Why hit and run when you can steal?

I see managers or coaches outthink themselves all the time. They put a hit and run on when you could straight steal. Maybe they think that since they have the sign, they should use it. Here is the most egregious of errors.

A lefty is on the mound. Left handers are typically harder to read than a righty. If you give the hit and run sign, the runner must make sure that the pitcher goes home. In order to make sure the pitcher goes home, he must wait an extra long time at 1B. This delay prevents a decent jump and it actually prevents the middle infielders from leaving their position to cover the bag. So, now we have a runner leaving with a lousy jump and middle infielders who have yet to vacate their position. The batter is then asked to protect the runner by hitting the ball on the ground. Many, many variables must align themselves to successfully advance the runner.

On the other hand, if you simply give the straight steal, there is a better chance that 2B could be achieved. A lefty should be easy to steal on if you run on 1st lift; significantly easier than attempting to execute a difficult hit and run with multiple variables.

I have always laughed when I notice a player with the base stolen and then the batter swings and fouls the ball off. I think "Wow. What a waste of a good stolen base."

It happens much more than it should.