A 3B coach has to know appropriate times to flash signals and not so appropriate times.
I believe at the amateur level far too many times coaches simply don't flash signals enough. For all intents and purposes, you should give signals when there is an opportunity for a play. Now, understanding that there are in fact times when signals should not be given just speaks to ones understanding of the game. Here are certain times when signals should not be given.
1) When there is no one on base you don't need to give signals other than asking a hitter to bunt for a hit.
2) With 2 outs and no steal opportunity available you don't need to flash any signals. Man on 3rd. Men on 2nd and 3rd. Bases loaded. These are examples when no signal is needed.
3) A pre-determined "green light" option has been set up and both the runner and the batter are aware of this.
4) Up big or down big. You don't need to slow down the pace of the game if the outcome is determined. Teach your players to understand that although we're not quiting we're not going to do anything more than we have to.
If you watch a 3B coach at the Division 1 level you'll see signals that are very intricate. But, you'll also notice that signals are not always given. More than likely, one of the above scenarios applies.
Monday, December 31, 2007
Sunday, December 30, 2007
Man on 1st (0 outs) A 1B series of options
This is a classic bunt situation. Yet, so many teams never do anything different. They have the 1B hold the runner and then record the out at 2B if the ball is bunted where it should be. However, is there something else that could done that isn't too dramatic?
I believe the 1B can do one of 4 things that would definitely make life harder for the offense.
1) The 1B can remain status quo and simply leave his position when the ball gets bunted.
2) The 1B can start in about 15 feet angled so he can see the runner at 1st as well. If the pitcher is lefthanded, the 1B can retreat to the bag asking for the ball when the pitcher lifts his leg. If the pitcher is righthaded, the 1B would initiate the play by retreating. In this manner, we are trying to get the runner to retreat to 1B when the ball is delivered home. Rather than simply holding the runner on in a very customary manner, this essentially is holding the runner on by disguise. The 1B ends up in the same position that he would have been if option #1 was used. The incentive here is that the runner is driven back to the bag rather than his normal secondary.
3) The 1B starts in and then attacks home plate. It is very much like the wheel defense with runners on 1st and 2nd. I believe it would be a great defense if the offense had already seen the "retreat" option by the 1B. This is a very aggressive defense.
4) The 1B starts in and retreats for a pickoff. This play is executed exactly like otion 2 with the exception being that the ball is actually thrown to 1st than to the batter.
The plays have merit when they are worked in conjunction. Option 3 would not be a great play if the runner hadn't already seen play #2.
For that matter, it makes sense to always show play #2 as a first play if you are choosing to employ the 1B package.
I don't know of anyone that runs this package but if it were to be run I would suspect that it would show up in the college game and not the professional game.
I believe the 1B can do one of 4 things that would definitely make life harder for the offense.
1) The 1B can remain status quo and simply leave his position when the ball gets bunted.
2) The 1B can start in about 15 feet angled so he can see the runner at 1st as well. If the pitcher is lefthanded, the 1B can retreat to the bag asking for the ball when the pitcher lifts his leg. If the pitcher is righthaded, the 1B would initiate the play by retreating. In this manner, we are trying to get the runner to retreat to 1B when the ball is delivered home. Rather than simply holding the runner on in a very customary manner, this essentially is holding the runner on by disguise. The 1B ends up in the same position that he would have been if option #1 was used. The incentive here is that the runner is driven back to the bag rather than his normal secondary.
3) The 1B starts in and then attacks home plate. It is very much like the wheel defense with runners on 1st and 2nd. I believe it would be a great defense if the offense had already seen the "retreat" option by the 1B. This is a very aggressive defense.
4) The 1B starts in and retreats for a pickoff. This play is executed exactly like otion 2 with the exception being that the ball is actually thrown to 1st than to the batter.
The plays have merit when they are worked in conjunction. Option 3 would not be a great play if the runner hadn't already seen play #2.
For that matter, it makes sense to always show play #2 as a first play if you are choosing to employ the 1B package.
I don't know of anyone that runs this package but if it were to be run I would suspect that it would show up in the college game and not the professional game.
Saturday, December 29, 2007
3-0 green light?
When the count goes 3-0, what thoughts go into giving the batter the green light.
The first thought that goes into my mind is "What does a green light mean to them?" Are they going to interpret the sign as "I am swinging." If that is the case, then there is no way I would give the kid the green light. I believe that this often is the attitude that goes with the green light. I think that players need to learn to hit 3-0 and it comes with experience. And even then, it is a guarantee that they will be a good hitter in this very advantage count. I believe that research has shown that 3-1 averages are much better than 3-0 averages. Also, because of the Sportscenter age, many amateur players think that 3-0 counts should mean home runs. However, at the big league level the walk dominates the results.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/shareit/PQPP
The only time I would even consider giving a player a green light is if there was a runner in scoring position and the batter hitting behind the 3-0 hitter is struggling. If this were the case, I might ask the batter to try and drive the runner in.
I have had batters ask me "why didn't you let me swing?" I ask them
1) Were there any runners in scoring position?
2) How many extra base hits do you have?
3) Do you think the 3-1 pitch would be that much different than the 3-0 pitch?
Finally, I try and convince them that if they believe that me not allowing them to swing on a 3-0 pitch was the ultimate demise to their at bat then they really need to work on their confidence level.
The 3-0 pitch results in a player on base over 90% of the time There is absolutely nothing wrong with that being 1st base.
The first thought that goes into my mind is "What does a green light mean to them?" Are they going to interpret the sign as "I am swinging." If that is the case, then there is no way I would give the kid the green light. I believe that this often is the attitude that goes with the green light. I think that players need to learn to hit 3-0 and it comes with experience. And even then, it is a guarantee that they will be a good hitter in this very advantage count. I believe that research has shown that 3-1 averages are much better than 3-0 averages. Also, because of the Sportscenter age, many amateur players think that 3-0 counts should mean home runs. However, at the big league level the walk dominates the results.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/shareit/PQPP
The only time I would even consider giving a player a green light is if there was a runner in scoring position and the batter hitting behind the 3-0 hitter is struggling. If this were the case, I might ask the batter to try and drive the runner in.
I have had batters ask me "why didn't you let me swing?" I ask them
1) Were there any runners in scoring position?
2) How many extra base hits do you have?
3) Do you think the 3-1 pitch would be that much different than the 3-0 pitch?
Finally, I try and convince them that if they believe that me not allowing them to swing on a 3-0 pitch was the ultimate demise to their at bat then they really need to work on their confidence level.
The 3-0 pitch results in a player on base over 90% of the time There is absolutely nothing wrong with that being 1st base.
Friday, December 28, 2007
The rundown. Conventional and not so conventional
The rundown is a fundamental teaching point among coaches. There are some basic fundamentals and some definite misconceptions. Let's first define what a rundown is and what it is not. A rundown is when a runner is not advancing towards a base at a high rate of speed. A rundown like we are going to present occurs when a base runner is "stuck."
The basic fundamentals of the rundown are:
a) player with the ball picks which side of the runner to execute the rundown on. You don't want throws sailing directly over the runner.
b) player with the ball gets arm up in throwing position and runs full speed at the runner. Ostensibly, this makes the runner go full speed too so he can avoid being tagged out.
c) when the receiving player wants the ball he demands the ball with his arms up and yells "ball." This is done moving in the direction of the runner. If the runner was full speed it will be very difficult to change direction and outrun the oncoming receiver.
d)arm fake early in the rundown only. Late arm fakes affect the oncoming defender. This could result in him overrunning the base runner.
e) it is very important that the ball is thrown chest high to the oncoming fielder. Rundowns break down when fielders have to stop their momentum to catch a ball rather than continuing at full speed.
f) if during a rundown a runner occupies the same base you are directing a runner to, run them both back and tag both players. At least one will be out.
Points worth debating:
1) Record the out as quickly as possible. Don't worry about direction that the base runner is going. Some coaches amend this principle when it comes to home plate.
2) If the rundown s occurring with other runners on base, you may not want to proceed at a sprint. Other runners might take advantage of your inability to redirect the ball quickly.
3) Some coaches don't like having the receiving player yell "ball" or "now". They believe it alerts the offense and the fundamentals can be done without the verbal.
4) Some coaches allow arm fakes and others don't.
5) Some coaches want the out immediately if there is a trail runner that has advanced. In other words, they don't the runner run back to occupy the bag with the other runner. They believe it could lead to a rundown between other bases. And, it could.
The basic fundamentals of the rundown are:
a) player with the ball picks which side of the runner to execute the rundown on. You don't want throws sailing directly over the runner.
b) player with the ball gets arm up in throwing position and runs full speed at the runner. Ostensibly, this makes the runner go full speed too so he can avoid being tagged out.
c) when the receiving player wants the ball he demands the ball with his arms up and yells "ball." This is done moving in the direction of the runner. If the runner was full speed it will be very difficult to change direction and outrun the oncoming receiver.
d)arm fake early in the rundown only. Late arm fakes affect the oncoming defender. This could result in him overrunning the base runner.
e) it is very important that the ball is thrown chest high to the oncoming fielder. Rundowns break down when fielders have to stop their momentum to catch a ball rather than continuing at full speed.
f) if during a rundown a runner occupies the same base you are directing a runner to, run them both back and tag both players. At least one will be out.
