Thursday, January 31, 2008

The timing of the "no look" pickoff

An absolutely great way to keep a runner close at 2B is to not look at all. What?

Base stealers look for rhythm with a pitcher. Typically, pitchers throw after one look. They come set and look at the runner at 2B and then throw home. The base stealer takes advantage of this rhythm and anticipates the one look and could effectively steal during that one look. Well, if the pitcher never looks he can keep him close because a runners timing is disrupted.

But, what about attempting a pickoff after showing the no look throw home? Since the pitcher never looks at the middle infielders there must be some sort of timing that goes into the play. Absolutely there is some timing.

When the pitcher comes set, there needs to be a count that gets associated with the pitcher. As soon as the pitchers hands come to a rest the middle infielder going for the pickoff attempt counts "one thousand one" and then goes to the bag for the throw. Now, if the infielder isn't there the ball will sail into centerfield. It is imperative that the covering middle infielder be close enough to the bag so the throw can be handled easily. This involves "cheating" over to the bag as the pitcher comes set.

The no look pickoff is seldom effective without the no look pitch preceding it. In order for this to work, a great "setup" needs to occur between the pitcher and his middle infielders.

Keep a close eye on the number of looks a pitcher gives the runner at 2B. See if 0 looks is ever an option.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

1B or 2B as 1st cut on SDPT down the line

Conventional baseball thinking has the 2B and SS double as the tandem relay on Sure Double Possible Triples. However, some programs and teams use the 1B on that ball down the rightfield line. Why?

Well, the rationale for thinking along these lines is because the SS just might not be able to get to the line. If the SS is late in backing up the 1st cut, then why not have him and the 1B switch responsibilities?

In fact, one of the more documented baseball plays in recent history represents this exact topic. Derek Jeter in a playoff game against the Oakland A's. Many baseball people called the play remarkable. In actuality, it was Derek Jeter remembering where he was supposed to be on the play as the Yankees may have had the 1B be the 1st cut rather than the 2nd cut. Jeter came scrambling into the middle of the infield late to the position he was to be in from the beginning. His tardiness was recognized as very alert baseball.

Regardless of who goes out in tandem, the concept is the same. A double relay as the 1st cut and a 2nd cut around the pitchers mound. Both cuts are set up to give the defense the ability to switch the direction of the throw as quickly as possible.

If you have a chance, Youtube the Derek Jeter relay play and watch Derek get to his position late. It's an uncommon manner in which to teach this relay but professional baseball players have the time and energy to teach this. It makes sense if all involved can process it. Jeter almost didn't.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Runners on 1st and 2nd. Ground ball to the 3B.

"Whichever way it takes you." is what I yell to the 3B in this situation.

Basically, my advice here is to remind the 3B that the ball will dictate decision making. The old adage "know where you're going with the ball before it is hit to you" doesn't actually work in this situation.

If the ball is hit directly at the amateur 3B, I think I would want the 3B to go to the bag to record the 1st out. Furthermore, the ball hit to the 3B's right would also invoke a tag of the bag. Now, what if the ball takes him to his left?

If the ball takes the 3B to the 2B bag, he should feed the 2B to start the double play that way.

The other ground ball option is the ball that brings the 3B in to field it. If the 3B must leave his position and charge the ball he should expect to fire across the diamond to 1B to record the out.

"Whichever way it takes you." seems to be a prudent reminder to the 3B as to where to go with the ball.

Monday, January 28, 2008

Teaching players how to handle failure?

Baseball is a game of failure. And, if we expect our players to handle adversity shouldn't we teach them how to handle failure? I believe unequivocally yes.

Here are some examples of teaching kids how to handle failure.

1) Teach players what you expect of them on pop ups and ground outs. I'm talking about the routine variety here. It's one thing to generally say you need to hustle everything out. But, it's another thing to explicitly state I expect you to get to 1B in .2 of your fastest time always. I expect you to get to 2B on all pop ups to the outfield in 9 seconds. I also expect you to give the new batter "five" before he gets in the batters box. This requires that the guy who popped up hustles all the way into the dugout.

