seamer where it would start at the lefties belt buckle and back up over the inside corner for a strike. This pitch singlehandedly caused "caught looking" strikeouts to rise exponentially in the early 90's and throughout the decade. Hitters would simply give up on the pitch and the ball would run back over the plate for strike 3.
For the early part of this decade, the vogue pitch was the straight change. When hitters became more rotational in their approach it made this great change of speed a much more effective pitch. The Trevor Hoffman's, Johan Santana's and Cole Hamels' have revolutionized this pitch to be a devastating equalizer to the amazing batspeed that is developed by today's premier players. It's effectiveness preys on a hitters aggression.
I'm sure there will be a new "vogue" pitch if there already isn't one. It seems to me that the "power sinker" may be the next pitch that everyone is trying to emulate. Fausto Carmona and Brandon Webb come to mind. We'll see if it can be taught or if Carmona and Webb may just be able to do something that is a little out of the ordinary with their arm action.
Whatever the case, baseball is a copycat sport, and if something is effective it will be become a widespread phenomenon.
The first trendsetting pitch(at least one that I can remember being born in 1973) was the split fingered fastball. It seems that in the 1980's this pitch become the popular strike out pitch of its era. Roger Craig was the professed guru of this pitch. He developed it so journeyman pitchers could lengthen their career with a pitch that would drop off the table. Mike Scott of the Houston Astros was probably the most famous of Craig's disciples.
As the 80's became the 90's, Greg Maddux began to dominate baseball and his 2 seam fastball was the pitch of choice. It was literally the epiphany to some pitchers. Maddux seemed to be the first righty pitcher that would throw this 2 seamer in on lefty hitters. Conventional thinking said that you want to throw 4 seamers to lefties so the ball doesn't drift out over the plate. Maddux threw the 2 seamer where it would start at the lefties belt buckle and back up over the inside corner for a strike. This pitch singlehandedly caused "caught looking" strikeouts to rise exponentially in the early 90's and throughout the decade. Hitters would simply give up on the pitch and the ball would run back over the plate for strike 3.
For the early part of this decade, the vogue pitch was the straight change. When hitters became more rotational in their approach it made this great change of speed a much more effective pitch. The Trevor Hoffman's, Johan Santana's and Cole Hamels' have revolutionized this pitch to be a devastating equalizer to the amazing batspeed that is developed by today's premier players. It's effectiveness preys on a hitters aggression.
I'm sure there will be a new "vogue" pitch if there already isn't one. It seems to me that the "power sinker" may be the next pitch that everyone is trying to emulate. Fausto Carmona and Brandon Webb come to mind. We'll see if it can be taught or if Carmona and Webb may just be able to do something that is a little out of the ordinary with their arm action.
Whatever the case, baseball is a copycat sport, and if something is effective it will be become a widespread phenomenon.
Friday, March 28, 2008
Man on 3rd, <2 outs pick play
When a runner gets to 3B, he is only 90 ft. away from scoring a run. If he is there with less than two outs, there is a likelihood that he will score. Because of this, defenses look to try some different manners to record outs. The pickoff at 3B!
The effectiveness in which this pickoff is run is dependent on the timing of the 3B and the pitcher. In some manner, the pitcher and the 3B must agree that the pickoff play is in fact on. When they decide to attempt the pickoff, the 3B needs to look as inconspicuous as possible. In other words, don't look like you're going to hold the runner close.
As the pitcher lift his leg to ostensibly throw home, the 3B breaks to cover 3B. The pitcher throws to the bag hoping the runner at 3B is getting his secondary lead a little too early. Ball arrives before the runner at 3B and hopefully an out is recorded.
Again, a great time for this pickof is with 0 out. The reason for this is because the risk/ reward ratio is very low. But, it doesn't necessarily mean that there aren't other good times to do this pickoff attempt. A man on 3rd with 1 out is more of a risk but you have something at your advantage. With 1 out, the man at 3B is trying to be more aggressive. He is more than likely going on contact which means he is trying to gain an early advantage with his secondary lead. Take note of his aggression and possibly a pickoff is in order.
There are times when you don't want to try a pick play but when the pitcher is struggling it can definitely be rewarding.
The effectiveness in which this pickoff is run is dependent on the timing of the 3B and the pitcher. In some manner, the pitcher and the 3B must agree that the pickoff play is in fact on. When they decide to attempt the pickoff, the 3B needs to look as inconspicuous as possible. In other words, don't look like you're going to hold the runner close.
As the pitcher lift his leg to ostensibly throw home, the 3B breaks to cover 3B. The pitcher throws to the bag hoping the runner at 3B is getting his secondary lead a little too early. Ball arrives before the runner at 3B and hopefully an out is recorded.
Again, a great time for this pickof is with 0 out. The reason for this is because the risk/ reward ratio is very low. But, it doesn't necessarily mean that there aren't other good times to do this pickoff attempt. A man on 3rd with 1 out is more of a risk but you have something at your advantage. With 1 out, the man at 3B is trying to be more aggressive. He is more than likely going on contact which means he is trying to gain an early advantage with his secondary lead. Take note of his aggression and possibly a pickoff is in order.
There are times when you don't want to try a pick play but when the pitcher is struggling it can definitely be rewarding.
Thursday, March 27, 2008
First step back on a line drive.
Baserunners need to understand that line drives are a difficult read. A base runner gets on base and he concentrates on all the reads that he might have to make based upon the batted ball. He worries about what he does if the ball is hit on the ground. He thinks about what to do if the ball is hit in the air. And he is told "FREEZE ON A LINE DRIVE." Yet, this advice never works. How many times do we see runners get doubled off after a well hit line drive?
Why?
I believe base runners need to be told "first step back after a line drive." When the line drive is hit the instinct is to run. However, with less than two outs there is a good chance you're not going to advance two bases anyway on a hit to the outfield. Why try and get a good jump when there is no reward at the end of the play.
If you're first step is back you take away the chance of getting doubled up. Furthermore, it helps to prevent that early break when you're told to freeze. And, not only will you not get doubled up but you aren't going to get two bases anyway. So, on so many levels going back on the line drive is the prudent piece of advice that base runners need to hear.
I tell base runners all the time " base to base on line drives." This phrase is an attempt to reinforce the idea that we do not want to get a jump with only one base to advance to.
Why?
I believe base runners need to be told "first step back after a line drive." When the line drive is hit the instinct is to run. However, with less than two outs there is a good chance you're not going to advance two bases anyway on a hit to the outfield. Why try and get a good jump when there is no reward at the end of the play.
If you're first step is back you take away the chance of getting doubled up. Furthermore, it helps to prevent that early break when you're told to freeze. And, not only will you not get doubled up but you aren't going to get two bases anyway. So, on so many levels going back on the line drive is the prudent piece of advice that base runners need to hear.
I tell base runners all the time " base to base on line drives." This phrase is an attempt to reinforce the idea that we do not want to get a jump with only one base to advance to.
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
When to use that pinch hitter?
You've got a big stick on the bench. The situation arises where you can insert him into the game for a big opportunity. Be careful. There are definitely certain times when you want to wary of sending him to the plate.
When is such a time? When there is a base open of course.
Here is a situation where you would have to fight the temptation of going to that pinch hitter. Offensive team is down 3-2. First two batters get out. Next batter hits a double and is now in scoring position. Man on 2B with 2 outs. A base hit will score him. Go to your best pinch hitter if need be and see if you can drive that run in. Wrong!
Going to the best pinch hitter in this spot invites an intentional walk and dismisses any opportunity you may have had to use him in the game. Rather, you must hope that another batter can prolong the game long enough by getting on base. Obviously, it would be nice if the current batter would tie the game himsef. However, if the base hit doesn't happen, maybe a walk or a HBP. Only at this time is it really practical to hit the top pinch hitter. Third base is open but it's not the conventional base and there is a good chance the defense will pitch to the top hitter. This is the time to roll the dice.