Points worth debating:
1) Record the out as quickly as possible. Don't worry about direction that the base runner is going. Some coaches amend this principle when it comes to home plate.
2) If the rundown s occurring with other runners on base, you may not want to proceed at a sprint. Other runners might take advantage of your inability to redirect the ball quickly.
3) Some coaches don't like having the receiving player yell "ball" or "now". They believe it alerts the offense and the fundamentals can be done without the verbal.
4) Some coaches allow arm fakes and others don't.
5) Some coaches want the out immediately if there is a trail runner that has advanced. In other words, they don't the runner run back to occupy the bag with the other runner. They believe it could lead to a rundown between other bases. And, it could.
Thursday, December 27, 2007
A 3B coach's signs. Do I need to repeat if...
A team has offensive signals. These signals are designed to communicate to the batter and base runner what is expected of them. One question that should arise at some point is "Is the sign on until you take it off?"
For example, the steal sign is given and the pitcher then proceeds to throw to 1B in an attempt to pick off the runner. Is the steal sign still on? This is a topic that must be addressed as a coaching staff. I believe it is a neglected item among baseball coaches but one that is very important.
Consider the pros and cons of giving the sign again.
Pros:
1) In amateur baseball it is a good idea to leave nothing in doubt. If you want something done on a certain pitch- give the sign.
2) It promotes a mindset of always looking for a sign.
Cons:
1) Anytime someone gives a sign, the defense is a little more alert.
2) The defense has an opportunity to "steal" your sign if it continues to repeat itself.
I think in amateur baseball that the pros outweigh the cons. Hopefully the signal package isn't so obvious that the other team would be able to pick up on a sign so quickly.
I might suggest this, however. In a classic bunt scenario where the pitcher throws ball after ball and the batter looks down and the sign is given. It might be advantageous to call time or even anticipate the scenario before he gets in the batters box and say "I want you to bunt until I give you the bunt sign." In this manner, you don't have to continue to give the sign and you have verbally expressed to him what you want him to do. I have done this many times with success. But, it's only in this anticipated bunt situation.
For example, the steal sign is given and the pitcher then proceeds to throw to 1B in an attempt to pick off the runner. Is the steal sign still on? This is a topic that must be addressed as a coaching staff. I believe it is a neglected item among baseball coaches but one that is very important.
Consider the pros and cons of giving the sign again.
Pros:
1) In amateur baseball it is a good idea to leave nothing in doubt. If you want something done on a certain pitch- give the sign.
2) It promotes a mindset of always looking for a sign.
Cons:
1) Anytime someone gives a sign, the defense is a little more alert.
2) The defense has an opportunity to "steal" your sign if it continues to repeat itself.
I think in amateur baseball that the pros outweigh the cons. Hopefully the signal package isn't so obvious that the other team would be able to pick up on a sign so quickly.
I might suggest this, however. In a classic bunt scenario where the pitcher throws ball after ball and the batter looks down and the sign is given. It might be advantageous to call time or even anticipate the scenario before he gets in the batters box and say "I want you to bunt until I give you the bunt sign." In this manner, you don't have to continue to give the sign and you have verbally expressed to him what you want him to do. I have done this many times with success. But, it's only in this anticipated bunt situation.
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
A steal of 3B coupled with a fake bunt
A man gets to 2B and he is thinking "Can I steal 3B?" He is noticing the tendencies of the pitcher and the practices of the middle infielders as to whether he should attempt to steal the base. He is looking into the catcher to see if the catcher is disguising the signals or not. If he can predict a curveball than that might be another opportunity to steal the base. Is there anything else that could help contribute to a properly executed stolen base.
The batter could fake a bunt for a base hit and see if he could confuse the coverage by the 3B.
A steal of 3B could be signaled by the 3B coach or signaled by the runner stealing the base itself. The batter after acknowledging the play is on could fake a bunt for a hit. Ostensibly, this is to draw the 3B in and leave the empty base vacated.
The timing of this play is critical to success. The bunter must show bunt right as the pitcher goes to throw home. We want the 3B seeing the bunt opportunity prior to him hearing or seeing "runner" out of the corner of his eye. We would like the 3B(undisciplined of course) to commit to the bunt while leaving the base open for a steal.
The play is predicated on a very undisciplined 3B. Novice 3B are very vulnerable to this play as there instincts take over on the first sign of a bunt. It's a very tough play to defend if you haven't practiced it plenty times before.
Things to look for to see if this play is a viable option:
a) 3B has come hard on previous bunt attempts.
b) 3B is being told where to play constantly by the coaches
c) 3B is unaware of how to throw the ball around the horn. This means he must be a novice.
The batter could fake a bunt for a base hit and see if he could confuse the coverage by the 3B.
A steal of 3B could be signaled by the 3B coach or signaled by the runner stealing the base itself. The batter after acknowledging the play is on could fake a bunt for a hit. Ostensibly, this is to draw the 3B in and leave the empty base vacated.
The timing of this play is critical to success. The bunter must show bunt right as the pitcher goes to throw home. We want the 3B seeing the bunt opportunity prior to him hearing or seeing "runner" out of the corner of his eye. We would like the 3B(undisciplined of course) to commit to the bunt while leaving the base open for a steal.
The play is predicated on a very undisciplined 3B. Novice 3B are very vulnerable to this play as there instincts take over on the first sign of a bunt. It's a very tough play to defend if you haven't practiced it plenty times before.
Things to look for to see if this play is a viable option:
a) 3B has come hard on previous bunt attempts.
b) 3B is being told where to play constantly by the coaches
c) 3B is unaware of how to throw the ball around the horn. This means he must be a novice.
Tuesday, December 25, 2007
How baseball is like congress.
I can't believe that I haven't heard about something like this somewhere before. Maybe it has occurred but not that I have heard of.
The filibuster is a way that Congress can prevent a bill from ever coming to a vote. Well, baseball is a sport that has its' own form of a filibuster. Yet, it is never used. And hopefully never will be.
Quite simply, what would prevent a team from ever pitching to a batter with a lead late in the game. Here's an example.
6-4 game in the last inning. Runner gets on 1st base. Why not throw to 1B until it gets dark? I mean, unless there are lights, for all intents and purposes the game could end while attempting to pick off the base runner. Is there a rule that says you can only throw to 1B a certain amount of time?
On a smaller, less egregious note, how about throwing to 1B until a relief pitcher is ready. Again, is there a rule that says you have to deliver the ball rather than attempting a pickoff.
So long as you can tolerate the amount of "boos" that would rain down, I see no reason why this isn't sound strategy. Boring -probably. Unethical - marginally. Smart- absolutely.
The filibuster is a way that Congress can prevent a bill from ever coming to a vote. Well, baseball is a sport that has its' own form of a filibuster. Yet, it is never used. And hopefully never will be.
Quite simply, what would prevent a team from ever pitching to a batter with a lead late in the game. Here's an example.
6-4 game in the last inning. Runner gets on 1st base. Why not throw to 1B until it gets dark? I mean, unless there are lights, for all intents and purposes the game could end while attempting to pick off the base runner. Is there a rule that says you can only throw to 1B a certain amount of time?
On a smaller, less egregious note, how about throwing to 1B until a relief pitcher is ready. Again, is there a rule that says you have to deliver the ball rather than attempting a pickoff.
So long as you can tolerate the amount of "boos" that would rain down, I see no reason why this isn't sound strategy. Boring -probably. Unethical - marginally. Smart- absolutely.
Monday, December 24, 2007
Do you walk the bases loaded?
You are tied 5-5 in the last inning. The home team comes to the plate and manages to work a runner to 3B with 1 out. So many scenarios, so many options.
Do you intentionally walk the next two batters?
Option A) Do not walk the batter and try and prevent the run from scoring by moving your infield(maybe 5 infielders in this situation) in. Although the infield is in there is not a force play at home plate. If the runner at 3B has some speed this proves to be a very tricky situation.
Option B) Intentionally walk the next two batters and create a double play opportunity or at least a force at home plate.
Option B is really only prudent advice if the defense has a realistic chance of turning a double play. Can high school players do this? Some, sure. Can college players do this? I would think a whole lot more efficiently.
This back to back intentional walk also places a burden on the pitcher. Sometimes working with the bases loaded and knowing the consequences of a third walk can be a very onerous proposition. The manager must take into account his pitchers disposition before asking the pitcher to load the bases. Some pitchers just can't pitch with that pressure.
Lots of variables in making this decision. It is one of those decisions that takes a lot of guts to walk the bases loaded. I think at the amateur level it's very risky to load the bases because infields and infielders just aren't tailored for double play opportunities with ease. With highly manicured fields and proficient infielders this decision is almost a "no brainer."
Do you intentionally walk the next two batters?
Option A) Do not walk the batter and try and prevent the run from scoring by moving your infield(maybe 5 infielders in this situation) in. Although the infield is in there is not a force play at home plate. If the runner at 3B has some speed this proves to be a very tricky situation.
Option B) Intentionally walk the next two batters and create a double play opportunity or at least a force at home plate.
Option B is really only prudent advice if the defense has a realistic chance of turning a double play. Can high school players do this? Some, sure. Can college players do this? I would think a whole lot more efficiently.
