Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Don't intentionally walk him by telling the umpire

In amateur baseball, the intentional walk can be issued without having to throw a pitch. I contend there is one time where you should throw the four balls rather than simply assign the batter to 1B. Well, maybe not all four balls but at least two.

Here's what I'm talking about.

If you suspect a squeeze, you should intentionally walk the batter by pitching out. Let's say the winning run gets to 3B. You suspect the squeeze could be on. You also understand the idea that all runners that reach base behind the winning run are completely insignificant. Why not pitch out to see if you can catch the offensive team in a squeeze?

Worst case scenario? You simply intentionally walk the batter and face the next hitter.

And, if you think that the offense might squueze this time? Do it again.

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Bottom of the ninth. Winning run on 3rd.

This baseball scenario brings about many questions. Now, if there are two outs it's rather straight forward. But, what if there are less than two outs?

Do you simply bring the infield in? Do you bring a fifth infielder in? You must make sure your outfielders are at a depth that allows them to throw all potential "tags" out.

It's never easy.

What must be considered is if there are other runners on base at the time. If the runner at 3B is there by himself, there is a good chance that bringing the infield in will stop the "contact" play. You can't guarantee that the pitcher will execute the way you want him to but you can rest easy that the offensive team wants a runner in scoring position after a gound ball is fielded. It's not a sure thing, but it's a good chance the runner won't break if no one is behind him.

If there is a runner behind him. It could be 1st base or 2nd base- you can bet that a good baseball coach will have the contact play on. Put some pressure on the defense and all trail runners will advance anyway. You are guaranteed a runner in scoring position after the play if you send the runner on contact. Because of this, I believe the defense must bring five infielders into play. Remove an outfielder and go with five infielders.

If the pitcher has command and you trust his location, walk the bases loaded and set up forces everywhere. It might dissuade the other team from the suicide and it allows the double play to be an option. Again, this is only really an option if the pitcher can work with the bases loaded.

One thing is for certain. The defense is in a tough spot. But, understanding the contingencies of offensive strategy helps in defending the situation.

Monday, April 28, 2008

Why the .400 hitter is extinct.

I know there are a lot of theories as to why the .400 hitter has not happened in a seriously long time. In fact, the last person to do it was Ted Willimas in 1941. I have my own theories.

I don't think that the pitching is a variable that should be of considerable discussion. I think there are some unbelievable arms throwing today. I also think that bullpens are a part of baseball moreso than they were in yesteryear. The bullpen issue is a double edged sword when it comes to arguing this case. The closers that most teams have are legitimate late inning arms that are very difficult to hit against. These one inning specialists have nasty changeups, nasty sliders and overpowering fastballs. I would contend that these specialists would make it harder to hit .400. But, in that bullpen are middle inning guys that certainly wouldn't qualify as "tough" arms to hit against. For argument sake, let's say that this dichotomy in the bullpen effectively negates the pitching argument.

So, if the pitching isn't harder, is the hitting weaker? No. Plain and simple- no. There are video advantages that players have today that give them advantages that older players didn't have. Also, I think a claim could be made that hitters are bigger and stronger than they were at one time. Shouldn't bigger and stronger make it easier to hit?

So what is it?

I believe the .400 hitter is extinct for two primary reasons.

1) Team defense is dramatically better. There are fleet footed outfielders all over the field. There are slick fielding infielders that can cover more range on the infield than ever before. Plain and simple- there aren't as many holes out there to find.

2) Field maintenance is better. In past years, there was an opportunity every now and again for a bad hop single. Not anymore. For the most part, fields are so well kept that players simply can't rely on that bad hop to help boost the batting average.

The game is simply not the same game that was played years ago. Besides the obvious differences with players(size and speed and pitching beliefs, I believe that the fields that today's players play on affect batting average significantly.

Sunday, April 27, 2008

A good time to try and advance to 3B with 2 outs.

Typically, it goes against all conventional wisdom to attempt to get to 3B with 2 outs. You're supposed to be satisfied with being on 2B and 2 outs. But, there is one time when a team can gain a serious advantage.

And, I'm not talking about creating a 1st and 3rd situation. Although, that would help also.

I'm alluding to the pitcher that might have his hard sinking "out" pitch taken away.

A pitcher that has a "split." A pitcher that has a strikeout curveball that breaks into the dirt. Or, even a catcher that has difficulty blocking pitches in the dirt. All of the aforementioned issues are legitimate reasons for attempting to reach third base with 2 outs.

A runner 90 ft. away certainly plants a seed of doubt in the pitcher's mind.

Again, maybe it's not textbook but it certainly has merit when considering the options that it reveals for the offense.