2) When the umpire calls a close pitch a ball we want to tell the pitcher to demand the ball back from the catcher. We don't want the pitcher to have ambiguous ways in which to react. We want to tell the pitcher exactly how to react to this unhappy experience. Another good point is to teach all the assistant coaches how you want to react to these circumstances as well.

3) One of the hardest things to do is accept a strike 3 call from the umpire. You need to teach the player how you want him to react when an umpire "wrongs" the player. A good practice is to give the player an out that he can live with that doesn't show the umpire up. If he batter thinks that he was called out wrongly he should turn away from the batters box and remove his helmet a he walks back to the dugout. Simply drop both the bat and the helmet just inside the field of play. This "irreverence" can be cathartic and it avoids the conflagration that could ensue otherwise.

There are other ways that a coach can encourage a player to handle failure. These are examples of three.

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Could you hit and run with 2 strikes?

Conventional baseball wisdom says that you don't hit and run with two strikes as you don't want the batter chasing a pitch for strike 3. Makes sense. Now, I'm not talking about a 3-2 hit and run. That isn't a true hit and run because the batter can take the pitch.

But, I contend that anytime that you accept something as gospel you neglect the "outside the box" thinking that makes people creative.

I do think there is a time and a place for a 2 strike hit and run. Let me explain.

First of all there needs to be a situation where you really want to advance a runner or it is becoming more and more likely that you believe a double play could be in order. Both of these reasons are good ones for wanting to start the runner and put on a hit and run. Remember that the original premise why you don't hit and run is because you don't want the batter chasing strike 3. So, when is there a better than average chance that he won't chase strike 3? When the pitcher needs to throw a strike.

A situation arose last year in a game where we had runners on 1st and 2nd with 0 out. Our 8 hitter was up and I really wanted a runner on 3B with 1 out. I also was fearful that he would hit into a double play. After he unsuccessfully attempted bunting I asked him to hit and run with a 2-2 count. He fouled off 3 pitches before eventually striking out. All the pitches were in the zone(strike 3 was looking) and reasonable pitches to hit and run on. The runner was also thrown out at 3B but I still contend it made sense.

Saturday, January 26, 2008

The slide step

The slide step is something the pitcher can do to slow the running game. The concept behind the slide step is the pitcher simply delivers the ball quicker to the catcher. If the catcher had the ball sooner,he would have a better chance of throwing the runner out if that runner would decide to run. So, is it something that every pitcher should use?

Not necessarily. Let's consider some things.

The slide step can definitely remove some of a pitchers effectiveness. Being quicker to the plate can have an effect on a pitchers movement as the arm doesn't have the same time to get on top of the ball. In fact, many sinker ball pitchers suffer when they try and be quicker to the plate. You don't want to compromise one's stuff just to get the ball to the catcher quicker.

Something else to consider. When you have a catcher that has a strong arm you actually want teams to try and run. If that is the case, you don't want to discourage teams from running but rather you want to encourage them. So, it's nice to show a normal time to the plate early in at bat, only to quicken the tempo in running counts. This gives the offense the illusion that the pitcher will be slow to the plate and then slide steps at a very prudent time.

Slide stepping all the time seems rational enough but it isn't always the best manner to conduct business. You need to take into consideration who is on the mound and who is behind the plate.

Friday, January 25, 2008

The advantages of a one way lead

A "one way" lead is used in baseball circles against a left handed pitcher. The idea is the base runner takes a larger lead and as the pitcher picks his leg up the base runner shuffles back to the bag shortening his lead. If the ball is thrown to 1B, the runner will be back at the bag in plenty of time. It is this early arrival that can be taken advantage of offensively.

The runner shuffles back to the bag and the ball is thrown to 1B. Rather than hurriedly scrambling to get to the bag, the runner can get to the inside edge of the bag and "anchor down" his position. This means that if the ball is thrown errantly, there is a chance the runner could prevent the ball from being caught. If the ball goes down the line, the runner could take 3B.