This back to back intentional walk also places a burden on the pitcher. Sometimes working with the bases loaded and knowing the consequences of a third walk can be a very onerous proposition. The manager must take into account his pitchers disposition before asking the pitcher to load the bases. Some pitchers just can't pitch with that pressure.
Lots of variables in making this decision. It is one of those decisions that takes a lot of guts to walk the bases loaded. I think at the amateur level it's very risky to load the bases because infields and infielders just aren't tailored for double play opportunities with ease. With highly manicured fields and proficient infielders this decision is almost a "no brainer."
Sunday, December 23, 2007
Do you use a pinch runner here?
Amateur baseball has many different rules than professional baseball. In addition, high school baseball has different rules than college baseball. One such rule difference is the idea of "free" substitution. In high school baseball you are allowed to take a player out of the game one time with no penalty. You may re-enter that play at any point in the game after he has been removed. This makes managing a high school game easier than its counterparts with respect to pinch runners. Here's what I'm talking about.
Tie game in the last inning. Leadoff batter(4 hitter) reaches on a walk. He isn't the fleetest of foot so you consider pinch running for him. In high school baseball it's a no brainer. But, in college and pro ball you must weigh the pros and the cons of the idea. Also, for discussion sake, let's say that the high school batter has already been substituted for to make all things equal.
The pros:
a) speed at 1st allows you to score on a hit in the gap.
b) speed at 1st takes pressure off of a would be bunt attempt by the batter. He doesn't have to be so precise.
c) there is no way to quantify how speed disrupts the pitchers mindset.
d) a) Statistics actually reveal that the odds of a runner scoring at 1st with no outs is higher than a runner at 2B and 1 out.
http://baseballanalysts.com/archives/2006/07/empirical_analy_1.php
The con(but it's a big one):
If you don't score the run, the game continues with one of your best hitters on the bench.
Quite simply, it's one of the toughest decisions in the game.
I'm not going to opine that one way is better than another way. It has a lot to do with gut feel. But, I will suggest that in this situation what might be a best option is to wait until the runner gets into scoring position before pinch running. In this manner at least the runner can score on a single and if the batters bunt(assuming you bunt) isn't successful you still have one of your dangerous bats in the lineup for extra innings.
This scenario might also be a candidate for a bunt and run. This gives the runner at 1st a "head start" to 2B. The only caveat here is the batter better protect the runner.
It's a great debate and certainly one that allow you to second guess a manager. Just as an fyi, David Ortiz was removed in this very situation in the playoffs this past year. Terry Francona believed that speed was more valuable in the game in that spot than one of the greatest clutch hitters in baseball history. I think the runner scored. I was too busy thinking about what I would have done.
One last thought: if it's high school baseball and the cleanup hitter is the catcher or the pitcher you could always use a courtesy runner and not suffer any consequences. What a joke that is.
Tie game in the last inning. Leadoff batter(4 hitter) reaches on a walk. He isn't the fleetest of foot so you consider pinch running for him. In high school baseball it's a no brainer. But, in college and pro ball you must weigh the pros and the cons of the idea. Also, for discussion sake, let's say that the high school batter has already been substituted for to make all things equal.
The pros:
a) speed at 1st allows you to score on a hit in the gap.
b) speed at 1st takes pressure off of a would be bunt attempt by the batter. He doesn't have to be so precise.
c) there is no way to quantify how speed disrupts the pitchers mindset.
d) a) Statistics actually reveal that the odds of a runner scoring at 1st with no outs is higher than a runner at 2B and 1 out.
http://baseballanalysts.com/archives/2006/07/empirical_analy_1.php
The con(but it's a big one):
If you don't score the run, the game continues with one of your best hitters on the bench.
Quite simply, it's one of the toughest decisions in the game.
I'm not going to opine that one way is better than another way. It has a lot to do with gut feel. But, I will suggest that in this situation what might be a best option is to wait until the runner gets into scoring position before pinch running. In this manner at least the runner can score on a single and if the batters bunt(assuming you bunt) isn't successful you still have one of your dangerous bats in the lineup for extra innings.
This scenario might also be a candidate for a bunt and run. This gives the runner at 1st a "head start" to 2B. The only caveat here is the batter better protect the runner.
It's a great debate and certainly one that allow you to second guess a manager. Just as an fyi, David Ortiz was removed in this very situation in the playoffs this past year. Terry Francona believed that speed was more valuable in the game in that spot than one of the greatest clutch hitters in baseball history. I think the runner scored. I was too busy thinking about what I would have done.
One last thought: if it's high school baseball and the cleanup hitter is the catcher or the pitcher you could always use a courtesy runner and not suffer any consequences. What a joke that is.
Saturday, December 22, 2007
What do elite level hitters see at release?
The question is very interesting in that the elite hitter probably couldn't sit down and articuate what it is that he actually sees. Its more of a moment in time thing that he reacts to. He probably can't write it down. But, not so elite hitters feel the need to tell "elite wanna be hitters" what to look for so I'll try too.
We see the fastball exit the pitchers hand with the fingertips on top. Now, at elite levels there are two distinct fastballs and they act so extraordinarily different. The 4 seam fastball has tremendous backspin and the ball spinning with four seams cutting the air holds its' line. The two seam fastball is affected by the wind more and will be pushed to the pitchers arm side. Is there something that an elite level hitter sees that can discriminate between the two? The seams should be more noticeable on a two seamer. But, only lots and lots of experience gives you this perception. And, even then, that might not be enough. I mean how many times has Greg Maddux frozen hitters with that two seamer that just seems to back up.
We see the changeup exit the pitchers hand with the fingertips on top. This is what makes this pitch so extraordinarily difficult to hit. If the pitcher doesn't slow his harm speed down it's lethal. Think Cole Hamels or Trevor Hoffman.
The curveball exits the hand and the white off the ball gets on top of the fingers. A lot of people say look at the spin but that's just too late for elite level hitters. "White on top."
The slider gets a little less white on top but a "dot" emerges on the ball as it is progressing to home plate. The dot indicates to the batter that it will slide away from him.
It's quite an amazing process but no one truly knows what elite level hitters see because I believe elite hitters would have a difficult time explaining it themsleves.
We see the fastball exit the pitchers hand with the fingertips on top. Now, at elite levels there are two distinct fastballs and they act so extraordinarily different. The 4 seam fastball has tremendous backspin and the ball spinning with four seams cutting the air holds its' line. The two seam fastball is affected by the wind more and will be pushed to the pitchers arm side. Is there something that an elite level hitter sees that can discriminate between the two? The seams should be more noticeable on a two seamer. But, only lots and lots of experience gives you this perception. And, even then, that might not be enough. I mean how many times has Greg Maddux frozen hitters with that two seamer that just seems to back up.
We see the changeup exit the pitchers hand with the fingertips on top. This is what makes this pitch so extraordinarily difficult to hit. If the pitcher doesn't slow his harm speed down it's lethal. Think Cole Hamels or Trevor Hoffman.
The curveball exits the hand and the white off the ball gets on top of the fingers. A lot of people say look at the spin but that's just too late for elite level hitters. "White on top."
The slider gets a little less white on top but a "dot" emerges on the ball as it is progressing to home plate. The dot indicates to the batter that it will slide away from him.
It's quite an amazing process but no one truly knows what elite level hitters see because I believe elite hitters would have a difficult time explaining it themsleves.
Friday, December 21, 2007
What to read on a bunt and run around 2B
Runner at 1st takes off with hit and run principles. He makes sure that the ball is thrown home. He looks in after three strides. He sees the ball bunted. Now, does he take 3B or does he settle at 2B?
The answer lies in what the 3B does. If the 3B attacks the bunt there is a better than average chance that the base will be available to be taken. Often times, regardless of whether or not the 3B actually fields the ball, the issue is did he leave his position to field the ball. If yes, 3B is vacated and the runner should be aggressive toward 3B.
Something else to consider. If the runner is an "A runner" it may not matter if 3B is vacated or not.
When the 3B or pitcher cocks his arm to throw the batter out, the runner rounding the bag could advance to 3B if he has already touched and rounded 2B. This is a decision that must be made with an adequate amount of practice. You want to be knowledgeable about your speed vs. the timing of throwing to 1B and getting a return throw back to 3B.
The bunt and run is a "college game" principle. It's primarily effective when arm strengths aren't quite strong enough to fire across the diagonal of the diamond.
The answer lies in what the 3B does. If the 3B attacks the bunt there is a better than average chance that the base will be available to be taken. Often times, regardless of whether or not the 3B actually fields the ball, the issue is did he leave his position to field the ball. If yes, 3B is vacated and the runner should be aggressive toward 3B.
Something else to consider. If the runner is an "A runner" it may not matter if 3B is vacated or not.
When the 3B or pitcher cocks his arm to throw the batter out, the runner rounding the bag could advance to 3B if he has already touched and rounded 2B. This is a decision that must be made with an adequate amount of practice. You want to be knowledgeable about your speed vs. the timing of throwing to 1B and getting a return throw back to 3B.
The bunt and run is a "college game" principle. It's primarily effective when arm strengths aren't quite strong enough to fire across the diagonal of the diamond.