A very interesting point that I had heard one time. Late in the game, when big hitters are coming to the plate, do not take the extra base so teams can not pitch around the big bat.
I wonder if the player that hits in front of Barry Bonds stopped at 1B more often than normal? My guess would be an emphatic yes!
When is such a time? When there is a base open of course.
Here is a situation where you would have to fight the temptation of going to that pinch hitter. Offensive team is down 3-2. First two batters get out. Next batter hits a double and is now in scoring position. Man on 2B with 2 outs. A base hit will score him. Go to your best pinch hitter if need be and see if you can drive that run in. Wrong!
Going to the best pinch hitter in this spot invites an intentional walk and dismisses any opportunity you may have had to use him in the game. Rather, you must hope that another batter can prolong the game long enough by getting on base. Obviously, it would be nice if the current batter would tie the game himsef. However, if the base hit doesn't happen, maybe a walk or a HBP. Only at this time is it really practical to hit the top pinch hitter. Third base is open but it's not the conventional base and there is a good chance the defense will pitch to the top hitter. This is the time to roll the dice.
A very interesting point that I had heard one time. Late in the game, when big hitters are coming to the plate, do not take the extra base so teams can not pitch around the big bat.
I wonder if the player that hits in front of Barry Bonds stopped at 1B more often than normal? My guess would be an emphatic yes!
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Drop knee catching technique
Catchers have many responsibilities. But, the most important responsibility is the job of receiving pitches and presenting them as strikes.
The strike zone as evolved over the years. Catchers used to almost bend at the knees instead of squatting. Take a look at some old pictures and you'll see catchers "standing" behind home plate. As the catchers have lowered their position, so have the umpires. In turn, the strike zone has become much lower. Gone are the days of the chest high strike.
As the zone become lower, it became an important characteristic of a catcher to get low and work under the ball. As the ball was received it was presented to the umpire as a strike at the knees.
A valuable method that every catcher should at least be aware of is the idea of drop knee catching. This method has the catcher drop his left knee to the ground to lower his center of gravity. This allows the catcher a chance to have his strength underneath the ball so he can work up through the ball presenting a better strike.
The worst thing that could happen to a pitcher is when he throws a strike but the catcher rides it out of the zone just trying to catch the ball. This drop knee technique shortly becomes a pitcher's best friend when implemented correctly.
The one caveat is obviously with a block as an option you must be aware not to drop knee too quickly. The drop knee is primarily a strike presenting position. It can prove dangerous if the catcher drops to a knee prematurely before recognizing if the pitch is in the dirt or not.
The strike zone as evolved over the years. Catchers used to almost bend at the knees instead of squatting. Take a look at some old pictures and you'll see catchers "standing" behind home plate. As the catchers have lowered their position, so have the umpires. In turn, the strike zone has become much lower. Gone are the days of the chest high strike.
As the zone become lower, it became an important characteristic of a catcher to get low and work under the ball. As the ball was received it was presented to the umpire as a strike at the knees.
A valuable method that every catcher should at least be aware of is the idea of drop knee catching. This method has the catcher drop his left knee to the ground to lower his center of gravity. This allows the catcher a chance to have his strength underneath the ball so he can work up through the ball presenting a better strike.
The worst thing that could happen to a pitcher is when he throws a strike but the catcher rides it out of the zone just trying to catch the ball. This drop knee technique shortly becomes a pitcher's best friend when implemented correctly.
The one caveat is obviously with a block as an option you must be aware not to drop knee too quickly. The drop knee is primarily a strike presenting position. It can prove dangerous if the catcher drops to a knee prematurely before recognizing if the pitch is in the dirt or not.
Monday, March 24, 2008
Top spin in batting practice
When watching a team take BP, there is nothing more telling of a hitters bat path then how the ball travels off the bat. Does it travel with backspin or does it take off and quickly descend because of topspin?
Those topspin hitters give away the fact that there barrel is below their hands much too early in the swing. To compensate for this collapsed barrel they roll the barrel to the ball and hit the top of the ball causing topspin. This early barrel collapse will eventually catch up to hitters. They might be able to get away with topspin at low levels of amateur baseball but there is a day coming where the fastball will simply be too much to overcome.
The topspin hitter should be pitched with hard stuff in. Once the hitter becomes aware of the ball in, then the pitcher can go away as the hitter will certainly try and adjust to the inside pitch. However, the topspin hitter has a major hole in his swing. The hole is up and in. As a pitcher, throwing up and in is the best way to exploit this flaw.
The higher you climb the ladder in baseball, the less topspin you see of the bat. Simply put- these players get exposed eventually. It's just a matter of time.
Those topspin hitters give away the fact that there barrel is below their hands much too early in the swing. To compensate for this collapsed barrel they roll the barrel to the ball and hit the top of the ball causing topspin. This early barrel collapse will eventually catch up to hitters. They might be able to get away with topspin at low levels of amateur baseball but there is a day coming where the fastball will simply be too much to overcome.
The topspin hitter should be pitched with hard stuff in. Once the hitter becomes aware of the ball in, then the pitcher can go away as the hitter will certainly try and adjust to the inside pitch. However, the topspin hitter has a major hole in his swing. The hole is up and in. As a pitcher, throwing up and in is the best way to exploit this flaw.
The higher you climb the ladder in baseball, the less topspin you see of the bat. Simply put- these players get exposed eventually. It's just a matter of time.
Sunday, March 23, 2008
Lefthanded pitcher- slide step guy.
What's it mean when a lefthander slide steps to the plate? Why is this manner of delivering the ball only reserved for righthanders? Typically, righthanders try and get the ball to the plate as quickly as possible. They do this to give the catcher an opportunity to throw the runner out. Yet, lefty's typically lift their leg and "hang" as if they are trying to read the base runner's intention.
When a lefty slide steps to the plate it signals to me one of two things.
1) He has a bad pickoff move and would just as soon not show the move. If the lefty never throws to 1B there is a very good possibility that this is true. The effectiveness of a pickoff move is based upon its' similarity to the delivery to home plate. Throwing to 1B with this urgency seems ineffective.
2) He is well schooled in defending the running game. One way for a LHP to stop the running game is to NOT be a hang guy. The only test to see if the pitcher does have the running game in mind is to see his pickoff move. If he has a decent pickoff move, then he intentionally is defending the running game in a very effective manner.
The manner in which the LHP delivers the ball to home plate tells me a lot about that pitcher and maybe that pitcher's coach. If the lefty is a "hang guy" it tells me he just doesn't get it. If he is quick to the plate it tells me he gets it- intentionally or unintentionally. Lastly, if he is quick to the plate yet shows a decently quick move to 1B he should single handedly stifle the running game.
Now, if the offense doesn't go on 1st lift, you can be a "hang guy" all you want.
When a lefty slide steps to the plate it signals to me one of two things.
1) He has a bad pickoff move and would just as soon not show the move. If the lefty never throws to 1B there is a very good possibility that this is true. The effectiveness of a pickoff move is based upon its' similarity to the delivery to home plate. Throwing to 1B with this urgency seems ineffective.
2) He is well schooled in defending the running game. One way for a LHP to stop the running game is to NOT be a hang guy. The only test to see if the pitcher does have the running game in mind is to see his pickoff move. If he has a decent pickoff move, then he intentionally is defending the running game in a very effective manner.
The manner in which the LHP delivers the ball to home plate tells me a lot about that pitcher and maybe that pitcher's coach. If the lefty is a "hang guy" it tells me he just doesn't get it. If he is quick to the plate it tells me he gets it- intentionally or unintentionally. Lastly, if he is quick to the plate yet shows a decently quick move to 1B he should single handedly stifle the running game.