Another advantage of the one way lead is you get an opportunity to see what kind of pickoff move the lefthander has. Certain lefties are easier to run on than others. If we take a larger lead inviting a pickoff attempt, we get a chance to see the move. At the least, we can make an educated decision as to whether or not we should straight steal.

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Throwing "off" the plate

Every communication system between a pitcher and a catcher needs to have a signal that says " I want this ball off the plate." I like to use the terminology of a "gap" pitch. This means that the pitch is in the gap between the batters box and the plate.

When the catcher signals to the pitcher that he wants a gap fastball he is telling him that he wants an intentional ball. I believe this is a very important part of pitching. The ability to command the strike zone also includes the ability to command outside the strike zone.

When the count runs 0-2 or 1-2 in certain scenarios, you want to get the batter out by having him chase your pitch. To effectively do this, the catcher should signal to the pitcher that the ball should be thrown off the plate.

An effective way to do this is to give a signal that indicates the "gap." We use a chopping motion. I also believe it is important to signal the gap signal before the pitch. The last thing you want to do is cause the pitcher to balk because he is caught off guard after he knows what pitch he is throwing.

Call the gap, then call the pitch.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

An inside changeup?

This pitch seems as dangerous as a pitch could be. Yet, some very successful pitchers employed this pitch with much success.

What is the concept and can it be effective at the high school level?

The reason the pitch is considered dangerous in nature is because when offspeed pitches are away a hitters bat path will have already cleared the zone when swinging resulting in a miss. However, when that same pitch is on the inside corner, the bat path has a chance of catching the ball on the upswing. Potentially, this could cause a long fly ball. It is essentially the concept behind the hanging breaking ball.

Yet, the inside changeup was thrown with a modicum of some success at the big league level.

Here's why.

Elite level hitters recognize pitches quickly on past experiences. When they see the ball on the inside part of the plate they think fastball because no one would dare throw on the inside part of the plate- it contradicts convention. That's why it was so successful.

Now, at the high school level I think it's a terrible idea. High school hitters haven't had enough experience to quickly recognize pitches. High school hitters see and react rather than anticipate and look for visual cues. There is a monumental difference.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

2-2 count, ball in the dirt. CAREFUL.

So many times, instincts play a large role in how a base runner reacts. But, in many instances you need to consider the count before making an instinctual decision. Of course, the 1B coach could assist in this decision.

Here is what I'm talking about.

With 2 outs you're trying to get into scoring position. Being at 2nd base is significantly better than being at 1st base. However, if you consider the scenario presented here you're definitely better off staying at 1B.

A ball in the dirt requires the catcher to block the ball. Assuming the batter did not swing the count would then go to 3-2.

Now, we have a full count with 2 outs. Guess what? The runner will be moving and could very well score on a base hit to the outfield.

Now, I'm not suggesting it's as advantageous as being at 2B. I am suggesting that getting thrown out at 2B trying to advance on this dirtball is an egregious mistake. The 1B coach must stress how careful you need to be here. A full count on the batter would mean the runner would be moving and the batter is just one more ball away from walking anyway.

I think it's negligent for a base runner/ coach to not be aware of this scenario.

Monday, January 21, 2008

Bases Loaded 2 outs. Windup or stretch

Typically with two outs I don't care if the pitcher throws from the stretch or windup. It doesn't bother me if he is out of the windup becuase as long as the inning ends on a put out at 1B, the players secondary at 3B is insignificant. However, when there is speed at 3B you do need to be aware. I'll say this- I definitely prefer the stretch over the windup but if the pitcher is more comfortable out of the windup, I don't fight him.

However, when the bases are loaded with two outs it does bother me when a pitcher goes from the windup. Here's why.

With 2 outs and the bases are loaded, there is a distinct possibility that the count could go 3-2 and then all runners would be moving prior to the pitch. If the runners get a head start when a pitcher throws from the windup, a single could quite easily score 3 runs. Although the count won't always go full- it could. And if it could you need to weigh whether or not you think it's worth having the pitcher throw from the windup.