Thursday, December 20, 2007
The most common triple play
I wonder how many baseball coaches think with a negative thought in mind before implementing a play. Should I risk a triple play hardly seems like a prudent way of thinking. However, it would be remiss to not consider it when putting on a hit and run with runners on 1st and 2nd.
Runners on 1st and 2nd, 0 outs. Do I "start" the runners in a 3-2 count? Do I put on a hit and run? These are decisions that a manager must decide on in the heat of the moment. The thinking is that if you start the runner you could avoid a double play while moving a runner to 3B with 1 out. Certainly, you could have a better result with a base hit but at the least a runner at 3B with 1 out is music to most offensive teams.
But, what also could happen could be catastrophic. What if the batter ropes a line drive that get caughts in the infield. Well, quite simply a triple play.
Does it cross a manager's mind when putting the runners in motion? It should. I would suggest that the nature of the pitcher should have a big say in whether or not it is a good decision. If the pitcher induces a lot of ground balls then I would think it would be worth the risk. Staying out of the double play is a very important part of offensive gameplanning.
The next time a triple play is recorded, check if it was of this variety. I'll even go so far as to say the majority of triple plays probably occur in 3-2 counts as that is the count where most runners run.
I wonder if those stats are out there somewhere.
Runners on 1st and 2nd, 0 outs. Do I "start" the runners in a 3-2 count? Do I put on a hit and run? These are decisions that a manager must decide on in the heat of the moment. The thinking is that if you start the runner you could avoid a double play while moving a runner to 3B with 1 out. Certainly, you could have a better result with a base hit but at the least a runner at 3B with 1 out is music to most offensive teams.
But, what also could happen could be catastrophic. What if the batter ropes a line drive that get caughts in the infield. Well, quite simply a triple play.
Does it cross a manager's mind when putting the runners in motion? It should. I would suggest that the nature of the pitcher should have a big say in whether or not it is a good decision. If the pitcher induces a lot of ground balls then I would think it would be worth the risk. Staying out of the double play is a very important part of offensive gameplanning.
The next time a triple play is recorded, check if it was of this variety. I'll even go so far as to say the majority of triple plays probably occur in 3-2 counts as that is the count where most runners run.
I wonder if those stats are out there somewhere.
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
The mechanics of the "flash" bunt defense
When baserunners get to 1st and 2nd with 0 out, a bunt defense is usually put on by the defense. This is to ensure that the defense knows their priorities when a ball gets bunted.
One of the more aggressive and obscure bunt defenses is called the "flash" play.
As the pitcher comes set, he glances at the lead runner at 2B. When he sees the SS flash to 2B behind the lead runner, the pitcher delivers the ball home. The efficacy of the play revolves around the deception of the shortstop. The shortstop must resoundingly scream "ball, ball, ball" when driving the runner back to 2B. The runner will more than likely retreat to 2B. The 3B coach might even yell "back!" We're hoping so anyway.
As soon as the pitcher sees daylight between the runner and the SS he needs to slide step and deliver the ball to the plate. The slide step is important because the runner isn't given an opportunity to shuffle back to a normal secondary position.
When the ball gets bunted, the 3B is attempting to hold his ground because he will be catching the throw at 3B. If the pitcher can't get the ball the 3B must vacate the bag to field the ball. However, in a perfect world, the pitcher will field the ball and turn to throw to the 3B awaiting the throw.
The play is designed to work because the lead runner will be asked to run close to 90 feet rather than 75 feet or so.
The catcher must absolutely understand our priorities here. We're thinking throw to 3B if at all possible. If not, we'll take the out at 1B but we did a lot to simply record the basic out at 1B.
This defense is a very challenging defense for the 3B as he must make a read as to what he should do. Ideally he should stay. However, if the offense does its' job, the 3B must leave to record an out.
One of the more aggressive and obscure bunt defenses is called the "flash" play.
As the pitcher comes set, he glances at the lead runner at 2B. When he sees the SS flash to 2B behind the lead runner, the pitcher delivers the ball home. The efficacy of the play revolves around the deception of the shortstop. The shortstop must resoundingly scream "ball, ball, ball" when driving the runner back to 2B. The runner will more than likely retreat to 2B. The 3B coach might even yell "back!" We're hoping so anyway.
As soon as the pitcher sees daylight between the runner and the SS he needs to slide step and deliver the ball to the plate. The slide step is important because the runner isn't given an opportunity to shuffle back to a normal secondary position.
When the ball gets bunted, the 3B is attempting to hold his ground because he will be catching the throw at 3B. If the pitcher can't get the ball the 3B must vacate the bag to field the ball. However, in a perfect world, the pitcher will field the ball and turn to throw to the 3B awaiting the throw.
The play is designed to work because the lead runner will be asked to run close to 90 feet rather than 75 feet or so.
The catcher must absolutely understand our priorities here. We're thinking throw to 3B if at all possible. If not, we'll take the out at 1B but we did a lot to simply record the basic out at 1B.
This defense is a very challenging defense for the 3B as he must make a read as to what he should do. Ideally he should stay. However, if the offense does its' job, the 3B must leave to record an out.
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
The mechanics of the "No doubles defense"
When a tying or go ahead run comes to the plate or reaches first base late in the game this defense is considered by coaches. What is it? What do you do?
Here is what occurs.
For all intents and purposes it is a prevent defense in baseball. The outfielders are moved out of normal depth and situated in a much deeper alignment that is to prevent a double. The wing outfielders slide deeper and into the gaps while the center fielder goes staright back and deep. The corner infielders guard the lines to prevent the double down the lines. All of these changes open up the field of play for more possible base hits. However, it's premise is to guard against the big hit or extra base hit.
There are also subtle nuances of the defense.
The first nuance is that the outfielders should not dive at a ball. A dive could result in a double while allowing the ball to drop safely would result in a hit but certainly prevent a double.
The second nuance is that the 1B needs to come off the bag to catch all low, errant throws rather than trying to make a great play. This thinking coincides with the "no dives" thinking in that if you at least catch the ball you won't get a double. You may not record an out but at least you won't give the team 2B as well.
I'm not suggesting that this defense is a prudent defense in all situations as mentioned above but it should at least be considered.
Here is what occurs.
For all intents and purposes it is a prevent defense in baseball. The outfielders are moved out of normal depth and situated in a much deeper alignment that is to prevent a double. The wing outfielders slide deeper and into the gaps while the center fielder goes staright back and deep. The corner infielders guard the lines to prevent the double down the lines. All of these changes open up the field of play for more possible base hits. However, it's premise is to guard against the big hit or extra base hit.
There are also subtle nuances of the defense.
The first nuance is that the outfielders should not dive at a ball. A dive could result in a double while allowing the ball to drop safely would result in a hit but certainly prevent a double.
The second nuance is that the 1B needs to come off the bag to catch all low, errant throws rather than trying to make a great play. This thinking coincides with the "no dives" thinking in that if you at least catch the ball you won't get a double. You may not record an out but at least you won't give the team 2B as well.
I'm not suggesting that this defense is a prudent defense in all situations as mentioned above but it should at least be considered.
Monday, December 17, 2007
Taking 2B after a clean single
There is a ball hit to the outfield for a clean single. The ball is returned into the infield and the play appears dead ready to move onto the next batter. However, the runner needs to pay attention to the manners of the middle infielders to see if he can move up a base.
Here is what I am talking about.
Single to the outfield and the batter rounds 1B and retreats to the bag. Although he is returning to the bag he has his mind focused on advancing to 2B. As the ball is returned to the infield notice the middle infielders. Often times they catch the ball from the outfielder and throw it to the pitcher. Following the throw is the move that makes them vulnerable.
The middle infielder tosses it to the pitcher and turns his back on the batter now on 1B. The runner notices this and begins to shuffle in the direction of 2B. Ideally, the batter/runner should not have retreated all the way to 1B if the intent is to possibly take 2B.
Upon noticing that the middle infielders are "head droppers" and "back turners" they play begins. Simply, the batter/runner sprints with the ball in the pitchers hand . Although the throw is a short simple one, there are no middle infielders available to catch the ball. Safe at 2B.
In order to successfully execute this play, you must have scouted the defense and noted the tendency to relax after singles to the outfield. Once it is obvious, it simply takes some guts to do it.
Remember the outs rule and try it with two out. It's worth the risk.
Here is what I am talking about.
Single to the outfield and the batter rounds 1B and retreats to the bag. Although he is returning to the bag he has his mind focused on advancing to 2B. As the ball is returned to the infield notice the middle infielders. Often times they catch the ball from the outfielder and throw it to the pitcher. Following the throw is the move that makes them vulnerable.
The middle infielder tosses it to the pitcher and turns his back on the batter now on 1B. The runner notices this and begins to shuffle in the direction of 2B. Ideally, the batter/runner should not have retreated all the way to 1B if the intent is to possibly take 2B.
Upon noticing that the middle infielders are "head droppers" and "back turners" they play begins. Simply, the batter/runner sprints with the ball in the pitchers hand . Although the throw is a short simple one, there are no middle infielders available to catch the ball. Safe at 2B.
In order to successfully execute this play, you must have scouted the defense and noted the tendency to relax after singles to the outfield. Once it is obvious, it simply takes some guts to do it.
Remember the outs rule and try it with two out. It's worth the risk.