Saturday, April 26, 2008

The perfect storm for a push bunt(RHB)

The bunt for a base hit is an art when it comes to manufacturing runs. Recognizing when to bunt for a hit is an art within itself. The scenario that I'm about to outline doesn't necessarily need to have a righty in the box but it does require a bunt to the 1B side of the infield.

Here's the perfect storm to which I am referring.

Man on 1st and less than two outs. Although nobody out is preferred(just in case the batter is retired), you can do it with 1 out also.

A lefty on the mound is required. The lefthander falls to the 3B side of the mound. This makes him vulnerable to the bunt on the 1B side of the mound. The 1B holds the runner on 1st base making the "4 hole" larger. The 2B slides to the bag making the "4 hole" even larger.

The batter recognizing all these variables in his favor, bunts the ball past the pitcher and in the direction of the 1B's backhand and the 2B's glove hand. The batter's goal is to beat the pitcher to the mound.

If the bunt is past the pitcher and it takes the 1B away from the bag, the fleet batter will certainly more than likely have himself a hit.

It certainly beats the ole sacrifice bunt.

Friday, April 25, 2008

Righty 1B vs. Lefty 1B.

It's one of four positions that can be played by a player that is either right or lefthanded. What oppotunity does each present?

The only manner in which this matters is if you have some built in offensive packages that can be used to exploit the handedness of the 1B.

Lets look at the righthanded firstbaseman. The righthanded 1B is lined up to throw home with little difficulty. In other words, if he receives the ball at 1B he can throw to home plate with squaring beforehand. He is already squared to his target. The righthanded 1B becomes vulnerable to the throw to 2B. With a righty on 1st, you might be more inclined to steal 2B off of a lefty. Knowing that if you get picked off there is still a considerable burden on the 1B who must clear for the throw.

The lefthanded 1B is facing 2B when he receives the ball. This makes the bunt a little more problematic. It also allows the lefty an easier opportunity to apply a tag at 1st and to record any out at 2B for that matter. Where the lefty 1B has a difficulty is with a hurried throw home.

This comes into play with what I call a double first lift. Runners on 1st and 3rd. Lefthanded picther lifts his leg and both runners take off. If the throw goes to 1B, the 1B has a potential play at home plate. However, the runner at 3B had a big head start and the 1B needs to unload quickly. The time needed to square his shoulders could be costly.

Granted, the play seldom happens. But, in amateur baseball when runs are always at a premium, noting the handedness of the 1B can have an impact on some of these plays.

In general, I would much rather prefer a lefty 1B over a righty because of the ease of the throws to 2B. Yet, here is one example where a lefty 1B is at a disadvantage.

Thursday, April 24, 2008

Man in scoring position. On deck batter ready?

When a runner gets into scoring position, the on deck batter becomes a critical element to coaching the baserunners. He must be absolutely ready to assist the runner who is attempting to score.

Here are examples of what I'm talking about.

Man on 3rd with 1 out. Infield is in which alerts the on deck batter that if the runner breaks on contact, there will be a play at the plate. The on deck batter should be prepare to signal which direction he would like the runner to slide at home plate.

Also, man on 2B. A hard single to an outfielder means there could be a play at home plate. The on deck batter has more time to react on this play but nonetheless he needs to react to the play as it develops.

The absolute worst thing that could happen in this situation is the runner attempting to score gets tagged out without sliding at all. And, with a very adroit catcher it can be difficult to identify the direction in which to slide.

On deck batter needs to be on high alert when runners get in scoring position. There "coaching" could be the difference between a run an an out.

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

The "throw" is more important than the "catch"

When fielding a ground ball, it's actually more important to focus on the throw than fielding the ball. I know that sounds counter intuitive. I mean, how can the throw be more important than fielding the ball? You can't throw the ball if you don't field it first.

Here is the premise behind that assertion.

If you boot a ground ball, the batter gets 1B.

If you field a ground ball and throw it away, the batter gets 2B.

So, although fungoes are hit and proper fielding technique is stressed and dissected, the emphasis should actually fall on the proper throwing technique. There is a base at stake.

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Could you give contingency signals?

Lately, I've been thinking about how football has audibles and baseball doesn't really. I discussed in an earlier blog entry the idea about changing plays based upon certain signs given. In other words, if the squeeze is given but the runner at 2nd notices that a pitchout has been signaled, he could yell for the play to be cancelled.

Taking this line of thinking one step further. What if the coach could signal a play that is contingent on the player seeing something.

Here's what I have in mind.

1) Runner on 2B. A sign could be given that says "If you see a curveball- steal." It would not be a traditional steal sign. It is simply steal on the curveball.

2) Runner at 1st. A sign could be given that says "If the count gets to 0-2 or 1-2, I want you to run."