Again, if the pitcher is considerably more comfortable out of the windup, I'll probably let him throw out of the windup. But, like anything else, the more you know the more educated your decision will be.

This bases loaded, 3-2 count, 2 out scenario can be an absolute merry-go-round if the pitcher is throwing out of the windup.

THE FOLLOWING IS A TEST: PLEASE PARDON THE EXERCISE.

Comprehensive baseball instruction and conditioning found at - http://www.gowagsbaseball.com


So if you want to tak e a look at our baseball stuff click here. This is baseball training. It's baseball lessons and baseball conditioning. It's hitting mechanics and pitching mechanics. This is very unique sports performance. We do softball lessons for hitters with softball pitching to come.

Trust me, if you've ever wanted to improve throwing velocity or to improve bat speed, you should probably visit this baseball academy site.

The cool dudes there are Bret Wagner (don't call him Brett), Kyle Wagner (don't call him Rosco Peco Train) and Bob Gorinski (just don't...). Aw, what the heck, it's probably going to happen, so Brett Wagner.

If you don't mind, why don't you just go ahead and mention http://www.gowagsbaseball.com on your blog or site or whatever, and link some of those above words to that web address. I hear that Bill Gates and Microsoft will give you, like, $22.39 for every link you do. Yeah that check will be coming out in, like, 8 to 12 weeks.

Sunday, January 20, 2008

1st and 3rd. (Tying run at 3rd, Winning run at 1st)

You're the offensive team, late in the game. What do you do?

At low levels of amateur baseball this might not be a decision at all. Most levels below Varsity baseball would steal the runner at 1st base and create a 2nd and 3rd. But what if the arm strength exists to potentially throw the base runner out at 2nd base. If that is the case, quite the decision looms.

Let's make the situation slightly more specific. Let's say there are 2 outs and a poor hitter is up. I know there are many more contingencies to making a decision than what is presented here but, let's think about it anyway.

As an offensive coach you must think to yourself- "What will the defensive team do?" Will they attempt to throw the runner out? Will they eat the ball? Will they check the runner at 3B and then try and throw the runner out? Will they throw to 3B? Will they throw to a cutoff man? Obviously, what the offense thinks they will do should affect what the offensive does.

Here are my opinions on the scenario.

If the hitter is a poor hitter(big deal) then the offensive team probably should be proactive in making the defensive team act on the play. This means that allowing the count to develop is very dangerous. Anytime you wait until the batter gets in a hole, there is a chance he could put the ball in play very early and eliminate any trickery. With a poor hitter in the box, bad idea!

So, I believe whatever is to be done, should be done early. How about these options?

a) Balk steal. Have the runner take off early to make a pitcher react. Maybe he balks and we get the game tied and the runner into scoring position?

b) Draw a throw from the pitcher. Get an extended lead and invite a rundown between 1st and 2nd.

c) Draw a throw from the catcher with a large secondary. Same idea as above with the rundown.

d) Steal stop. Straight steal of 2B but stop short of the bag creating a rundown between 1st and 2nd. There would be a great opportunity to score that runner at 3B if the ball is thrown.

So, if this situation presents itself and I don't trust the hitter. I would definitely choose one of the above scenarios. This isn't saying that they'll work. The defense dictates everything as they hold the ball. Realistically, if any of the above plays work it's because the defense allowed them to work.

Saturday, January 19, 2008

Get to 2B with 2 outs;Get to 3B with 1 out

This heading is as basic as offensive game planning can be; yet no one seems to teach it.

It should be the fundamental rule that governs base runners and their coaches decision making processes.

The idea is pretty simple. When an opportunity presents itself to get into scoring position with 2 outs try to do it. If you fail it was worth the risk. So whether you are already at 1B an you want to attempt a straight steal with 2 outs? a delayed steal? a rhythm steal? It is the time and place to do so. If you are hitting with 2 outs and nobody on base, it is the time to think DOUBLE. We would like to be in scoring position when the next hit comes.