Now, if the offense doesn't go on 1st lift, you can be a "hang guy" all you want.
Saturday, March 22, 2008
Baseball in bad weather
When a game is played in less than ideal conditions it is imperative that the defense understands to get the basic outs. Too many times teams attempt to get more than what they are capable of doing and in the process give up the big inning.
Here are some examples.
1) Don't try for a double play. In ideal conditions it is sometimes difficult to turn a double play. Thinking that a double play is a legitimate option when you can't feel your fingers probably isn't a great idea.
2) Bring the infield in when outs are at a premium. The infield in is designed to field the ball, throw home and apply a tag. All of these variables require perfect execution in ideal conditions, let alone inclement weather. It's probably a better idea to stay back and record as many outs as possible when the weather is bad.
3) Throwing to cutoff men on singles to the outfield. When the weather is bad, the outfielders can't feel their hands either. So, when the ball is hit to them, the chances of coming up and throwing to a cutoff man is improbable. Rather than attempting the throw to the cut man, simply throw it to 2B and keep the double play in order. This allows infielders to make short throws rather than making the long throw across the diamond.
Often times it is the team that makes the least amount of mistakes in bad weather that wins the game. Understanding certain guidelines that could mitigate these mistakes is crucial for a head coach.
Here are some examples.
1) Don't try for a double play. In ideal conditions it is sometimes difficult to turn a double play. Thinking that a double play is a legitimate option when you can't feel your fingers probably isn't a great idea.
2) Bring the infield in when outs are at a premium. The infield in is designed to field the ball, throw home and apply a tag. All of these variables require perfect execution in ideal conditions, let alone inclement weather. It's probably a better idea to stay back and record as many outs as possible when the weather is bad.
3) Throwing to cutoff men on singles to the outfield. When the weather is bad, the outfielders can't feel their hands either. So, when the ball is hit to them, the chances of coming up and throwing to a cutoff man is improbable. Rather than attempting the throw to the cut man, simply throw it to 2B and keep the double play in order. This allows infielders to make short throws rather than making the long throw across the diamond.
Often times it is the team that makes the least amount of mistakes in bad weather that wins the game. Understanding certain guidelines that could mitigate these mistakes is crucial for a head coach.
Friday, March 21, 2008
"Let it go foul."
Balls are hit down the line and instinct is often to allow the ball to go foul. In fact, it's so much of an instinct that I don't believe defensive players even realize the benefits of letting it go foul. It's just become something that they should do. If the ball could go foul- let it go foul.
However, there is a very good reason to allow a ball to go foul. It's simply to prevent the runner from beating out a base hit. But, what if the batter doesn't run?
In a game played last night there was a ball hit close to the foul line and the shortstop (a college bound player) yelled "let it go foul." Meanwhile, the batter that hit the ball was still standing in the batters box.
I contend that sometimes players need to think about why they say what they say. This is one of those times. It's great to let the ball go foul if the batter would have himself an infield single but defensive players would be well served to notice just exactly what the offense is doing.
However, there is a very good reason to allow a ball to go foul. It's simply to prevent the runner from beating out a base hit. But, what if the batter doesn't run?
In a game played last night there was a ball hit close to the foul line and the shortstop (a college bound player) yelled "let it go foul." Meanwhile, the batter that hit the ball was still standing in the batters box.
I contend that sometimes players need to think about why they say what they say. This is one of those times. It's great to let the ball go foul if the batter would have himself an infield single but defensive players would be well served to notice just exactly what the offense is doing.
Thursday, March 20, 2008
1st and 3rd. Run with 1 out or wait?
At lower levels of amateur baseball this question seems almost ridiculous. Why would you wait? The catcher can't throw you out. Steal the base. However, when the catcher's arm becomes something of a option, this is a decision that must be thought out rather carefully.
First and third with 1 out. The runner at 3B can score on a fly ball and on some ground balls. However, the double play looms as a major deterrent for leaving the runner at 1B. If you ask the runner to try and get to 2B you run the risk of the player getting thrown out making the man on 3B less attractive with two outs. Yet, if you leave him at 1B, the double play remains a possibility. Another thought worth considering. By leaving him at 1st with 2 outs, you bring into play many 1st and 3rd possibilities. Coaches are usually more inclined to steal runs with 2 outs in a first and third than with 1 out and a first and third.
What are the variables that help to govern these decisions?
1) The inclination of the batter to ground into double plays.
2) The pitchers ability to induce double plays.
3) The defense behind the pitcher.
4) The speed of the runner at 1st.
5) The importance of the runner at 3rd.
6) The count in which the batter is hitting.
7) How late in the game is it?
8) Has the pitcher or coach demonstrated a fake to third move?
9) The catchers arm strength.
It is such a subtle decision that rages in a coaches mind when coaching at third base. Try and take the double play out of the equation and risk a possible throw out. OR, leave the runner at third with 1 out and hope for a fly out or ground ball that allows the runner to score.
This is one of those beautiful baseball scenarios where an analyst of the game cherishes.
First and third with 1 out. The runner at 3B can score on a fly ball and on some ground balls. However, the double play looms as a major deterrent for leaving the runner at 1B. If you ask the runner to try and get to 2B you run the risk of the player getting thrown out making the man on 3B less attractive with two outs. Yet, if you leave him at 1B, the double play remains a possibility. Another thought worth considering. By leaving him at 1st with 2 outs, you bring into play many 1st and 3rd possibilities. Coaches are usually more inclined to steal runs with 2 outs in a first and third than with 1 out and a first and third.
What are the variables that help to govern these decisions?
1) The inclination of the batter to ground into double plays.
2) The pitchers ability to induce double plays.
3) The defense behind the pitcher.
4) The speed of the runner at 1st.
5) The importance of the runner at 3rd.
6) The count in which the batter is hitting.
7) How late in the game is it?
8) Has the pitcher or coach demonstrated a fake to third move?
9) The catchers arm strength.
It is such a subtle decision that rages in a coaches mind when coaching at third base. Try and take the double play out of the equation and risk a possible throw out. OR, leave the runner at third with 1 out and hope for a fly out or ground ball that allows the runner to score.
This is one of those beautiful baseball scenarios where an analyst of the game cherishes.
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
To slide head first or feet first?
There are obviously different ways to slide into a base. Head first and feet first are the basic ways in which this can be done. When is it proper to use each of these techniques?
When straight stealing, I believe the only true way to steal the base is by sliding head first. A straight steal is designed to beat the ball to the base. The head first slide is the best way to reach the base as quickly as possible. Momentum is not lost by sliding feet first. Furthermore, the head first slide allows the base stealer to use his hands to reach the bag rather than his feet which he has much less control over.
The feet first slide is used in a beat the force situation where the runner must see the play in front of him. The ball is hit on the ground and the runner slides feet first with his eyes up so he can see if the play is in fact made on him. If the throw is elsewhere the runner sliding feet first needs to see if he can advance. Advancing is easier if you slide feet first.
The simple rule of thumb is- if you think you possibly advance another base after the play is finished then you should slide feet first. If your goal is simply to get to the next base as quickly as possible then the head first slide is the way to go.
When straight stealing, I believe the only true way to steal the base is by sliding head first. A straight steal is designed to beat the ball to the base. The head first slide is the best way to reach the base as quickly as possible. Momentum is not lost by sliding feet first. Furthermore, the head first slide allows the base stealer to use his hands to reach the bag rather than his feet which he has much less control over.
The feet first slide is used in a beat the force situation where the runner must see the play in front of him. The ball is hit on the ground and the runner slides feet first with his eyes up so he can see if the play is in fact made on him. If the throw is elsewhere the runner sliding feet first needs to see if he can advance. Advancing is easier if you slide feet first.