I think there are times when expressing your thought process to the players is critical for them to understand what it is that you are trying to convey. If a sign could be given as soon as the batter steps in the box, you may not have to give another sign the rest of the at bat. This certainly would confound the opposing team when the runner actually took off on that 1-2 curveball.

Another example of how baseball simply is behind the times.

Monday, April 21, 2008

Break up a "no no" with a bunt?

Here's another one of those baseball rules. Never break up a no hitter with a bunt for a hit attempt. I'm not sure when it is appropriate and when it's not appropriate. But, I do know that if and when a player would bunt for a hit to break up a no hitter he would be vilified to no end.

What ever happened to playing to win the game?

I mean if you're losing 2-0 in the last inning, why not bunt? Because some "rule" says you can't break up a no hitter with a bunt. That's more spurious baseball talk that makes zero sense.

Play to win the game. If it means bunting for a base hit, then that's exactly what you do.

Sunday, April 20, 2008

Batting stances evolve to hide weaknesses.

When you watch a guy get in the box they tell you a little about them simply by the way they stand.

Every batter has suffered through those times when they just can't seem to get something going. They try different things and eventually the stance changes. Quite simply, it's one of the easiest things to change. Changing someone's actual swing is significantly more difficult. Changing the way they see the ball is much easier.

That guy that has a hard time with the inside pitch? He'll open his stance to alow his hips a head start. Throw this guy hard in anyway.

That guy that has a difficult time with the outside pitch? He'll close his stance and appear to be vulnerable inside. Avoide the inside of the plate at all costs. Throw this guy outside.

Guys that squat in the box? They want the ball up. They are trying to make all pitches appear up.

Guys that stand tall want the ball down. They are trying to make all pitches appear down.

The stance is the cover to the book. Sometimes it pays to read the cover.

Saturday, April 19, 2008

Bunt for a hit with a man on 2B and 2 outs?

There are a lot of traditions in professional baseball that have evolved over the ages. One of which is you NEVER bunt for a hit with a runner on 2B and 2 outs.

Why?

The theory goes that you don't want to "pass the buck" to someone else. If there is a run to drive in, then you should drive him in immediately rather than asking someone else to do it. Bunting for a basehit may advance the runner but it probably wouldn't score him from 2B.

I think this is one of professional baseball's stupid traditions. Seriously, you mean to tell me that there is never a time that bunting for a basehit is a good option when the infield is in a best range defense. They're literally trying to keep everything in the infield and willing to give up a bunt for a hit. But, professional baseball says "don't take what the defense is giving you." Rather, they want everyone to play by these archaic rules that someone decided was sound philosophy.

Let's see, runner on 2B with the 2 hitter up. Defense is in best range and trying to prevent the run from scoring. The 2 hole hitter probably controls the bat pretty well. Why not bunt for a hit? It would more than likely create a 1st and 3rd situation with the 3 hitter up. In amateur baseball that would put pressure on the defense in any number of ways.

But, God forbid that occur in professional baseball. That two hitter is supposed to abandon all bunt possibilities and hit into a defense that is designed to stop the batted ball from going to the outfield.

It's just amazing the ineptitude that permeates baseball at the professional levels. Oh, there is certainly an argument to made in certain situations to not bunt for a hit. But NEVER?

Joe Morgan would have you believe so.

Friday, April 18, 2008

The anatomy of an at bat.

Runners were on 1st and 3rd. There was 1 out.

My team was leading 2-0 in the top of the fifth inning. I had average speed on the bases. My two hitter(left handed batter) was up against a right handed pitcher that had a fastball and curveball. The batter was a C runner. That means he is a definite candidate for a double play.

I approached the runner at 3B and said "Contact. Out by a lot get in a rundown. Don't let them turn a double play." My thinking here is my runner on third could draw a throw rather than let them turn two on my #2 hitter.

With a lefty up there is a huge hole between first and second. This gives my lefty a great opportunity to shoot the ball through the hole. I'm hoping the count works in his favor so he can get a fastball that he could possibly drive through that hole.

I signal my traditional "first and third" sign to both runners to alert them that our 1st and 3rd package is available. This also alerts them to the fact that a fake to third back to first play is available to the pitcher. However, with my 2 hitter up and 1 out- nothing is urgent so I don't put anything on. BALL ONE.

1-0 count. Advantage count. The chances are good that he'll hit his pitch and not rollover on a pitch for that dreaded double play opportunity. Signal 1st and 3rd but again, NOTHING ON. FOUL BALL STRAIGHT BACK.

1-1 count. We've got a 2 run lead. That run would be really nice but it certainly isn't do or die. For that matter, I'm going to eschew the hit and run. The hit and run would ask the batter to hit the ball on the ground while sending the runner on 3B contact. Unnecessary to give up an out at this point. Plus, it's my two hitter. A big inning could be coming. I'll settle for a fake steal with the runner at 1st. This will allow me to see infield coverage and to possibly move the middle infelders out of position. Runner fakes. Runner call is made and the ball is taken high. BALL TWO.