Sunday, December 16, 2007
Pop up to the catcher
When the ball goes straight up above the catcher you absolutely have one of baseballs toughest plays. Here's why.
The ball goes up with a lot of topspin imparted on the ball. What this means is that the ball will come back towards the infield as it starts to descend. The perception from a catcher's standpoint is that it will return to the ground straight below where it reaches its' apex. Understanding physics gives the catcher a better chance at recording the out.
Catcher should always turn his back to the infield as the ball will return to him. Also, there are plenty of fielders in the field of play but only the catcher in foul territory. So, the catcher should turn his back for both reasons. Once the ball is located, the catcher should proceed depending on the height of the ball. The higher the ball, the slower the walk.
You want to constantly keep the ball at 10 degrees above you. You do not want to get underneath the ball. It will fall behind you if the catcher does not maintain 10 degrees.
The other fundamental is the dismissing of the catcher's mask. This should be done very late in the process. A must is that you do not trip over the mask. Therefore, once the catcher recognizes where the ball is hit he throws the mask in the other direction.
Pop ups to catchers are very challenging. Any catcher will tell you that if another infielder could catch the ball he would gladly trade responsibilities.
The ball goes up with a lot of topspin imparted on the ball. What this means is that the ball will come back towards the infield as it starts to descend. The perception from a catcher's standpoint is that it will return to the ground straight below where it reaches its' apex. Understanding physics gives the catcher a better chance at recording the out.
Catcher should always turn his back to the infield as the ball will return to him. Also, there are plenty of fielders in the field of play but only the catcher in foul territory. So, the catcher should turn his back for both reasons. Once the ball is located, the catcher should proceed depending on the height of the ball. The higher the ball, the slower the walk.
You want to constantly keep the ball at 10 degrees above you. You do not want to get underneath the ball. It will fall behind you if the catcher does not maintain 10 degrees.
The other fundamental is the dismissing of the catcher's mask. This should be done very late in the process. A must is that you do not trip over the mask. Therefore, once the catcher recognizes where the ball is hit he throws the mask in the other direction.
Pop ups to catchers are very challenging. Any catcher will tell you that if another infielder could catch the ball he would gladly trade responsibilities.
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Hit and run on? (when can the batter take?)
The hit and run is designed to put the runner in motion and have the runner be protected by the batter. The play is to gain at least an extra base by having the runner hit the ball on the ground while the runner slides safely into second base. At most, the play is to result in the runner advancing two bases and the batter reaching base safely presumably by an infielder opening up a hole.
Well, can the play be successful if the batter doesn't swing? Yes. But, only on a couple of situations.
Here is when the batter does not need to protect the runner.
1)Runner takes off and the ball is thrown in the dirt. The batter is not expected to protect the runner as it would take an extraordinary play to throw the runner out at 2B.
2)Runner takes off and the ball is going to actually hit the batter. By all means, take the HBP and move on. "Don't rub it."
3)Runner takes off and the ball is a pitchout. If they pitchout, they win. At least, that phase of the hit and run. There is a chance that the runner could be safe but we're certainly not going to ask the batter to protect the runner and risk a strike on the batter when there is still an above average shot of the runner being thrown out anyway.
The hit and run is predicated on the batter protecting the runner. However, if the pitcher makes a pitch that makes protection unlikely, take the pitch. Some results will be good and others will be bad but it's not because it wasn't the prudent choice to take the pitch.
Well, can the play be successful if the batter doesn't swing? Yes. But, only on a couple of situations.
Here is when the batter does not need to protect the runner.
1)Runner takes off and the ball is thrown in the dirt. The batter is not expected to protect the runner as it would take an extraordinary play to throw the runner out at 2B.
2)Runner takes off and the ball is going to actually hit the batter. By all means, take the HBP and move on. "Don't rub it."
3)Runner takes off and the ball is a pitchout. If they pitchout, they win. At least, that phase of the hit and run. There is a chance that the runner could be safe but we're certainly not going to ask the batter to protect the runner and risk a strike on the batter when there is still an above average shot of the runner being thrown out anyway.
The hit and run is predicated on the batter protecting the runner. However, if the pitcher makes a pitch that makes protection unlikely, take the pitch. Some results will be good and others will be bad but it's not because it wasn't the prudent choice to take the pitch.
Friday, December 14, 2007
A pickoff at 2B from the windup.
You seldom see the play where the pitcher throws from the windup and attempts a pickoff at 2B but it at least should be considered a viable option to consider.
With a runner at 2B and the pitcher out of the windup, that means there is a runner at 3B also. So, first and foremost you need to decide if it's worth the risk of throwing to 2B with home plate being a threat if an errant throw is made.
If you believe the throw can be made, here is what can be done.
The catcher simply drops his glove when he sees that the shortstop or 2B have broken to the bag. When they break the catcher drops his glove and the pitcher turns and throws to an awaiting middle infielder. Now, the turn part of the pitcher needs to be practiced. The way it works is the pitcher must drop step with his "posting" leg. He can not initiate movement with his foot that start the delivery.
It can be very effective when done correctly.
The only caveat though is more than likely it would occur with 2 outs and you would need to decide if it is worth the risk of attempting to create a putout in this manner rather than attacking the batter.
With a runner at 2B and the pitcher out of the windup, that means there is a runner at 3B also. So, first and foremost you need to decide if it's worth the risk of throwing to 2B with home plate being a threat if an errant throw is made.
If you believe the throw can be made, here is what can be done.
The catcher simply drops his glove when he sees that the shortstop or 2B have broken to the bag. When they break the catcher drops his glove and the pitcher turns and throws to an awaiting middle infielder. Now, the turn part of the pitcher needs to be practiced. The way it works is the pitcher must drop step with his "posting" leg. He can not initiate movement with his foot that start the delivery.
It can be very effective when done correctly.
The only caveat though is more than likely it would occur with 2 outs and you would need to decide if it is worth the risk of attempting to create a putout in this manner rather than attacking the batter.
Thursday, December 13, 2007
2 outs man on 2B, 3B coach should consider what?
With a man on 2B and 2 outs the 3B coach needs to think about a variety of things. Here are some things that he needs to process to allow him to make the best decisions possible.
The first thing that needs to be understood is that an out will end the inning. This is obvious but it has some interesting ramifications. Here are the possibliities and what needs to be considered.
a) a single to the outfield. In all likelihood, I will be sending the runner since he is off on contact. With 2 outs and 2 strikes he should be off when the batter begins his swing. Therefore, with 2 outs and 2 strikes I might be even more willing to send the runner. In amateur baseball, I believe the runner should be waived about 95% of the time. The exception? A hot shot directly at an outfielder. Sometimes, it depends who is on deck but with 2 outs I'm thinking score the run when you can.
b) a ground ball to an infielder who needs to record an out at 1B. If the runner at 2B gets a good break and doesn't allow the infielder to tag him to end the inning a throw will be made to 1B. The 3B coach should weigh the thought of "what if the ball is thrown errantly?" If the runner has advanced far enough he should be sent home. If the runner has not advanced enough he should be held up. The thought process here is if the ball is in the dirt or the ball pulls the 1B off the bag, we went to score the run coming around 3B.
Many times innings end with a runner approaching home plate only to pull up as the inning ends. But, sometimes the ball ricochets off the 1B and that runner scores a run. If that runner were held up at 3B, a run would be lost. You can't blindly send them in this situation, however.
The batters speed should be a factor that gets considered. If the batter has the ability to beat a routine ground ball out, the last thing you would want to do is send the runner home when the inning could still be alive on a good throw. In this scenario, the 1B would simply catch and throw home to end the inning. Not necessarily a good decision by the 3B coach.
A major variable in all of this is the speed of the runner rounding 3B. If the runner is an "A" runner, send him regardless of how close the play might be at 1B. Of course, this depends on the break he got off of 2B. But, the risk is worth the reward.
Next time you're watching a game, take note of the runner at 2B with 2 outs. It's a very detailed part of coaching 3B but it can play big dividends if it is recognized.
The first thing that needs to be understood is that an out will end the inning. This is obvious but it has some interesting ramifications. Here are the possibliities and what needs to be considered.
a) a single to the outfield. In all likelihood, I will be sending the runner since he is off on contact. With 2 outs and 2 strikes he should be off when the batter begins his swing. Therefore, with 2 outs and 2 strikes I might be even more willing to send the runner. In amateur baseball, I believe the runner should be waived about 95% of the time. The exception? A hot shot directly at an outfielder. Sometimes, it depends who is on deck but with 2 outs I'm thinking score the run when you can.
b) a ground ball to an infielder who needs to record an out at 1B. If the runner at 2B gets a good break and doesn't allow the infielder to tag him to end the inning a throw will be made to 1B. The 3B coach should weigh the thought of "what if the ball is thrown errantly?" If the runner has advanced far enough he should be sent home. If the runner has not advanced enough he should be held up. The thought process here is if the ball is in the dirt or the ball pulls the 1B off the bag, we went to score the run coming around 3B.
Many times innings end with a runner approaching home plate only to pull up as the inning ends. But, sometimes the ball ricochets off the 1B and that runner scores a run. If that runner were held up at 3B, a run would be lost. You can't blindly send them in this situation, however.