The simple rule of thumb is- if you think you possibly advance another base after the play is finished then you should slide feet first. If your goal is simply to get to the next base as quickly as possible then the head first slide is the way to go.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Pitcher- what pitch to grip?
When the pitcher gets the ball to start his delivery, he needs to grab the ball in preparation to throw it or maybe attempt a pickoff. So, how should he grab the ball?
Conventional thinking says grab the hardest pitch to grab in your arsenal. If you throw a split- grab it. If you throw a change- grab it. Whatever takes the longest amount of time to sink in that's the pitch you should start with.
However, I've come to think lately that the pitcher should always grab a four seam fastball grip on the mound. The reason? The pitcher might have to attempt a pickoff rather than throwing home. The pickoff attempt could come quickly depending on whether or not the runner takes off quickly. Furthermore, if the pitcher is throwing out of the stretch and the catcher asks for a quick pick then it is definitely prudent to have a four seam grip.
With a four seam grip, most pitchers will be changing their grip on every single pitch. This isn't a bad thing. You either want to "dig" on every pitch or resist digging on any pitch. This four seam grip seems to be the most efficient method in which to accomplish deceiving the batter.
Conventional thinking says grab the hardest pitch to grab in your arsenal. If you throw a split- grab it. If you throw a change- grab it. Whatever takes the longest amount of time to sink in that's the pitch you should start with.
However, I've come to think lately that the pitcher should always grab a four seam fastball grip on the mound. The reason? The pitcher might have to attempt a pickoff rather than throwing home. The pickoff attempt could come quickly depending on whether or not the runner takes off quickly. Furthermore, if the pitcher is throwing out of the stretch and the catcher asks for a quick pick then it is definitely prudent to have a four seam grip.
With a four seam grip, most pitchers will be changing their grip on every single pitch. This isn't a bad thing. You either want to "dig" on every pitch or resist digging on any pitch. This four seam grip seems to be the most efficient method in which to accomplish deceiving the batter.
Monday, March 17, 2008
Pitchers and elbows
The elbow is the most common injury in youth pitchers. I've always felt helpless when a pitcher points to his elbow and says it hurts here - pointing to the inside of his elbow. Well, I'm still not an expert but I feel I've researched this enough to speak intelligently about it. Here goes.
Elbow injuries occur when the arm gets in a vulnerable position during the pitching delivery. Imagine arm wrestling someone. The strongest position possible is one where the body is near the arm. A vulnerable position is when the arm works away from the arm. As a pitcher, wanting the arm in a strong position near the body is critical. How do we do this?
Dr. James Andrews and Dr. Glenn Fleisig have diagnosed the two primary times in a pitchers motion where injuries occur. These times are at the initial acceleration phase of the delivery and at release point. The initial acceleration phase is when the arm actually starts to work forward. The ball instantly and violently turns in the direction of home plate. The release point is easier to understand. It is when the ball literally exits the pitchers hand. So, if this is when injuries occur, how do we prevent injuries?
Lets go back to that arm wrestling analogy. When you begin to win an arm wrestling match your arm pronates as it takes your opponent to defeat. When you lose, your arm suppinates as your opponent takes you to the table. The idea for a pitcher is to maintain pronation in favor of suppination during these two moments in time.
When the pitcher begins his initial acceleration phase it is absolutely critical that his torso be back and in a strong position. If the torso begins to drift away from the rubber the arm will attempt to catch up and will suppinate early to do so. The torso must remain back as the hips and legs begin their drive to the plate. This "staying back" allows the arm to stay connected to the torso and pronate at initial acceleration phase.
What does pronate at initial acceleration look like? When the shoulders start to turn the elbow should drop under the shoulder and the palm of the hand should marry the direction of the chest. If the palm starts to open to home plate faster than the chest- thats early suppination and big trouble.
The second time in the delivery where the pitcher is vulnerable is at release. Every pitcher pronates at release. However, some pitches allow the elbow to pronate easier than others. The fastball, change up and the curveball make for easy pronation. Whereas the slider and the cutter put the elbow in a precarious spot.
Doctors refer to this stress on the elbow as valgus stress. Valgus stress directly relates to suppination of the elbow. Keeping an eye on these stresses is critical to maintaining proper perspective.
Elbow injuries occur when the arm gets in a vulnerable position during the pitching delivery. Imagine arm wrestling someone. The strongest position possible is one where the body is near the arm. A vulnerable position is when the arm works away from the arm. As a pitcher, wanting the arm in a strong position near the body is critical. How do we do this?
Dr. James Andrews and Dr. Glenn Fleisig have diagnosed the two primary times in a pitchers motion where injuries occur. These times are at the initial acceleration phase of the delivery and at release point. The initial acceleration phase is when the arm actually starts to work forward. The ball instantly and violently turns in the direction of home plate. The release point is easier to understand. It is when the ball literally exits the pitchers hand. So, if this is when injuries occur, how do we prevent injuries?
Lets go back to that arm wrestling analogy. When you begin to win an arm wrestling match your arm pronates as it takes your opponent to defeat. When you lose, your arm suppinates as your opponent takes you to the table. The idea for a pitcher is to maintain pronation in favor of suppination during these two moments in time.
When the pitcher begins his initial acceleration phase it is absolutely critical that his torso be back and in a strong position. If the torso begins to drift away from the rubber the arm will attempt to catch up and will suppinate early to do so. The torso must remain back as the hips and legs begin their drive to the plate. This "staying back" allows the arm to stay connected to the torso and pronate at initial acceleration phase.
What does pronate at initial acceleration look like? When the shoulders start to turn the elbow should drop under the shoulder and the palm of the hand should marry the direction of the chest. If the palm starts to open to home plate faster than the chest- thats early suppination and big trouble.
The second time in the delivery where the pitcher is vulnerable is at release. Every pitcher pronates at release. However, some pitches allow the elbow to pronate easier than others. The fastball, change up and the curveball make for easy pronation. Whereas the slider and the cutter put the elbow in a precarious spot.
Doctors refer to this stress on the elbow as valgus stress. Valgus stress directly relates to suppination of the elbow. Keeping an eye on these stresses is critical to maintaining proper perspective.
Sunday, March 16, 2008
Runner goes and ball is in the dirt.
When a runner takes off and the pitcher throws a dirt ball, how should the catcher react? Should he try and pick it and throw the runner out? Or, should he block the pitch and concede the stolen base?
Well, the school of thought is dependent if there is a runner on 3B or not. Quite simply, if the runner breaks the catcher should attempt to throw him out. Regardless of the depth of the backstop the chance of a runner stealing 2B and continuing onto third base is minimal. So, if there is no risk of missing a pick of the ball - go for it. Yet, the reward is great. If the catcher can pick the ball clean there is a chance to record the out at 2B.
Now, if there is a runner at 3B, the risk is very high. The catcher must block all dirt balls regardless of the runners intentions at first base.
This is one of those situations where the catcher must be alert and tuned into what is occuring on the bases. The catcher can not get so wrapped up in the "runner" call that he forgets that a runner is on 3B.
Well, the school of thought is dependent if there is a runner on 3B or not. Quite simply, if the runner breaks the catcher should attempt to throw him out. Regardless of the depth of the backstop the chance of a runner stealing 2B and continuing onto third base is minimal. So, if there is no risk of missing a pick of the ball - go for it. Yet, the reward is great. If the catcher can pick the ball clean there is a chance to record the out at 2B.
Now, if there is a runner at 3B, the risk is very high. The catcher must block all dirt balls regardless of the runners intentions at first base.
This is one of those situations where the catcher must be alert and tuned into what is occuring on the bases. The catcher can not get so wrapped up in the "runner" call that he forgets that a runner is on 3B.