Now, some things can mitigate this decision. If you have a bog bat coming up behind you you may want to stay at 1B to give him a chance to drive at least someone in rather than leading off the next inning.

What about get to 3B with 1 out? The idea here is we can score on something other than a hit. Well, you can do that with 0 outs too you might say. Yes, but with 0 outs it doesn't justify the risk. There are a lot more opportunities ahead of us- at least we hope. Getting to 3B with 1 out allows us to score on ground ball putouts, sac flys and might even make the defense adjust by moving their infield in.

This thinking is prevalent among all good offensive baseball teams. It shows up in professional baseball, college baseball and high school baseball. It simply is sound fundamental baseball.

Friday, January 18, 2008

Thoughts on warming up between innings

Typically teams run out onto the field for a very brief period of time. In that time the 1B flips balls to the infielders and they return the throw. Outfielders throw to each other which often relegates one of the wing outfielders with a partner from the bench.
I'm not suggesting that what I'm about to write is a better way to do it. In fact, some people might think it's counterproductive. But, I think it does have some merit and is something to consider.

Infielders could practice double play balls. The feed and pivot is something that is certainly harder to practice than just throwing balls to 1B. Maybe if infielders had multiple balls out there they could practice their double play routine and rep the idea of "turning two."

Example: 1B throws the ball to the 3B who takes it and fires to the 2B to start a double play. 2B relays to the 1B. 1B throws to SS and the double play is started again. 1B throws to 2B and he now feeds the SS and the double play is turned. The cycle would then repeat itself.

A simple adjustment could be made that in odd innings you get one out(the normal routine) while in even innings you record two outs.

In addition, the outfielders could stretch their arms a little bit more since there throws are usually a little longer than normal. The right and left fielder could play catch while the centerfielder would throw with a bench buddy. It makes each person throw the ball significantly farther.

Thursday, January 17, 2008

The art of "going" to a relief pitcher

When it's time to take a pitcher out of the game there is an interesting way of how experienced coaches make this change. The manner in which they do this is pretty basic and very consistent. The premise is to give the pitcher some extra time to warm up.

Here is how it works.

Pitcher tires and a decision is made to go to a different pitcher. The head coach asks the catcher or another position player to go speak to the player. The player walks to the mound and takes as much time as is granted by the umpire. The umpire strolls to the mound and says "come on guys, let's play." The catcher agrees and walks back to the plate. As the catcher squats, the head coach pops his head out of the dugout and does the same routine. This time, the visit becomes an official visit. The head coach takes his time and waits as long as he can until the umpire makes that same stroll. The head coach might even use this time to voice is not so popular opinion with an umpire. Finally, at this time, a pitching change is made.

This whole process could take about 5 minutes. If you are aggressively warming up, you can get about 25 pitches in in that time.

The art of "stalling" by baseball.

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Man on 2nd only. 0 outs, 2 strikes

Does this situation invoke any thoughts from a proactive 3rd base coach. It should. It is a situation where if the batter strikes out he must run to 1st base. It is also an opportunity for the man on 2B to get to 3B if he is well instructed.

Here's how.

I like to call it a "catcher break." The catcher blocks strike 3 and must record the out. A well taught catcher should immediately move in the direction of the man on 2B. Most don't. If the catcher effectively closes down the distance between himself and the runner, executing the play becomes difficult.

As the catcher cocks his arm to throw the runner out at 1B, the runner at 2B times the throw and takes off to 3B. The combination of throws from catcher to 1B to 3B is very challenging to record the out at 3B.

The play is based in anticipation. Simply recognizing that the catcher may indeed have to make a throw a lot of times is the basis for the effectiveness of the play. Most times the runner at 2B simply goes back to 2B and the chance of advancing dies.

Expect to advance and the pressure shifts to the defense.

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

Catcher intentionally confusing offense.