2-1 count. If I'm not willing to hit and run 1-1, why would I do it in a more advantage count? I wouldn't. Nothing really to do here. I might start the runner in a 3 ball count so I'll fake steal again. I love doing this with a lefty in the box because it's so effective. The catcher really relies on that runner call. Fake steal again and this time the ball is low. BALL THREE. The shortstop is definitely leaving too early. A big reason is because he's not in double play depth.

3-1 count. Not only could I stay out of a double play by starting the runner but now I might be able to score two runs if this 3-1 pitch could be hit in the gap. Do I start the runner with a "3 ball" hit and run? If the batter takes strike 2 and the runner gets thrown out I look really bad. Not only do I lose my man on 3rd with 1 out advantge but I might prevent the 3 hitter from having a big RBI opportunity. Remember- I still have that coveted hole open over there. I choose to keep the runner at 1st. Of course, I'm still going on contact which hopefully allows me a chance to prevent the double play. STRIKE TWO LOOKING. Wow. Good thing I chose not to start the runner.

3-2 count. Start the runner or not start the runner again? What appears to be the best chance for the defense to turn a double play? Since I have average speed at first, if the batter strikes out what are the chances that the runner would also be thrown out at 2B? When I faked the steal earlier in the at bat, the SS went to the bag which leads me to believe that they would try a throw him out 1st/3rd option. But, I don't think my guy will strike out. He's had some good at bats off this guy before. If I start him I take the batted ball double play out of the equation. It could open up a base for my 3 hitter but I have another lefty behind him if they choose to walk him. I'm willing to risk the open base by starting the runner. I'm giving the "3 ball hit and run." Runner takes off and the ball is hit in the air to the centerfielder. Man on 3B tags and scores. Runner at 1st sees the fly ball and retreats.

Man on 1st and 2 out, with the 3 hitter up. And it continues again.

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Calling off the dogs protocol.

When the game gets out of hand, what is expected of each team? For that matter, when is the game out of hand?

Amateur baseball is so different from professional in this respect. Amateur baseball simply doesn't have the depth of professional baseball. Defensive substitutions can impact a game in a deleterious manner. Replace a starter with a backup and that routine out becomes a base runner. Base runners become runs and all of a sudden you've got a game. So, when should a team start to back off and what does "backing off" look like?

In amateur baseball where there is a mercy rule I believe it is perfectly acceptable to play to the mercy rule. In other words, win the game as soon as possible. This saves arms and quite simply saves energy. So, when considering when to call off the dogs, I don't subscribe to the 7 run,8 run,9 run lead. To me, calling off the dogs exists only when the game is not in doubt and a game will not be shortened.

However, if you do subscribe to calling off the dogs, here are some guidelines to consider.

I think a team can back off offensively well before it backs off defensively. As a team begins to pull away LATE IN THE GAME, an offensive coach should not give signs (this would imply that he is still coaching). He should remind his team not to take the extra base but to take anything that is given to him. Showing a team up can also manifest itself in not taking a base on wild pitches and passed balls.

Defensively, calling off the dogs manifests itself by not holding runners on, not attempting pickoffs, not jockeying runners at 2nd base. It is imporatnt to undertand that calling off the dogs does not mean that a pitcher should not throw breaking balls in fastball counts. It's imporatnt to understand that pitchers should still compete and still attempt to throw their pitches in certain counts. It doesn't mean that pitchers should simply throw fastballs because the game is out of hand.

When the game gets out of hand it is always a delicate situation. However, understanding some certain basics about protocol gives the head coach on both teams some proper guidelines as to how they should react.

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

1B. Hold the runner or play behind.

Typically, when a runner is on 1B, the 1B holds the runner on 1st. But, certainly there are times when it is prudent to play behind the runner.

Playing behind the runner is essential if the manager or coach believes that the potential run on 1B is an unimportant run. If the head coach thinks that it is more important to get outs than hold runners at 1st base than the first baseman should play behind the runner at first.

Here is the one caveat though. You must be aware of your infield capabilities when doing this. It's just not as easy as saying "we've got a 2 run lead and it's the seventh innning." Keeping the runner at 1B allows infielders to get force outs at 2nd base. This throw is certainly easier and it takes some pressure off of amatuer infielders. If the coach believes the run is unimprtant yet believes the risk is worthy of keeping the force at 2nd- then he may choose to continue to hold him on.

Furthermore, if the coach believes the likelihood of hitting the ball through the "4 hole" his unlikely, he may choose to continue to hold the runner on. This likelihood could be based upon the pitcher's tendencies for contact or the batters tendencies for contact. If a finesse pitcher is on the mound and a righty hitter is up- maybe it doesn't make sense for the 1B to play behind the runner and just give the runner 2nd base.