The batters speed should be a factor that gets considered. If the batter has the ability to beat a routine ground ball out, the last thing you would want to do is send the runner home when the inning could still be alive on a good throw. In this scenario, the 1B would simply catch and throw home to end the inning. Not necessarily a good decision by the 3B coach.
A major variable in all of this is the speed of the runner rounding 3B. If the runner is an "A" runner, send him regardless of how close the play might be at 1B. Of course, this depends on the break he got off of 2B. But, the risk is worth the reward.
Next time you're watching a game, take note of the runner at 2B with 2 outs. It's a very detailed part of coaching 3B but it can play big dividends if it is recognized.
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Managing your timeouts
Every manager in amateur baseball is entitled to timeouts throughout the course of a game. Yet, many refuse to take all their necessary opportunities. The timeout doesn't always need to be taken when things are bleak or your pitcher is struggling. The timeout can be used to explain something offesnively or defensively that is considered important.
I get insensed with managers who refuse to use these built in advantages for the betterment of the team. You are permitted 3 "free" defensive trips to the mound throughout the course of the game. In other words, you can call time out 3 times at any time and discuss whatever it is that you would like. You want to discuss a bunt situation? Go for it. You want to discuss an infield in situation? Go for it. You want to discuss a no doubles situation? Go for it. It doesn't always need to be screamed from the dugout. And, it doesn't always need to be done on the pitcher's mound.
Offensively, you are permitted one conference per inning. Doesn't it make sense to consider using these as often as possible. If you need to express to a batter what you might like him to do once he reaches base- perfect opportunity. You may want to discuss with a batter what you believe the catcher's signs are at 2B(obvious if he is at 2B?) You may want to discuss with the runner on 1B what you would like to see happen. You may call an offensive timeout and express your views.
From my standpoint, I think it needs to occur a whole lot more often than I see.
Something to consider.
I get insensed with managers who refuse to use these built in advantages for the betterment of the team. You are permitted 3 "free" defensive trips to the mound throughout the course of the game. In other words, you can call time out 3 times at any time and discuss whatever it is that you would like. You want to discuss a bunt situation? Go for it. You want to discuss an infield in situation? Go for it. You want to discuss a no doubles situation? Go for it. It doesn't always need to be screamed from the dugout. And, it doesn't always need to be done on the pitcher's mound.
Offensively, you are permitted one conference per inning. Doesn't it make sense to consider using these as often as possible. If you need to express to a batter what you might like him to do once he reaches base- perfect opportunity. You may want to discuss with a batter what you believe the catcher's signs are at 2B(obvious if he is at 2B?) You may want to discuss with the runner on 1B what you would like to see happen. You may call an offensive timeout and express your views.
From my standpoint, I think it needs to occur a whole lot more often than I see.
Something to consider.
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Around the horn
This baseball tradition seems innocent enough but it can have dire consequences.
Catcher is asked to whip the ball to the 3B after a strikeout. He does this as much to show some spirit and energy as much to keep the infielders arms loose. The catcher is also asked to apply a tag to the batter if the ball is dropped on a 3rd strike. What if the "around the horn" and the tagging of the batter conflict?
It happened very recently to my team and I know think differently about the theory of around the horn.
A batter struck out and the catcher dropped the ball. The catcher in his zest to throw the ball around the horn air mailed the 3B. The batter advanced to 1B and ultimately scored. After questioning the catcher I began to question myself and baseball itself.
Ostensibly, the catcher threw the ball at the 3B for no practical reason. Therefore, his throw that served no functional purpose ultimately cost us a run and the game.
The answer? Don't throw the ball around the horn.
Very simple.
Catcher is asked to whip the ball to the 3B after a strikeout. He does this as much to show some spirit and energy as much to keep the infielders arms loose. The catcher is also asked to apply a tag to the batter if the ball is dropped on a 3rd strike. What if the "around the horn" and the tagging of the batter conflict?
It happened very recently to my team and I know think differently about the theory of around the horn.
A batter struck out and the catcher dropped the ball. The catcher in his zest to throw the ball around the horn air mailed the 3B. The batter advanced to 1B and ultimately scored. After questioning the catcher I began to question myself and baseball itself.
Ostensibly, the catcher threw the ball at the 3B for no practical reason. Therefore, his throw that served no functional purpose ultimately cost us a run and the game.
The answer? Don't throw the ball around the horn.
Very simple.
Monday, December 10, 2007
The mechanics of stealing 3B
Scoring runs is the primary goal of the offense. However, a very legitimate decision even when a runner gets into scoring position is "is the risk of stealing 3B worth it?"
So, when you decide that the risk is worth it, how do you teach it? Here is how I think it should be taught.
I believe it must be stressed that shortening the distance to 3B is critical. You have to understand that the catcher's throw is obviously a shorter throw so if you want to steal 3B you must dramatically shorten the distance being run. Here is how to do it.
Take a lead in the base line. The last thing you want to do is run further than you have to. If you choose not to take a lead in the base line you better be walking into the baseline before you choose to steal 3B. Once your lead is taken, you need to anticipate the pitchers delivery. Quite frankly, 3B is stolen off of the pitcher. If the pitcher is predictable to home plate he becomes very vulnerable to the steal. How could the pitcher be predictable?
a) He could pitch in rhythm. This means that the pitcher comes set and then delivers the ball in the same manner every time. When this manner is determined, the runner can shuffle in the direction of 3B thus shortening his distance. When the pitcher actually goes to deliver the ball to the catcher, the runner gets to full speed as quickly as possible. Some teams stress not crossing over until you realize that the pitcher is in fact throwing home. I disagree. I'm willing to concede that if the pitcher does an inside move on a steal of 3B the runner will most likely be dead.
b) the pitcher could be very slow to the plate. If the pitcher is slow to the plate you might not need to be too fancy. You simply try and get a walking lead and get to full speed at his leg lift.
I think stealing 3B is not practiced nearly enough. Again, the steal is contingent upon the pitcher. If a pithcer isn't monitoring is timing and predictability he is vulnerable to the steal of 3B.
So, when you decide that the risk is worth it, how do you teach it? Here is how I think it should be taught.
I believe it must be stressed that shortening the distance to 3B is critical. You have to understand that the catcher's throw is obviously a shorter throw so if you want to steal 3B you must dramatically shorten the distance being run. Here is how to do it.
Take a lead in the base line. The last thing you want to do is run further than you have to. If you choose not to take a lead in the base line you better be walking into the baseline before you choose to steal 3B. Once your lead is taken, you need to anticipate the pitchers delivery. Quite frankly, 3B is stolen off of the pitcher. If the pitcher is predictable to home plate he becomes very vulnerable to the steal. How could the pitcher be predictable?
a) He could pitch in rhythm. This means that the pitcher comes set and then delivers the ball in the same manner every time. When this manner is determined, the runner can shuffle in the direction of 3B thus shortening his distance. When the pitcher actually goes to deliver the ball to the catcher, the runner gets to full speed as quickly as possible. Some teams stress not crossing over until you realize that the pitcher is in fact throwing home. I disagree. I'm willing to concede that if the pitcher does an inside move on a steal of 3B the runner will most likely be dead.
b) the pitcher could be very slow to the plate. If the pitcher is slow to the plate you might not need to be too fancy. You simply try and get a walking lead and get to full speed at his leg lift.
I think stealing 3B is not practiced nearly enough. Again, the steal is contingent upon the pitcher. If a pithcer isn't monitoring is timing and predictability he is vulnerable to the steal of 3B.
Sunday, December 9, 2007
1st and 3rd defensive absolute.
In 1st and 3rd defensive situations, I believe there is an absolute that must be accounted for. I say "know your priority." I think one of the more common mistakes in coaching this situation is that defensive teams try and stop every play. Instead, teams should have an idea of what they definitely don't want to allow. Amateur baseball players simply don't have the pre-requisite arm strength to be able to defend with diagonal throws across the diamond.
Here is what I mean.
If you don't want the runner on 3rd to score, for whatever reason, you need to put a defense on that explains very clearly to the defense that our priority is the runner on 3rd. The pitcher comes set and only looks at the lead runner. If he is not concerned about the trail runner, why would he look at him. The 1B does not yell "runner" if in fact the runner takes off to 2B. Middle infielders understand that if the lead runner is the priority, they certainly aren't going to cover the bag immediately when the runner breaks. Everything we do says disregard the trail runner. If he wants 2B, he can have 2B.
Now, if you're priority is the trail runner than that is the guy you focus on. Maybe it's late in the game and you're up by 3 or 4 runs. You would gladly trade an out for a run in this situation. Maybe you have a 2 run lead and you simply can't let the tying run in scoring position. Whatever the situation, you record the out and allow the run to score. We are not going to get baited into a rundown and then a throw home and all runners are safe. We have a very clear goal in mind and we ask our players to execute the plan.
The idea of asking amateur players to make professional type of throws is downright ridiculous.
The last caveat to this way of thinking. You must coach according to your priority. If you have priority 3rd base then you wouldn't want to do a fake to 3rd back to 1st play. Then, you would potentially have a rundown between 1st and 2nd with priority to their back. Very dangerous proposition.
Here is what I mean.