Saturday, March 15, 2008
1st and 2nd. Should the trail runner always follow
In a first and second situation, there is a chance that the lead runner could steal 3B. And, he could do this on his own. He could steal the base because of a poorly prepared 3B. He could steal the base because of a one looking pitcher. He could steal the base because the middle infielders simply refuse to hold him close. Whatever the case, should the trail runner be compelled to follow him?
No.
There is simply too much coordination of this process to make this a viable option. The trail runner is worrying about his primary, his secondary, a catcher's snap throw back to the bag. How his he to account for all of these things and also watch the lead runner. He can't.
Furthermore, if the catcher has a sign on that allows him to throw the trail runner out rather than the lead runner on a double steal it would negate the efficacy of the lead runner's extra base.
All things considered, I think when the lead runner steals the base in a situation where the trail runner isn't necessarily expecting it, the trail runner must remain at 1B.
There are exceptions to this rule but expecting a trail runner to do this seems unreasonable to me.
No.
There is simply too much coordination of this process to make this a viable option. The trail runner is worrying about his primary, his secondary, a catcher's snap throw back to the bag. How his he to account for all of these things and also watch the lead runner. He can't.
Furthermore, if the catcher has a sign on that allows him to throw the trail runner out rather than the lead runner on a double steal it would negate the efficacy of the lead runner's extra base.
All things considered, I think when the lead runner steals the base in a situation where the trail runner isn't necessarily expecting it, the trail runner must remain at 1B.
There are exceptions to this rule but expecting a trail runner to do this seems unreasonable to me.
Friday, March 14, 2008
Pitching to hitters with the "4 hole" open
Hitters should have a plan every time they step in the batters box. Sometimes those plans are more clearly defined than other times. One of those times is when the 1B is holding the runner on 1B and the 2B is in double play depth. This open a gigantic hole between 1st and 2nd. The pitcher and the pitching coach must consider this when calling and throwing certain pitches.
The first point of emphasis is if a left handed batter is in the batters box. The lefty is usually considered the most dangerous batter to hit the ball through that hole. This is for the simple fact that the batter could be out in front of the pitch and rollover a ball and earn a base hit. So, as a pitcher, what pitches would give the batter an opportunity to rollover and get a cheap base hit. THE CHANGEUP. The changeup must be thought of prudently with a lefty hitter in the box. A simple rollover could prove dangerous if the "4 hole" is exposed.
If a righthanded batter is hitting, a changeup has better chance of serving a good purpose. The righty usually takes advantage of that hole on a fastball away or an inside out swing where he has obvious intent to hit the ball through the "4 hole." In amateur baseball most hitters won't consciously think hit it through the "4 hole." In fact, I believe amateur hitters should not think about this.
What's this mean? It means lefty hitters prove more dangerous than righthanders when 1B is occupied because of that "4 hole."
You obviously can't pitch to a batter afraid of the fact that he has a big hole to hit the ball through. However, understanding that a hole does exist should provide a better understanding of how to pitch to each and every batter.
The first point of emphasis is if a left handed batter is in the batters box. The lefty is usually considered the most dangerous batter to hit the ball through that hole. This is for the simple fact that the batter could be out in front of the pitch and rollover a ball and earn a base hit. So, as a pitcher, what pitches would give the batter an opportunity to rollover and get a cheap base hit. THE CHANGEUP. The changeup must be thought of prudently with a lefty hitter in the box. A simple rollover could prove dangerous if the "4 hole" is exposed.
If a righthanded batter is hitting, a changeup has better chance of serving a good purpose. The righty usually takes advantage of that hole on a fastball away or an inside out swing where he has obvious intent to hit the ball through the "4 hole." In amateur baseball most hitters won't consciously think hit it through the "4 hole." In fact, I believe amateur hitters should not think about this.
What's this mean? It means lefty hitters prove more dangerous than righthanders when 1B is occupied because of that "4 hole."
You obviously can't pitch to a batter afraid of the fact that he has a big hole to hit the ball through. However, understanding that a hole does exist should provide a better understanding of how to pitch to each and every batter.
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Man on 2B, forced vs. not forced
When a runner is at 2B and less than two outs, the 3B coach should consider whether or not he is forced. This situation affects the chances of the runner being waved home vs. holding him at 3B.
A 3B coach must anticipate base hits to the outfield and what read the runner at 2nd base has. If the runner has a trail runner behind him then he is off as soon as the ball is hit on the ground. However, if he is not forced, the ball in front of him must get through before he can advance to 3B. Understanding this definitely affects the decision of the 3B coach.
When a runner gets to 2B, I yell "know your rules." This communicates to the runner that he should concentrate on what "reads" he has on ground balls. Just worrying about a "read" means that your break will be slower and not nearly as fast as a forced situation.
This idea of forced or not forced definitely impacts the 3B thinking about waving a runner or not waving a runner. This is one of those thoughts that pops up when you are a 3B coach and maybe not before.
A 3B coach must anticipate base hits to the outfield and what read the runner at 2nd base has. If the runner has a trail runner behind him then he is off as soon as the ball is hit on the ground. However, if he is not forced, the ball in front of him must get through before he can advance to 3B. Understanding this definitely affects the decision of the 3B coach.
When a runner gets to 2B, I yell "know your rules." This communicates to the runner that he should concentrate on what "reads" he has on ground balls. Just worrying about a "read" means that your break will be slower and not nearly as fast as a forced situation.
This idea of forced or not forced definitely impacts the 3B thinking about waving a runner or not waving a runner. This is one of those thoughts that pops up when you are a 3B coach and maybe not before.
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
LHP vs. RHP affect your bunt coverage?
When you think about what bunt coverage you want to put on, should the handedness of the pitcher affect your call? I think it should a little.
Bunt coverages usually are called when there are force situation for the base runners. The base runners must run and the defense puts on a defense that is designed to record an out somewhere. This defense could be aggressive and get the lead runner or it could be passive and get the trail runner. Whatever the case, the handedness of the pitcher should at least be considered when putting on a play.
Here's what I'm talking about.
Men on 1st and 2nd. The defense calls for the LHP to cover the 3B line on the bunt because the 3B is trying to hold his ground. If the 3B is trying to hold we want an out at 3B if at all possible. The LHP falls off to the left side of the mound making this a very reasonable bunt coverage for him. The RHP, on the other hand, has a very difficult task of getting to that same ball. He is falling off to the 1B side making his assignment much more arduous.
Man on 1st. An aggressive bunt coverage involves the 1B driving the runner back to 1B. The pitcher is asked to cover the 1B line on this bunt defense. If the pitcher is a LHP he will more than likely have a difficult time getting to the 1B line to field his position. The RHP has a much easier time of it.
Should knowing this affect the manner in which you call your bunt coverages? Possibly. Especially if the pitcher isn't a great athlete on top of it. If he has further ground to cover and isn't able to cover it quickly he definitely can make it into a harder play.
Bunt coverages usually are called when there are force situation for the base runners. The base runners must run and the defense puts on a defense that is designed to record an out somewhere. This defense could be aggressive and get the lead runner or it could be passive and get the trail runner. Whatever the case, the handedness of the pitcher should at least be considered when putting on a play.
Here's what I'm talking about.
Men on 1st and 2nd. The defense calls for the LHP to cover the 3B line on the bunt because the 3B is trying to hold his ground. If the 3B is trying to hold we want an out at 3B if at all possible. The LHP falls off to the left side of the mound making this a very reasonable bunt coverage for him. The RHP, on the other hand, has a very difficult task of getting to that same ball. He is falling off to the 1B side making his assignment much more arduous.
Man on 1st. An aggressive bunt coverage involves the 1B driving the runner back to 1B. The pitcher is asked to cover the 1B line on this bunt defense. If the pitcher is a LHP he will more than likely have a difficult time getting to the 1B line to field his position. The RHP has a much easier time of it.