Again, recognizing important runs vs. unimporatnt runs is the easy part. Deciding where to play the 1B, a little more tricky.

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Bunt for a hit after a home run

When a guy hits a home run it can be deflating to the defensse. The defense sits on their heels a little bit feeling sorry for themselves. Baseball has developed a little "salt in the wound" philosophy with regards to the next batter.

Quite simply, the next batter often times will bunt for a hit.

Look for it. It's premise is based upon surprise.

The last batter just went yard and now the next guy is going to bunt? Absolutely.

Monday, April 14, 2008

Runners at 2nd and 3rd. Running into an out on tag.

This scenario is one of those baseball plays that goes against some basic tenets. You're never supposed to make the last out at 3B. But, this play seems to dismiss those basic rules in favor of trying to steal a run. The final out at 3B is made in an attempt to score a run at the plate. So, in that way, the out at 3B is a "sacrificial" out to gain a greater product.

A fly ball is hit to one of the outfielders. If the ball is hit to rightfield the runner at 2B should go back to tag as an initial read. This makes the running into an out play here more instinctual. However, if the ball is hit to the leftfielder the runner is trained to walk with the flyball and to read the ball accordingly. It is less instinctive to tag on balls hit to the leftfielder. Yet, it might be more prudent to actually tag on the flyball to left field.

The trail runner in a 2nd and 3rd situation is very important becuase he is the runner that is running into an out to score that run. When the fly ball is hit it is important for the trail runner to tag as the lead runner tags. When the lead runner takes off the trail runner takes off and reads the lead runner. If the lead runner continues home in what looks like a bang bang play, the trail runner takes off to draw a throw.

The novice baseball fan would criticize the trail runner for making the last out at 3B. The more intelligent baseball fan understands that the trail runner just gave himself up for a run that may have been in jeopardy.

Sunday, April 13, 2008

HItting- The top hand and the bottom hand

Hitting a baseball is a two handed process. Yet, usually one of the two hands play a dominant role in the swing. The best of hitters have coordination with both hands and both hands work in conjunction to provide a consistent powerful swing.

Each hand on the bat provides a distinct purpose for the swing. Understanding what each hand does allows players to improve their swing and also monitor the swing during the course of the game.

The lead arm's role acts as a lever to the core. As the core rotates violently to attack the ball, the lead arm stays connected to the core providing an opportunity for the bat to come into the hitting zone with maximum bat speed. Some signs of betrayal by the lead arm are when there is too much flex in the lead elbow. Also, if the hands do not move backwards before moving forwards the lead arm(technically it's more than ust the lead arm. It's the lead arm and the scapula complex located behind the lead shoulder) is not functioning properly.

The top hand is responsible for bringing the barrel to the ball. If a hitter has a lazy top hand you'll see a lot of opposite field hits, pop ups and even swing and misses. The top hand definitely is a barrel controller. You may not drive the ball if you hit it but you should be able to put the barrel on the ball if you have a solid top hand.

There are so many permutations of swings and dominance of hands. Understanding how each hand works enables the hitter to have a better understanding of his swing and what might be a proper fix.

Saturday, April 12, 2008

5-4-3-2 triple play. "How's it happen?"

Although the triple play is a an odd occurrence, this play is one that I could definitely see happening more often than some others. The reason- it's such a tough read for the runner at 3B in a 1st/3rd 0 out situaton. In fact, I saw Barry Bonds make the final out of this triple play at home plate in a game a couple of years ago.

Heres what happens.

The 3B coach needs to tell the runner on 3B what is read should be. Generally, the runner at 3B should have a contact read with runners at 1st and 3B. This is the easiset way to communicate to a runner at 3B. It allows the runner to prevent a double play but it also could prevent a runner from being at 3B with 1 out. There is a more advanced read but it certainly would take ample time to practice.

A may more advanced read would be "on the ground up the middle go but at the corners wait until they start the double play to break." This would allow the run to score if in fact the ball was hit to the middle infielders who could turn a double play. But if the ball was hit at the 3B, the runner would hold until the 3B went to 2B to start the double play until breaking. This would hopefully guarantee the run scoring while the defense attempts a double play.

The very big caveat would be if the 3B threw it to the 2B who would then throw home rather than throwing to 1B. This could possibly make it a bang, bang play at the plate.

All of this confusion casues the triple play becase the runner at 3B is attempting to make a very, very difficult read. The ball is hit to the 3B and the runner holds. Upon seeing the ball thrown to 2B he makes a break for home. Depending on the speed at which the double play is turned and the speed of the runner at 3B there possibly could be a play at the plate. This is how the triple play occurs in this scenario. It begins with the very difficult "professional" read.