If you don't want the runner on 3rd to score, for whatever reason, you need to put a defense on that explains very clearly to the defense that our priority is the runner on 3rd. The pitcher comes set and only looks at the lead runner. If he is not concerned about the trail runner, why would he look at him. The 1B does not yell "runner" if in fact the runner takes off to 2B. Middle infielders understand that if the lead runner is the priority, they certainly aren't going to cover the bag immediately when the runner breaks. Everything we do says disregard the trail runner. If he wants 2B, he can have 2B.
Now, if you're priority is the trail runner than that is the guy you focus on. Maybe it's late in the game and you're up by 3 or 4 runs. You would gladly trade an out for a run in this situation. Maybe you have a 2 run lead and you simply can't let the tying run in scoring position. Whatever the situation, you record the out and allow the run to score. We are not going to get baited into a rundown and then a throw home and all runners are safe. We have a very clear goal in mind and we ask our players to execute the plan.
The idea of asking amateur players to make professional type of throws is downright ridiculous.
The last caveat to this way of thinking. You must coach according to your priority. If you have priority 3rd base then you wouldn't want to do a fake to 3rd back to 1st play. Then, you would potentially have a rundown between 1st and 2nd with priority to their back. Very dangerous proposition.
Saturday, December 8, 2007
The unthinkable, a 3 pitch inning.
Many baseball people have a rule about not allowing a pitcher to throw only 3 pitches to get out of an inning. Let's analyze this way of thinking.
The prevailing theme here is the pitcher needs to work to record outs. Allowing him to pitch one inning with only three pitches seems very detrimental to that cause. A 3 pitch inning allows that pitcher to almost guarantee that he will be able to work late into the game. And, in amateur baseball it is very advantageous to probe into the other teams bullpen. So, never allow a pitcher to have a 3 pitch inning, right?
Not so fast.
The 3 pitch inning can only happen if the batter is permitted to swing at the 1st pitch. Therefore, a managers opinion on first pitch swinging becomes the true salient point. After all, the goal of the offense isn't to tire a pitcher but rather score runs. So, if you believe that a batter can do some good on the first pitch, let 'em hack. But, do you let three consecutive batters hack away on that first pitch?
The first pitch hitter often times feels vulnerable to a pitchers breaking stuff. He believes if he attacks the pitchers first pitch that he could eliminate the offspeed stuff. Certainly, it is solid logic. Many pitchers think to get ahead so why not allow a batter to hit the "get ahead" pitch.
Quite the conundrum. Here is my opinion.
I believe that a pitcher should be asked to work in an inning. 3 pitch innings are no way to apply pressure to a defense let alone the pitcher. However, I can't argue with a kid that says "but coach, that 1st pitch is the best pitch."
The answer lies in the second batter of the inning. If the leadoff hitter leads off with a first pitch out, I believe the next batter should be given the take sign. If the next batter is a first pitch out then you would have two quick outs with a third batter approaching the plate. With 0 on and 2 outs, the most likely way to score a run is on a big blast. That very well could occur on the first pitch. I'm not a big fan of a first pitch take with 2 out and nobody on for this very reason.
Give the second batter a take and see if he can work a count. If he is retired, at least you have made the pitcher work a little bit.
This is certainly not a science but it's a good little debate for those baseball people.
The prevailing theme here is the pitcher needs to work to record outs. Allowing him to pitch one inning with only three pitches seems very detrimental to that cause. A 3 pitch inning allows that pitcher to almost guarantee that he will be able to work late into the game. And, in amateur baseball it is very advantageous to probe into the other teams bullpen. So, never allow a pitcher to have a 3 pitch inning, right?
Not so fast.
The 3 pitch inning can only happen if the batter is permitted to swing at the 1st pitch. Therefore, a managers opinion on first pitch swinging becomes the true salient point. After all, the goal of the offense isn't to tire a pitcher but rather score runs. So, if you believe that a batter can do some good on the first pitch, let 'em hack. But, do you let three consecutive batters hack away on that first pitch?
The first pitch hitter often times feels vulnerable to a pitchers breaking stuff. He believes if he attacks the pitchers first pitch that he could eliminate the offspeed stuff. Certainly, it is solid logic. Many pitchers think to get ahead so why not allow a batter to hit the "get ahead" pitch.
Quite the conundrum. Here is my opinion.
I believe that a pitcher should be asked to work in an inning. 3 pitch innings are no way to apply pressure to a defense let alone the pitcher. However, I can't argue with a kid that says "but coach, that 1st pitch is the best pitch."
The answer lies in the second batter of the inning. If the leadoff hitter leads off with a first pitch out, I believe the next batter should be given the take sign. If the next batter is a first pitch out then you would have two quick outs with a third batter approaching the plate. With 0 on and 2 outs, the most likely way to score a run is on a big blast. That very well could occur on the first pitch. I'm not a big fan of a first pitch take with 2 out and nobody on for this very reason.
Give the second batter a take and see if he can work a count. If he is retired, at least you have made the pitcher work a little bit.
This is certainly not a science but it's a good little debate for those baseball people.
Friday, December 7, 2007
1B's role an an extra base hit.
On a sure double possible triple, the 1B has a distinct and definite role in the relay system that is employed. Some teams will tweak the manner in which it is done, but the following seems to be the most common and simpleist strategy to use.
On a SDPT, the 1B is the trail behind the batter if 1st base is unoccupied. In this manner, the 1B will watch the batter touch the bag and trail in behind him to 2B in case he takes a big turn.
If 1st base is occupied, then home plate is threatened. If that is the case, the 1B must serve as a second cutoff man. He takes his position in line with the cutoff tandem and the catcher in a half arc around the mound. He then listens to the catcher direct him just as he would if he were the lone cutoff man on a single.
The major point that needs addressed is whether 1B is occupied or not. Once the 1B understands this, the rule becomes quite simple.
On a SDPT, the 1B is the trail behind the batter if 1st base is unoccupied. In this manner, the 1B will watch the batter touch the bag and trail in behind him to 2B in case he takes a big turn.
If 1st base is occupied, then home plate is threatened. If that is the case, the 1B must serve as a second cutoff man. He takes his position in line with the cutoff tandem and the catcher in a half arc around the mound. He then listens to the catcher direct him just as he would if he were the lone cutoff man on a single.
The major point that needs addressed is whether 1B is occupied or not. Once the 1B understands this, the rule becomes quite simple.
Thursday, December 6, 2007
Sliding at home plate.
Sliding at home plate is different than any other base(assuming you're not sliding into 1st) and should be taught a little differently.
There are two primary differences.
1) The defensive player awaiting the throw has equipment on. This makes for a more dangerous "collision" if one is to take place. Or at least the threat of a collision changes ones perspective.
2) You can overslide the plate.
Because of both differences, a technique specific to sliding into home plate should be taught. This technique involves deciding what side of the plate to slide on. This can be assisted by the on deck hitter. Once you decide if you're going right or left, the next issue is to slide beyond the catcher on your butt. Sliding on your rear end allows you to touch home plate with your hand. This technique proves very effective when you need to touch the plate while avoiding the catcher in the process.
You literally slide around the catcher but the slide itself does not touch the plate but rather a hand that is free touches home plate as you slide by.
Amateur players will not instinctively practice this slide unless the move is repeated in practice. Very beneficial.
There are two primary differences.
1) The defensive player awaiting the throw has equipment on. This makes for a more dangerous "collision" if one is to take place. Or at least the threat of a collision changes ones perspective.
2) You can overslide the plate.
Because of both differences, a technique specific to sliding into home plate should be taught. This technique involves deciding what side of the plate to slide on. This can be assisted by the on deck hitter. Once you decide if you're going right or left, the next issue is to slide beyond the catcher on your butt. Sliding on your rear end allows you to touch home plate with your hand. This technique proves very effective when you need to touch the plate while avoiding the catcher in the process.
You literally slide around the catcher but the slide itself does not touch the plate but rather a hand that is free touches home plate as you slide by.
Amateur players will not instinctively practice this slide unless the move is repeated in practice. Very beneficial.
Wednesday, December 5, 2007
Does the 1B actually ever make a throw to 3B on a ground ball?
I used to ponder this question when I watched teams take an infield and have a 1B field a ball and fire a rope to 3B who then applied a tag. I got to thinking, "does this ever actually occur?" Up and until this year I would have said no but my thinking has changed a little. Just a little.
Man on 2nd, 0 outs. A hard 1 hopper is fielded by the 1B. The runner is taught to go to 3B on ground balls to the right side. However, the "line drive" holds him slightly. When he sees the ball is down, he will advance to 3B. However, an alert, strong armed 1B may consider throwing a runner out at 3B on that ground ball.
Some things to consider: 1) Is the runner at 2B an "A" runner? 2) How strong of an arm does the 1B have? 3) Is it 0 outs? 4) Is the 3B going to be ready for the throw?
If the runner can move (A runner) you may be less inclined to attempt to throw him out. If the 1B has a candy arm you may be less inclined to throw him out. If there is 1 out, you do not want to attempt this throw. And, you want to make sure that the 3B has actually seen this before. You don't want to pull a rabbit out of your hat and not have someone there to catch the throw.
Having said all that, you'll probably never see it more than a handful of times. Ever.