Should knowing this affect the manner in which you call your bunt coverages? Possibly. Especially if the pitcher isn't a great athlete on top of it. If he has further ground to cover and isn't able to cover it quickly he definitely can make it into a harder play.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Stealing signals from 1B
Most signals are stolen from 2B. The base runner takes his lead and peers into the catcher and notices the signal that has been given. However, if practiced, you can also steal signals from 1B. This technique is definitely harder and needs practiced repeatedly to become competent at it.
The runner at 1B gets his sign early. This is very important so he can get his lead early. Once the runner has his sign, he can begin to walk off the bag with his lead. The runner attempts to glance into the catcher without turning his head. He shifts his eyes to the left and attempts to notice whether or not the catcher has placed a curveball or a changeup down.
If an offspeed pitch is called, the runner should have a better chance at stealing. Gaining this advantage is predicated upon getting an early sign and extending the lead so the runner has a chance of seeing the sign that is placed.
Is it dangerous? Absolutely, if the runner isn't competent at peering in with his eyes rather than turning his head.
One last thought here. The 1B coach must be absolutely ready to assist in case the runner is peering in. Also, the idea of stealing signals at 1B is very difficult vs. a LHP. The lefty is staring directly at the base runner who is taking his lead.
Every now and again you'll be watching a game and you'll see the base stealer peek in attempting to steal the signal from the catcher.
The runner at 1B gets his sign early. This is very important so he can get his lead early. Once the runner has his sign, he can begin to walk off the bag with his lead. The runner attempts to glance into the catcher without turning his head. He shifts his eyes to the left and attempts to notice whether or not the catcher has placed a curveball or a changeup down.
If an offspeed pitch is called, the runner should have a better chance at stealing. Gaining this advantage is predicated upon getting an early sign and extending the lead so the runner has a chance of seeing the sign that is placed.
Is it dangerous? Absolutely, if the runner isn't competent at peering in with his eyes rather than turning his head.
One last thought here. The 1B coach must be absolutely ready to assist in case the runner is peering in. Also, the idea of stealing signals at 1B is very difficult vs. a LHP. The lefty is staring directly at the base runner who is taking his lead.
Every now and again you'll be watching a game and you'll see the base stealer peek in attempting to steal the signal from the catcher.
Monday, March 10, 2008
Bunt and run with 0 outs vs. 1 out
The hit and run is a glorified bunt. It's primary purpose is to advance the runner into scoring position. Anything more is just "gravy." But, the bunt and run is a little different in that regard. The bunt and run with a runner on 1st is designed to move the runner to 3B. The runner gets a good break and the ball is bunted at the 3B. The runner anticipates the throw to 1B and proceeds to 3B. Is this play worth running with 1 out?
I guess you could summarize the question with this simple point - can the batter beat the bunt out?
If there is a better chance than not that he will be thrown out, then you definitely don't want to bunt and run with 1 out. The batter will more than likely be thrown out at 1B for the 2nd out. This makes the runner going to 3B a very risky proposition.
Again, we never make the 1st or 3rd out at 3B. The last thing the coach wants to do is make this play a burden on the baserunner. Why would we start the runner and ask him to make it to 3B if there are 2 outs at the time? We wouldn't. So, the thought of the bunt and run with 1 out needs to be weighed vs. the batter beating out his bunt for a hit.
Another caveat- the bunt and run is not designed to be treated like a bunt for a hit. The batter squares late but puts the ball down in the direction of the 3B. The primary concern here is to make sure the ball is bunted. This makes it even more unlikely that the batter will beat out the bunt.
This is certainly a esoteric concept but one that needs considered when deciding if the bunt and run is a legitimate option.
I guess you could summarize the question with this simple point - can the batter beat the bunt out?
If there is a better chance than not that he will be thrown out, then you definitely don't want to bunt and run with 1 out. The batter will more than likely be thrown out at 1B for the 2nd out. This makes the runner going to 3B a very risky proposition.
Again, we never make the 1st or 3rd out at 3B. The last thing the coach wants to do is make this play a burden on the baserunner. Why would we start the runner and ask him to make it to 3B if there are 2 outs at the time? We wouldn't. So, the thought of the bunt and run with 1 out needs to be weighed vs. the batter beating out his bunt for a hit.
Another caveat- the bunt and run is not designed to be treated like a bunt for a hit. The batter squares late but puts the ball down in the direction of the 3B. The primary concern here is to make sure the ball is bunted. This makes it even more unlikely that the batter will beat out the bunt.
This is certainly a esoteric concept but one that needs considered when deciding if the bunt and run is a legitimate option.
Sunday, March 9, 2008
Straight steal- should the runner peek or not?
When stealing 2B, the batter may or may not swing. Do you ask your base stealer to check on the batter or do you simply ask him to stay focused on the bag and worry about the batted ball later?
I have seen base stealers so intent on stealing the bag that they forget that the ball actually might get hit. If they are intent on stealing and then don't know where the ball is they must get in the habit of checking their 3rd base coach for some help. If they are not going to check the 3rd base coach they absolutely need to check the batter when they are running. It is imperative on a steal that they know where the ball is. Obviously, if the middle infielders are there to apply a tag the ball was received by the catcher. But, that doesn't always happen. You need to have a backup plan.
Sometimes a backup plan is not needed. That is, if the batter has a take of some kind. The base stealer would know beforehand if this sign is given. If he knows the batter is not swinging- he can simply keep his eyes on the prize and steal 2B.
Most times when the stolen base is practiced the possible consequences are not. It's important to practice all contingencies of the stolen base.
I have seen base stealers so intent on stealing the bag that they forget that the ball actually might get hit. If they are intent on stealing and then don't know where the ball is they must get in the habit of checking their 3rd base coach for some help. If they are not going to check the 3rd base coach they absolutely need to check the batter when they are running. It is imperative on a steal that they know where the ball is. Obviously, if the middle infielders are there to apply a tag the ball was received by the catcher. But, that doesn't always happen. You need to have a backup plan.
Sometimes a backup plan is not needed. That is, if the batter has a take of some kind. The base stealer would know beforehand if this sign is given. If he knows the batter is not swinging- he can simply keep his eyes on the prize and steal 2B.
Most times when the stolen base is practiced the possible consequences are not. It's important to practice all contingencies of the stolen base.
Saturday, March 8, 2008
A philosophy difference with pro vs. amateur pitchers
Our Red Land High School baseball team had a chance to listen to Mike Buddie speak about pitching. He said that when he really learned to pitch is when someone convinced him that the key to being a successful pitcher is getting the batter out of the batters box in 4 pitches or less. This speaks to the fact of not being afraid of contact. Many pitchers run deep counts because they are fearful of the batter hitting the ball hard that is thrown out over the plate.
Is this sound philosophy at amateur levels?
I think it is sound philosophy to not be afraid of contact. Being afraid of contact entices the base on balls and big innings. But, should an amateur pitcher be trying to get the batter out of the batters box in 4 pitches or less? I think an amateur pitcher who thinks like this is going to run into some trouble.
Here's why.
The higher you move up in professional baseball your teammates improve behind you. In pro baseball, your defenders simply have more speed, more arm strength and overall more ability. Attempting to involve them in the play seems like solid logic. However, at amateur levels the good players are not as plentiful. Usually, the pitcher and the catcher are the two best players. At least, two of the better players. Furthermore, the good high school pitcher can't help the fact that his good pitches don't get hit. I mean if you throw 84, 85 and no one can hit it you're going to run deep counts and strike batters out. i don't think this particular pitcher would want to think "contact" with the batter.
Let's discuss another very important point. At professional levels, the fields that players play on are dramatically different. The professional baseball field is well kept and ground balls that are hit- usually hold their line and bounce true. Not necessarily true with amateur baseball.