At amateur levels of baseball this read should very simply be a contact read if the defense has the ability to turn a double play. If the defense can't turn a double play you would treat it as an independent situation with a man on 3B.

Lots to consider with runners on the corners.

Friday, April 11, 2008

Call a game- not a bullpen!

Sometimes coaches and catchers get in trouble by thinking they need to throw all their pitches in a game. Rather, they need to throw what effectively retires each hitter.

A pitcher enters a game with a repertoire of pitches. These pitches may or may entail his full complement of pitches. On some days he may have more stuff than on other days. But, regardless he has what would be considered his "in play" pitches. These are the pitches that he should feel comfortable throwing in game situations.

Once he takes the mound, he needs to understand what he can throw to get the hitter out. And, this does not necessarily mean that all of his pitches should come into play. Maybe the fastball is all he needs to throw to a certain batter to retire that batter. Yeah, he's got a curveball. Yeah, he's got a slider. But, that doesn't mean that he needs to throw those pitches.

The same is true with a breaking pitch. Let's say you throw two good curveballs for strike one and strike two. Maybe in a bullpen setting you would throw a "gap" fastball 0-2 and then finish him off with another curveball. I contend that at amateur levels of baseball, why not throw a third straight curveball and simply end it there. If he hasn't swung at a curveball yet, there is a chance that he won't swing at the third one.

I think sometimes players fall into the rut of throwing a bullpen on the mound rather than simply trying to retire the batter.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Inside move or glove side pick at 2B?

When attempting a pickoff at 2B, the pitcher has one of two optons to consider. Should he spin towards his glove side and make a throw to 2B, or should he inside move and attempt a pickoff at 2B?

The first thing that needs seriously considered is whether the pitcher has the coordination to execute the glove side pick. It is a dynamic pickoff move that has the pitcher spin towards 2B trying to throw to the bag. At amateur levels of baseball this is a difficult proposition. If it can't be done, it shouldn't be tried.

So, the discussion as to which pickoff to use assumes that a pitcher is capable of both moves.

The glove side move is usually used in conjunction with wahat is commonly referred to as the "daylight" play. In other words, when the SS begins to move towards 2B, the pitcher sees space or daylight between the SS and the baserunner and he turns and fires to the bag in an attempt to retire the runner. It is definitely a timing play and requires lots and lots of repetitions. This glove side pickoff is a good thing to do with 2 out as sometimes the runner attempt to get to big of a lead. And, if the ball is thrown into centerfield, the offense still needs a hit by most accounts to score the run.

The inside move is a deception move. It is primarily used in 1 out situations where the base runner might be trying to gain an advantage by getting to 3B with 1 out. The pitcher lets the runner at 2B think he is fine with his lead and the middle infielders are at a comfortable distance away. When the pitcher lifts his leg and the runner at 2B begins to steal 3B, the pitcher swivels inside for the pickoff at 2B.

The major difference between the two is timing vs. deception.

If the pickoff at 2B is what you're looking for- the glove side move is the method of choice. If the deception of throwing home is what you're looking for- the inside move is the method of choice.

Keep an eye on the outs when watching these pickoff plays. The number of outs are a great indicator as to which one professional teams will use.

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Winning run on 1st, 0 outs. Bunt your best hitter?

This situation is one of those tricky spots. Of course, there are so many variables that go into whether or not it is a good idea. Some of those variables are the pitcher, the hitter protecting the best hitter, the "best" hitters previous at bats. But, in general, let's consider the merits given the fact that the pitcher is average, the next hitter is good but not the "best" and the "best" hitter has had some decent success in the game already.

What to do?

Statistics actually say that at the major league level almost no advantage is gained by putting a runner at 2B with 1 out vs. a runner at 1 with 0 outs.

I contend that at lower levels of amateur baseball the more chances that your best hitters have to hit, the better off your team will be offensively. Although it makes some sense to think about bunting your best hitter, I think taking the bat out of his hands is exactly what the defense would prefer.

He only gets 3-4 at bats a game. Let him hit!

Of course, there are always exceptions. WINK WINK.

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Hitters mistake - "swing if it's a strike"

Many young hitters get in the batters box with the mentality that they are going to swing if the ball is a strike. This is a defensive mentality and needs to be adjusted if the hitter is going to have success. The proper mentality is "I'm going to swing unless it's a ball."

There is definitely a fine line between the two approaches but make no mistake about it- you can not be a successful hitter if you are waiting to see if the pitch is a strike. You must assume it will be a strike and take the ball.