Man on 2nd, 0 outs. A hard 1 hopper is fielded by the 1B. The runner is taught to go to 3B on ground balls to the right side. However, the "line drive" holds him slightly. When he sees the ball is down, he will advance to 3B. However, an alert, strong armed 1B may consider throwing a runner out at 3B on that ground ball.
Some things to consider: 1) Is the runner at 2B an "A" runner? 2) How strong of an arm does the 1B have? 3) Is it 0 outs? 4) Is the 3B going to be ready for the throw?
If the runner can move (A runner) you may be less inclined to attempt to throw him out. If the 1B has a candy arm you may be less inclined to throw him out. If there is 1 out, you do not want to attempt this throw. And, you want to make sure that the 3B has actually seen this before. You don't want to pull a rabbit out of your hat and not have someone there to catch the throw.
Having said all that, you'll probably never see it more than a handful of times. Ever.
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
Corners on the lines or not?
Late in the game with a 1 run lead or tied, coaches will sometimes make a decision defensively that has a big impact on the outcome of the game.
Do I put my corner infielders on the line to protect against an extra base hit or do I leave them in normal position? Sure, there is more to a no doubles defense than the corner infielders but I treat a "no doubles" defense separately when it comes to defensive players.
I truly believe this is the equivalent to a prevent defense in football. You want to protect a lead so you guard against a big play. In the meantime, exposing yourself to the mundane single and sacrifice. It is definitely a debate that rages among managers late in the game. Every situation is different but I would suggest that guarding the lines is more detrimental than playing at normal depth.
Big innings occur when multiple hits/walks/ hit by pitches happen. And, usually these happen when a pitchers tempo is disrupted and he is forced into the uncomfortable stretch position. The mundane singe can do all of these things.
Leave the corner defenders in normal depth and let them defend against the larger part of the field. In the process, you take away more hits but maybe not the big hit.
If you watch a manager align his corner infielders late in the game it tells you an awful lot about the type of manager that he is.
Do I put my corner infielders on the line to protect against an extra base hit or do I leave them in normal position? Sure, there is more to a no doubles defense than the corner infielders but I treat a "no doubles" defense separately when it comes to defensive players.
I truly believe this is the equivalent to a prevent defense in football. You want to protect a lead so you guard against a big play. In the meantime, exposing yourself to the mundane single and sacrifice. It is definitely a debate that rages among managers late in the game. Every situation is different but I would suggest that guarding the lines is more detrimental than playing at normal depth.
Big innings occur when multiple hits/walks/ hit by pitches happen. And, usually these happen when a pitchers tempo is disrupted and he is forced into the uncomfortable stretch position. The mundane singe can do all of these things.
Leave the corner defenders in normal depth and let them defend against the larger part of the field. In the process, you take away more hits but maybe not the big hit.
If you watch a manager align his corner infielders late in the game it tells you an awful lot about the type of manager that he is.
Monday, December 3, 2007
Tagging on a fly when at 2B.
When is it a good time to tag at 2B? Well, there are certainly many factors to consider.
First of all, if there is 1 out you will be less aggressive in tagging to go to 3B than with 0 outs. However, after watching a college game where a players scored from 2B on a tag I began thinking about this concept. I suppose, if in the back of your mind you think it is possible to score from 2B, it is a great play to think tag at 2B with 1 out.
The ball was hit very high and deep to right center field. I think it is very important to understand that the height of the ball is important in determining whether to tag or not. If the ball is hit on a line you could never really justify tagging. If the ball drops you would be expected to score from 2B. If the ball is hit high in the air you could assume that the ball would be caught therefore justifying tagging at 2B.
Here is the way I see it. At 2B, a ball hit to the runners left indicates a tag opportunity. Very rarely do runners tag on balls hit to a runners right. So, fly ball to a runners left means tag opportunity. At least, he should think tag first and then adjust. If the outfielder is on a dead sprint(numbers on his jersey going away fast) after the ball it certainly wouldn't be a prudent play to stand waiting to tag at 2B. But, if the ball is high in the air and the outfielder is starting to camp under the ball a tag is definitely a possibility.
Very advanced baserunners will sometimes go 15-20 feet off of 2B and then see what course of action is necessary. If the outfielder is moving away from the infield it is unreasonable to think that he could catch the ball and turn and record an out at 3B. So, in this manner you are tagging at 2B without standing on 2B initally.
This concept is one that needs stressed on baserunning repetitions.
First of all, if there is 1 out you will be less aggressive in tagging to go to 3B than with 0 outs. However, after watching a college game where a players scored from 2B on a tag I began thinking about this concept. I suppose, if in the back of your mind you think it is possible to score from 2B, it is a great play to think tag at 2B with 1 out.
The ball was hit very high and deep to right center field. I think it is very important to understand that the height of the ball is important in determining whether to tag or not. If the ball is hit on a line you could never really justify tagging. If the ball drops you would be expected to score from 2B. If the ball is hit high in the air you could assume that the ball would be caught therefore justifying tagging at 2B.
Here is the way I see it. At 2B, a ball hit to the runners left indicates a tag opportunity. Very rarely do runners tag on balls hit to a runners right. So, fly ball to a runners left means tag opportunity. At least, he should think tag first and then adjust. If the outfielder is on a dead sprint(numbers on his jersey going away fast) after the ball it certainly wouldn't be a prudent play to stand waiting to tag at 2B. But, if the ball is high in the air and the outfielder is starting to camp under the ball a tag is definitely a possibility.
Very advanced baserunners will sometimes go 15-20 feet off of 2B and then see what course of action is necessary. If the outfielder is moving away from the infield it is unreasonable to think that he could catch the ball and turn and record an out at 3B. So, in this manner you are tagging at 2B without standing on 2B initally.
This concept is one that needs stressed on baserunning repetitions.
Sunday, December 2, 2007
MLB (why they never hire a college coach?)
The NBA and the NFL have hired the best of the best from the college game. Why hasn't major league baseball done the same. Quite simply, there is just too much politics in the game to alow it.
Football and Basketball do not have a minor league system. They are not provided an opportunity to develop hundreds of players to develop major league talent. They must draft efficiently and develop that talent immediately to play on their top level rosters. In major league baseball, players get sent to their minor league teams to develop major league skills. It is this minor league system that is truly a deterrant to hiring top notch coaching.
When a player plays in an organization and doesn't make the big leagues, he is often times rewarded by being hired as a minor league coach. The good ole boys club at its finest. These minor league coaches become major league managers and literally block all college coaches from entering the ranks of major league baseball.
Not that a college coach would want to coach major league baseball. I think college baseball is fresh and exciting while pro baseball is stagnant.
Major league coaches have an air of smugness when it comes to how to play the game. They believe that if they haven't thought of it or developed it, it must not have any merit.
Oregon St. is a two time national champion. You would think that major league baseball would be knocking down his door. Think again.
Football and Basketball do not have a minor league system. They are not provided an opportunity to develop hundreds of players to develop major league talent. They must draft efficiently and develop that talent immediately to play on their top level rosters. In major league baseball, players get sent to their minor league teams to develop major league skills. It is this minor league system that is truly a deterrant to hiring top notch coaching.
When a player plays in an organization and doesn't make the big leagues, he is often times rewarded by being hired as a minor league coach. The good ole boys club at its finest. These minor league coaches become major league managers and literally block all college coaches from entering the ranks of major league baseball.
Not that a college coach would want to coach major league baseball. I think college baseball is fresh and exciting while pro baseball is stagnant.
Major league coaches have an air of smugness when it comes to how to play the game. They believe that if they haven't thought of it or developed it, it must not have any merit.
Oregon St. is a two time national champion. You would think that major league baseball would be knocking down his door. Think again.
Saturday, December 1, 2007
How should you call for a pop up?
" I got it." "Ball, Ball, Ball" "Me,Me,Me"
There are so many different ways to demand the ball. Is there a best way to call the ball? Let's investigate.
I suppose as long as the ball is caught it doesn't really matter how the ball is called for. However, not all fly balls are created equal. The harder the fly ball the more detailed you need to be with your technique.
I prefer the "me,me,me" "you,you,you" method and here is why.
Typically an outfielder only calls for the ball when he has a chance at the ball. I really like the idea of communicating if you can't catch a ball also. If two players are converging and one of them knows that the other one absolutely can not get to the ball and he calls "you,you,you" the other player can go at it full speed.
But, if you are chasing a ball and are not sure whether or not your teammate can get there there will most assuredly be some indecision. That indecision can cause a ball to drop.
If you can catch it most definitely - "me,me,me" If you can't catch it then - "you,you,you"
There are so many different ways to demand the ball. Is there a best way to call the ball? Let's investigate.
I suppose as long as the ball is caught it doesn't really matter how the ball is called for. However, not all fly balls are created equal. The harder the fly ball the more detailed you need to be with your technique.
I prefer the "me,me,me" "you,you,you" method and here is why.
Typically an outfielder only calls for the ball when he has a chance at the ball. I really like the idea of communicating if you can't catch a ball also. If two players are converging and one of them knows that the other one absolutely can not get to the ball and he calls "you,you,you" the other player can go at it full speed.
But, if you are chasing a ball and are not sure whether or not your teammate can get there there will most assuredly be some indecision. That indecision can cause a ball to drop.
If you can catch it most definitely - "me,me,me" If you can't catch it then - "you,you,you"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