I know my high school players hung on every word that Mike said. Good thing too! Mike said some great things that definitely helped my program. However, I think it's important to understand some limitations that exist at lower levels of baseball.
Is this sound philosophy at amateur levels?
I think it is sound philosophy to not be afraid of contact. Being afraid of contact entices the base on balls and big innings. But, should an amateur pitcher be trying to get the batter out of the batters box in 4 pitches or less? I think an amateur pitcher who thinks like this is going to run into some trouble.
Here's why.
The higher you move up in professional baseball your teammates improve behind you. In pro baseball, your defenders simply have more speed, more arm strength and overall more ability. Attempting to involve them in the play seems like solid logic. However, at amateur levels the good players are not as plentiful. Usually, the pitcher and the catcher are the two best players. At least, two of the better players. Furthermore, the good high school pitcher can't help the fact that his good pitches don't get hit. I mean if you throw 84, 85 and no one can hit it you're going to run deep counts and strike batters out. i don't think this particular pitcher would want to think "contact" with the batter.
Let's discuss another very important point. At professional levels, the fields that players play on are dramatically different. The professional baseball field is well kept and ground balls that are hit- usually hold their line and bounce true. Not necessarily true with amateur baseball.
I know my high school players hung on every word that Mike said. Good thing too! Mike said some great things that definitely helped my program. However, I think it's important to understand some limitations that exist at lower levels of baseball.
Friday, March 7, 2008
When does the starting pitcher warm up?
The concept of warming up to start the game is a tricky one. The nerves of the starting pitcher are very real and sometimes it feels like they just can't wait anymore. However, it is critically important as to when the starting pitcher goes down to the bullpen to begin his pre-game preparation.
If the pitcher is a member of the visiting team he needs to understand that his team will take the field 2nd. Despite the fact that he wants to get the nervous energy out he should wait until at least 20 minutes prior to 1st pitch before going to the bullpen. The visiting pitcher must take into consideration the fact that his team will be hitting in the top of the 1st as well. This additional time must be accounted for. Neglecting this issue is a common fault of starting pitchers in amateur baseball. They simply are not prepared to handle the 1st inning.
Pitchers are creatures of habit. They want to go warm up at the same time every time. However, that habit needs to be dependent on whether he is pitching on the home side or the visiting side.
If the pitcher is a member of the visiting team he needs to understand that his team will take the field 2nd. Despite the fact that he wants to get the nervous energy out he should wait until at least 20 minutes prior to 1st pitch before going to the bullpen. The visiting pitcher must take into consideration the fact that his team will be hitting in the top of the 1st as well. This additional time must be accounted for. Neglecting this issue is a common fault of starting pitchers in amateur baseball. They simply are not prepared to handle the 1st inning.
Pitchers are creatures of habit. They want to go warm up at the same time every time. However, that habit needs to be dependent on whether he is pitching on the home side or the visiting side.
Thursday, March 6, 2008
1st and 2nd bunt situation. C needs to ...
understand aggressive vs. passive defenses. Every team should have their 1st and 2nd bunt defenses with 0 out. These bunt defenses are designed for certain purposes. Some are very aggressive, some are passive. Whatever the bunt defense, the catcher should have a very good understanding of what it is the coach is trying to accomplish.
The basic bunt defense is designed to get an out. This defense is not a high risk proposition and the catcher must understand that an out is needed. If the ball is bunted the defense should be thinking throw A runner out. It doesn't necessarily mean the lead runner. In fact, it very likely means the trail runner.
More aggressive bunt defenses should give the catcher a pre-conceived notion of getting the lead runner out on bunted balls. This doesn't always work out this way but the catcher needs to be thinking "3,3,3,3" on the bunted ball. Whether the bunt defense is the "wheel" play or the "flash" play there are risks being taken by moving middle infielders out of position. If infielders are out of position there better be a carrot on the other end. That carrot is the lead runner. The catcher must be perfectly clear in understanding this concept.
The best laid plans can be destroyed by a faulty thinking catcher. In order for those bunt defenses to function efficiently, the catcher (the voice) must be able to finalize the play.
I have a saying that I like to use- IT'S BETTER TO BE LOUD AND WRONG THAN RIGHT AND QUIET. When it comes to communicating your bunt defenses to a catcher the more he knows- the better chance he is loud and RIGHT.
The basic bunt defense is designed to get an out. This defense is not a high risk proposition and the catcher must understand that an out is needed. If the ball is bunted the defense should be thinking throw A runner out. It doesn't necessarily mean the lead runner. In fact, it very likely means the trail runner.
More aggressive bunt defenses should give the catcher a pre-conceived notion of getting the lead runner out on bunted balls. This doesn't always work out this way but the catcher needs to be thinking "3,3,3,3" on the bunted ball. Whether the bunt defense is the "wheel" play or the "flash" play there are risks being taken by moving middle infielders out of position. If infielders are out of position there better be a carrot on the other end. That carrot is the lead runner. The catcher must be perfectly clear in understanding this concept.
The best laid plans can be destroyed by a faulty thinking catcher. In order for those bunt defenses to function efficiently, the catcher (the voice) must be able to finalize the play.
I have a saying that I like to use- IT'S BETTER TO BE LOUD AND WRONG THAN RIGHT AND QUIET. When it comes to communicating your bunt defenses to a catcher the more he knows- the better chance he is loud and RIGHT.
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
Watch the outfield arms in pre-game warmups
There are a lot of things that go on prior to the first pitch of a game. One of the hardest things to do is occupy a teams focus when they are in the dugout with nervous energy. They have taken BP. They have taken infield outfield. They just want to get after it.
But, I think one thing of note is the arm strength that opposing outfielders have. It's important to know where the strong arm outfielders are. This is especially true if a coaches philosophy is to allow them to make their own baserunning decisions. I suppose that philosophy actually dictates whether or not a player needs knowledge of his opponents arms.
If a coach espouses the opinion that all runners should know their speed, the angle the outfielder takes to the ball, the number of outs- the last important variable that needs considered is "how strong is the outfielder's arm?" If the runner knows as much as possible- then informed decisions can be made.
It takes some time to observe these arms but in my mind it is time well spent. Now, if the opposing team doesn't show off the outfielder arms then that is a different story. In fact, maybe that's for another blogging.
But, I think one thing of note is the arm strength that opposing outfielders have. It's important to know where the strong arm outfielders are. This is especially true if a coaches philosophy is to allow them to make their own baserunning decisions. I suppose that philosophy actually dictates whether or not a player needs knowledge of his opponents arms.
If a coach espouses the opinion that all runners should know their speed, the angle the outfielder takes to the ball, the number of outs- the last important variable that needs considered is "how strong is the outfielder's arm?" If the runner knows as much as possible- then informed decisions can be made.
It takes some time to observe these arms but in my mind it is time well spent. Now, if the opposing team doesn't show off the outfielder arms then that is a different story. In fact, maybe that's for another blogging.
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
Backing up bases and knowing "your priority"
One of the details that a pitcher must be aware of is the idea of "knowing your priority" in 1st and 3rd situations. Well, if you have a priority, it should dictate not only what you are permitted to do with your throws but where you go to back up after your throws.
Let's discuss in more detail.
If your priority is the trail runner in a 1st and 3rd situation, you could be attempting pickoffs at 1B. If a pickoff attempt is made there should be a focus on getting that out. The pitcher should run behind first base in case of a rundown. Typically, the pitcher would go between 1st and 3rd and read the direction of the play. However, when the priority is known there is no need to worry about going behind home plate as a throw should not be made in that direction.
If the runner breaks early and the pitcher chases towards 2B, it is very important for the 2B to recognize that and go to backup 1B. In this scenario, the pitcher would backup 2B as the rundown would guarantee a backup at each base.