I believe that you can tell whether a hitter has the proper approach even if he never takes a swing in a game. How? By simply watching how he takes pitches. Successful hitters take pitches with their legs as their initiate the swing with their legs. When you see a hitter stand and watch a pitch crosss the plate without some leg action in their take, he often is using the "no,no,no, YES" approach.

Employing a "yes,yes,yes, NO" approach as a hitter is critical and is noticeable during the taking of a pitch.

What are some symptoms of a hitter with this approach?

1) A lot of takes
2) A lot of opposite field contact
3) A lot of foul balls back and out of play.

This approach simply delays the barrel where the batter chooses not to swing at all or if he does swing it is slow and delayed.

Monday, April 7, 2008

Pinch hit in the middle of an at bat?

It certainly is unorthodox to pull a batter in the middle of an at bat. But, does it have merit and when would you consider doing such a thing?

I think it's perfecty reasonable to understand the difference between advantage counts and disadvantage counts. Being aware of what your team can do in each of these counts is critical to managing your players to the best of their ability. Here are some examples of changing a focus as the count changes.

1- Man on 1st, 0 outs. You have a batter come to the box and you ask him to swing away. The batter takes a feable swing at a first pitch and the count goes 0-1. Well, you now a decision to make. If this batter is not the best of bunters you may choose to pinch hit as a bun option. If the defense believes the bunt is on you always have a hit and run option.

2- A runner advances to 2B during the at bat. A batter is in the box with a man on 1st base. He may be asked to bunt the runner to 2B. But, after a wild pitch moves the runner into scoring position, you may want to reconsider the batter in the box. A better hitter may be the more prudent play here. Maybe even a lefty hitter that has a propensity to hit the ball to the right side.

3- A runner advances to 3B during the at bat. A runner at 3B brings the safety squeeze into play. Imagine this. A runner at 2B with 1 out. The runner steals 3B with a 1-1 count. Now, there is a runner at 3B with a 2-1 count. Maybe there is a player on your bench that is an excellent safety squeeze guy. Pinch hit and give it a shot. If the defense pitches out- you're still safe. However, knowing your strengths as a coach allows these options to be considered.

It is unorthodox but as counts change, situations change. I'm surprised this doesn't happen more often.

Sunday, April 6, 2008

Catcher's signals where the whole defense can see them?

It's customary for the catcher to drop a sign for the pitcher. The pitcher nods his head and agrees or disagrees. But, quite frankly, no one else is expected to see the signs with this system.

If the shortstop or the 2B can see the signal then that would make 3 position players that would be able to notice the pitch selection. But, should every defensive player be aware of the pitch selection? Yes.

Now, the delicate part of this is "tipping" the pitches too early to the offense. You certainly wouldn't want the defense moving according to the pitch prior to the pitch being thrown. But, it would be nice if the outfielders knew if an offspeed pitch or a fastball was coming. Some teams try to signal to the outfield by having the middle infielders signal with a hand behind ther back. But, again, what if the middle infielders themselves can't see the pitch selection?

Some teams use more demonstrative signals if the pitcher can't see the catcher's signs. Why not do this all the time?

If a coach can stand down at 3B and signal to his team the offensive signals then shouldn't the catcher be able to do the same thing? I know. The pitches would be easier to steal. Well, if a team is in the practice of trying to steal pitches that might be true. The defenive team would want to focus on tough signals to crack or only use this signal package with runners in scoring position. It would limit the times the system is used and prevent the other team from cracking the code. Also, it would give the defense the advantage when it truly needs the advantage- with runners in scoring position.

Saturday, April 5, 2008

Confidence breeds concentration and relaxation

It seems simple. Coaches want their players to concentrate and relax. Confidence is the way to get this immediately. So, how do we do this?

Well, the player could certainly help the cause by playing well. Playing well promotes confidence. But, what if a player is struggling? How do you create that needed confidence that ultimately allows a player to concentrate and relax?

For one- hard work! Hard work on the practice field creates a certain entitlement to that player that makes that player feel that he deserves success. Outwork your opponent and their is a definite feeling that you belong and you have the right to have success.

The other thing that coaches can do is to put their players in positions to succeed. Take baby steps and let the player feel good about their situation before asking them to do too much. Give them a hit and run and make them swing the bat and hit the ball on the ground. Give them a sacrifice bunt and make them at least have a productive at bat. Bring that pitcher in to face the bottom of the order in a not so significant inning.

Coaches must understand how confidence affects a players performance. Now, the coach can only do so much to instill that confident feeling. But, understanding how confidence affects performance puts the coach ahead of the game.

Friday, April 4, 2008

All good hitters get jammed

The title seems very misleading. How can you get jammed and be a good hitter? Well, ultimatley you can't. You need to make consistent contact on the barrel of the bat. The statement is in comparison to the opposite of getting jammed- hitting the ball on the end of the bat.