Dugouts can't determine latitude of a catcher. In other words, they can't decipher where exactly he sits in the catcher's box. One thing that a catcher can do to confuse the opposition is give the impression that he is moving somewhere other than he actually is.

Here's how and why it can be important.

The location the catcher sits is very important if we're talking about same side pitcher vs. same side hitter. The reason being is that an off speed pitch is never called to an inside edge when throwing something with break. Therefore, if the opposition sees a catcher set up inside on a same side situation- A FASTBALL IT IS!

So, the way a catcher confuses the opposition is instead of calling for a pitch down the middle and moving once the pitcher prepares to throw, the catcher will set up off the middle.

For example- a righty pitching to a righty. If the catcher sets up in it appears that a fastball is on the way. So, to confuse the opposition, the catcher starts out really in and gives the signal. Then, when he moves to an inside corner position it appears that he is actually moving to an outside corner pitch. Interesting.

This ploy would only seem beneficial if the opposition is attempting to relay information. Otherwise, why bother.

Monday, January 14, 2008

Intentionally dropping strike 3?

It sounds ridiculous. Why would you want to drop strike 3?

Well. You probably wouldn't. It's absolutely counter-intuitive to think that dropping strike 3 would ever serve a constructive purpose but consider this.

Many times in amateur baseball a runners instincts are relied upon rather than sound prudent decision making. Well, here is a play that I have actually seen take place in a high school baseball game that proved costly.

A batter strikes out with a runner on 1st. There are less than two outs so the the batter is retired automatically. If you drop the 3rd strike, the batter might take off running although he is already out. Here is where the play gets interesting. If the runner on 1st doesn't really think he may take off to 2B. You have a chance at recording another out.

I've seen it before. Is it worth it? What have you got to lose?

Sunday, January 13, 2008

The mechanics of the 2B's pivot

On ground balls that the 2B is expected to be at the 2B bag, he must have a good understanding of many variables. How fast are the runners? Where was the ball hit? Were the runners in motion? These variables allow the 2B to make an educated decision about what kind of pivot he should use around the bag.

The first thing he must be aware of is actually getting to the bag. If you have bag responsibility- you need to be at the bag. In fact, a good rule of thumb is to get to an area of about 2.5 ft. radius around the bag as quickly as possible. From there you can break down and read the throw.

We're talking amateur baseball here so there is a mandatory slide rule. That is important. That means no one should be sliding in trying to take us out at 2B. If that is true, I don't need to be thinking "avoid the runner."

Get to the bag and have the hands out in front ready to be quick. As the ball approaches you want to try and keep your head to the right of the approaching ball. This allows you to stay loaded as you receive the ball. Regardless if you drag the left foot or step on the bag with your left foot you'll catch the ball while your right foot is landing. This is so you can transition to a throw much quicker.

If the ball is a tailor made double play you would suggest to all 2B to work across the bag so you can get the ball quicker and redirect it quicker. Working behind the bag just takes a little longer. Some 2B like to straddle the bag and then just drag the left foot while they are throwing. This too is ok.

Again, the pivot's technique is primarily taught to avoid injury at upper levels. As long as the slide rule is in effect, the 2B needs to get to the bag and redirect the ball quickly. The salient points there are quick hands and short quick feet. You don't want big long strides as it will force the hands to be slow also.

Saturday, January 12, 2008

1st base dugout over 3rd base dugout?

Is there any reason that one dugout would be better than another? I say yes. Here's why.

I have always suggested that I would rather have the 1st base dugout because if a batter strikes out and is not tagged out by the catcher he can casually walk towards the dugout and then sprint to 1B. Although his path was not direct, he should not be called out. A batter may advance to 1B until he steps into the dugout. If the dugout was on the 3B side, he would effectively give up his opportunity as it is behind the catcher.

Another advantage to sitting on the 1B side is you get to watch pitcher's pickoff moves on a regular basis. If you are a team that is trying to read a pitcher's pickoff move(especially a lefty) there is no substitute for seeing it. If you have the 1B dugout you could have your runners go down the line and watch as the pitcher attempts to pick the runner off of 1st. This is something that you would not be allowed to do if you were on the third base side.