Now, if the priority is 3B and a pickoff attempt ensues, the pitcher would always go and backup home plate. The shortstop would rotate over to back up the 3B. This goes against some logical school of thought where you follow your throw.
The knowing your priority is a very obscure concept but it holds a lot of merit- especially in amateur baseball where arm strength merits it.
Let's discuss in more detail.
If your priority is the trail runner in a 1st and 3rd situation, you could be attempting pickoffs at 1B. If a pickoff attempt is made there should be a focus on getting that out. The pitcher should run behind first base in case of a rundown. Typically, the pitcher would go between 1st and 3rd and read the direction of the play. However, when the priority is known there is no need to worry about going behind home plate as a throw should not be made in that direction.
If the runner breaks early and the pitcher chases towards 2B, it is very important for the 2B to recognize that and go to backup 1B. In this scenario, the pitcher would backup 2B as the rundown would guarantee a backup at each base.
Now, if the priority is 3B and a pickoff attempt ensues, the pitcher would always go and backup home plate. The shortstop would rotate over to back up the 3B. This goes against some logical school of thought where you follow your throw.
The knowing your priority is a very obscure concept but it holds a lot of merit- especially in amateur baseball where arm strength merits it.
Monday, March 3, 2008
Why hasn't anyone taught the changeup correctly?
I shouldn't be so absolute with my title. I'm sure someone out there is talking about some critical elements to the change. But, I have yet to hear a pitching coach discuss thoughts that seem so obvious. I'm guilty myself. I've always talked about what appear to be ancillary issues with respect to stealing MPH off the change.
Studies have been done that suggest that the best way to rob MPH from a pitch is to prevent the core from playing a significant role in the delivery.
Consider this. The legs and the core create the greatest forces available to throwing a ball with considerable velocity. Sure, it's the arm that throws the ball but it seems that the arm is a difficult variable to change with mechanics. You throw the way you throw. But, you can change some timing issues and some effort at the rubber and at foot strike that should be able to steal some MPH. All the while, giving the impression that you're throwing with maximum velocity.
If velocity truly comes from the kinetic link that starts at the toes and goes to the fingers, then the very middle of the link or the largest muscles should have the biggest say in how MPH are stolen. If you're attempting to change the pace of the pitch at the end of the delivery, it seems you're fighting an uphill battle.
Google how to throw a changeup? You'll find all the information on grips.
Do some research on your own. Look at ASMI and their research and you'll be convinced that the grip is an ancillary manner in which to steal MPH. Oh, I'm sure it helps throw the pitch. But, it doesn't appear to be the only variable involved. And logic says that it's certainly not the most important.
Studies have been done that suggest that the best way to rob MPH from a pitch is to prevent the core from playing a significant role in the delivery.
Consider this. The legs and the core create the greatest forces available to throwing a ball with considerable velocity. Sure, it's the arm that throws the ball but it seems that the arm is a difficult variable to change with mechanics. You throw the way you throw. But, you can change some timing issues and some effort at the rubber and at foot strike that should be able to steal some MPH. All the while, giving the impression that you're throwing with maximum velocity.
If velocity truly comes from the kinetic link that starts at the toes and goes to the fingers, then the very middle of the link or the largest muscles should have the biggest say in how MPH are stolen. If you're attempting to change the pace of the pitch at the end of the delivery, it seems you're fighting an uphill battle.
Google how to throw a changeup? You'll find all the information on grips.
Do some research on your own. Look at ASMI and their research and you'll be convinced that the grip is an ancillary manner in which to steal MPH. Oh, I'm sure it helps throw the pitch. But, it doesn't appear to be the only variable involved. And logic says that it's certainly not the most important.
Sunday, March 2, 2008
Sacrifice bunt- where do you bunt the ball and why?
When a batter squares around he has a choice to make. Where do I bunt the ball?
Traditionally, you either bunt the ball down the first base line or the third base line. However, there are instances where bunting the ball back up the middle is actually a preferred spot. Let's investigate.
Here's how it usually works. Man on 2nd- bunt the ball at the 3B. He's got to stay back to guard against a steal. Man on 1st- bunt the ball at the 1B. He's got to hold the runner on. What would make a batter deviate from the normal plan of action?
1) If the danger spot isn't aggressively pursuing the bunted ball. If the 1B or the 3B, depending who can leave, isn't cheating in and trying to take the bunt away then you can bunt the ball anywhere.
2) If you get two strikes on you, you better just get the ball down somewhere rather than trying to be too cute.
3) This is a pretty advanced idea but sometimes the preferred spot is actually right back up the middle. When a play is on that requires the 3B or the 1B to hold their ground, the pitcher is responsible for hustling over to cover that side of the field. If the batter can anticipate when this play is on, the ideal spot would be the vacated middle.
The sacrifice bunt is such a common play with so many angles to defend. Some defensive teams allow you to bunt the ball anywhere simply satisfied that you're giving them an out. Others play the sacrifice aggressively trying to prevent you from advancing runners. The direction the ball is bunted is really predicated upon how the defense is attacking the play.
However, it's extremely important to understand where you expect to bunt the ball.
Traditionally, you either bunt the ball down the first base line or the third base line. However, there are instances where bunting the ball back up the middle is actually a preferred spot. Let's investigate.
Here's how it usually works. Man on 2nd- bunt the ball at the 3B. He's got to stay back to guard against a steal. Man on 1st- bunt the ball at the 1B. He's got to hold the runner on. What would make a batter deviate from the normal plan of action?
1) If the danger spot isn't aggressively pursuing the bunted ball. If the 1B or the 3B, depending who can leave, isn't cheating in and trying to take the bunt away then you can bunt the ball anywhere.
2) If you get two strikes on you, you better just get the ball down somewhere rather than trying to be too cute.
3) This is a pretty advanced idea but sometimes the preferred spot is actually right back up the middle. When a play is on that requires the 3B or the 1B to hold their ground, the pitcher is responsible for hustling over to cover that side of the field. If the batter can anticipate when this play is on, the ideal spot would be the vacated middle.
The sacrifice bunt is such a common play with so many angles to defend. Some defensive teams allow you to bunt the ball anywhere simply satisfied that you're giving them an out. Others play the sacrifice aggressively trying to prevent you from advancing runners. The direction the ball is bunted is really predicated upon how the defense is attacking the play.
However, it's extremely important to understand where you expect to bunt the ball.
Saturday, March 1, 2008
The unintentional intentional walk
When that sticky situation arises when you need to make a decision whether you intentionally walk a batter or pitch to a batter, the unintentional intentional walk often arises. Coaches say "I'd pitch to him but I wouldn't give him anything to hit."
This sounds like the epitome of sitting on the fence. You know not making a decision is in fact making a decision.
There are so many bad things that can happen when you decide to pitch around a batter.
1- Your pitcher doesn't command the strike zone anyway so how can you ask him to command outside the strike zone?
2- Is your catcher able to block those errant balls that your pitcher is going to be throwing outside of the strike zone?
3- Does your pitchers ego prevent him from totally committing to the plan?
These three issues usually lead me to pick one or the other. And I usually settle on the philosophy of never let the big bat beat you late in the game.
This sounds like the epitome of sitting on the fence. You know not making a decision is in fact making a decision.
There are so many bad things that can happen when you decide to pitch around a batter.
1- Your pitcher doesn't command the strike zone anyway so how can you ask him to command outside the strike zone?
2- Is your catcher able to block those errant balls that your pitcher is going to be throwing outside of the strike zone?
3- Does your pitchers ego prevent him from totally committing to the plan?
These three issues usually lead me to pick one or the other. And I usually settle on the philosophy of never let the big bat beat you late in the game.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