Good hitters seldom pull off the ball so early where they hit the ball on the end of the bat.

It's quite simple. To be a good hitter you must be able to handle any pitch the pitcher throws. Now, this is a very difficut proposition. But, the best hitters do not handle 1/4, 1/3 or even 1/2 the plate. They can handle the whole plate. In order to do this, they must first be able to handle the outside corner and then adjust to the inside corner. To attempt the opposite makes hitters very vulnerable.

So, if a hitter is looking away and can't quite adjust to the ball in the hitter would be jammed.

At amateur levels of baseball it's a very easy thing to recognize when observing young players. If they are getting jammed rather than hitting the ball off the end of the bat, their flaws are at the least the best of two evils. Something to consider.

Thursday, April 3, 2008

Finish the eighth hitter off

During the course of a game you want to be especially aware of when the 8 hitter comes to bat. Retiring this hitter is one of many games within the game.

The leadoff hitter of every team is placed at the top of the order to put the most pressure on the defense. His role is one best served when he leads off an inning. By getting on base as a leadoff hitter, it not only puts pressure on the defense with team speed but it allows players hitting behind the leadoff batter to sacrifice and hit and run. This is certainly an inordinate amount of stress on the defense.

But, if that same leadoff hitter comes up with 1 out or even with a runner already on base, it could definitely mitigate the leadoffs mans ability to cause havoc.

So, the defense must be very aware of when the eighth place hitter has the chance to be the final out. By recording this out, it places the ninth hitter as the first player up in the next inning; a very important defensive strategy in attempting to win the game. Avoiding the leadoff hitter as the first batter of an inning should be a focal point of team defense.

Keep an eye on the at bats of the eighth hitter in a game. His success could literally determine a teams success by how it impacts the role of the leadoff hitter throughout the course of the game.

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

A lefthanded pitcher pitchout?

In my opinion, this should only happen in a squeeze situation. Otherwise, there would be no reason whatsoever to pitch out with a lefty on the mound.

The idea of a pitchout is to throw a runner out at 2B. When a lefty is on the mound there should be different rules that govern your decision making when it comes to whether or not you want to use the pitchout as a defensive weapon.

The pitchout is effective in that it gives the catcher a "head start" in throwing to 2B. He is allowed to set his feet up and make a strong and accurate throw by gaining some additional ground as well.

With a lefty on the mound we need to consider one of two options that the base runner must be considering. He is either going

a) on first move
or
b) after he "reads" the lefty's move.

In either case, it doesn't make sense to pitch out when a lefty is on the mound and a straight steal is suspected.

If the offensive team is going upon premise A then there is a chance that his jump will be too good anyway. It's difficult to ask a pitcher to slide step on a pitchout for fear of the runner not going alltogether. Why would we ask the pitcher to throw an intentional ball when we know that the runner is breaking as soon as he lifts his leg?

If the offensive team is stealing on "reading" the move, there is always a chance that he won't read it correctly. I wouldn't want to throw an intentional ball if I can't be guaranteed that he is running- even if I know the steal sign was given.

Another reason why the pitchout should not be considered with a lefty on the mound is because the hit and run. The pitchout is an effective tool against a hit and run. However, the hit and run is not considered a consistent threat vs. a lefty because it doesn't move the middle infielders quickly enough. So, most defensive managers abandon the idea of a team using this strategy with a lefty on the mound.

For all of these reasons, I think the lefty pitchout should not be considered in almost all 1B situations.

But, there is always the exception to the rule.

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

The Japanese baseball swing

Have you noticed a difference in the way Japanese players swing the bat? Hideki Matsui? Ichiro? Fukodomo? There is an absolute difference in the way they swing a bat and it must be cultural.

Make no mistake about it, the Japanese players invest countless hours perfecting their craft. They certainly out work their American counterparts. So, if there work is precise and calculated, then there swings are intentional by products of their cultural perspective on the baseball swing.

What do they do that is so different? Well, the naked eye can't see all differences but it appears that one major focal point is the hips role in the swing.

When American coaches stress "stay on the ball", it appears that Japanese players have a focus of generating bat speed with a dynamic core. It seems like a delicate balance of staying square to the pitcher and also clearing the hips. In order to do both, the hitter must have a great deal of flexibility and coordination. In fact, if you can visualize the swing it almost has a "running start" to it. I'm sure this momentum aspect is taught in Japanese circles.

The Japanese players that we see in the U.S are certainly the best of the best. Maybe they have amazing hand eye and succeed despite their "unorthodox" method? But, I doubt it. More likely, the Japanese players understand that bat speed is crucial and hip speed is crucial to bat speed.

I applaud the American coaches that embrace these players and allow their form to succeed. I'm sure there are plenty others that would attempt to change it. Tommy Lasorda anyone?