Now, is it that big of a deal? No.

Could it give you an advantage? Yes. For evidence of that- please see the "around the horn" blog.

Friday, January 11, 2008

The mechanics of the fake to 3B play(corners play)

When runners get on 1st and 3rd, the right handed pitcher has a "deceiving" play that he may use. Many will admonish the play saying "I never see it work" but it certainly does have merit. The efficacy of the play is based upon some fundamental base running mistakes that are less apparent at upper levels. Therefore, it makes this play very effective at the high school level.

Here is the play.

The pitcher fakes to 3B. This is move must resemble as closely as possible the motion of a pitcher throwing home. The effectiveness of the play is based solely upon the runner at 1B thinking the pitcher is throwing home. If it appears that a pickoff might be on, the runner will not take off. Therefore, first and foremost, the pitcher must give the impression that he is throwing home despite his bluff to 3B.

Following the fake to 3B, the pitcher should very quickly turn around with his arm in position to throw. But, at the amateur level, there is a very real chance that a throw to 1B will not ensue. There is a great chance that a throw to 2B will ensue.

At the amateur level, many base runners run with their head down. At the amateur level, many base runners look at a pitcher's front foot when stealing. If a runner is guilty of both- more than likely he will be sprinting to second base in an attempt to steal 2B. The pitcher, meanwhile, has the ball in his hand. If the pitcher can make an accurate throw to the SS an out will result.

The play again hinges on some key tenets.

1) The initial fake must have deception.
2) The glance back to 1st must be quick.
3) The pitcher must turn around with the intent to throw somewhere.
4) The SS better not be daydreaming as the runner very well might be sprinting toward 2B.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

A bunt offense- read the runner at 2B?

With runners on 1st and 2nd and 0 out, the bunt comes into play. A very advanced offensive plan involves keying the runner at 2B when you square early.

Here's how it works.

The batter squares early in a 1st and 2nd bunt situation. The batter keys the runner at 2B.

The runner at 2B could either steal 3B or stay at 2B. Let's look analyze what the batter could do in these scenarios.

If the runner stays at 2B the batter could bunt the ball if...
A) the 3B stays back
B) the 3B charges but the SS doesn't rotate to 3B

If the runner stays at 2B the batter could slash if...
A) he has been given the green light to do so.
B) the wheel play is on.

If the runner takes off to 3B he must have seen an opportunity to steal 3B. The batter should take the pitch if he sees the runner stealing the bag.

This offense is a very detailed offense that requires lots of practice time. There must be a lot of continuity among the offense to attempt to pull something like this off. The offense can be scaled back if need be. You could eliminate the slash portion of the offense if you are concerned about level of difficulty.

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Mid. infielders switching coverage

Runner at 1st base takes off to steal 2B. When should a coach switch mid. infield coverage? In other words, if a righty is hitting when should he ask the SS to cover rather than the 2B?

The easy answer is if the coach suspects that a hit and run might be on. If a team has shown a tendency to hit behind runners than the coach should ask the infielders to switch coverage.

Another issue that goes into whether or not you should switch coverage is a teams propensity to go 1st to 3rd. If a team runs quite a bit and has demonstrated that it will go 1st to 3rd, it may be beneficial to have the SS cover because it may be less likely for that runner to try and get to 3B. A 2B that covers would almost guarantee a 1st to 3B single because the ball would be behind the runner in the outfield grass rather than in front.

Switching coverage is more often done with a righty hitting because when a lefty is hitting you have the SS covering for the most part. You don't want to switch coverage and create a 1st and 3rd when a single through the 6 hole would have only created a 1st and 2nd.

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

1st and 2nd bunt situation. 3B's responsibilities

The 3B is definitely burdened in this scenario. He must be in position to field a bunt if it is bunted in his direction. He must also be at the bag if the runner takes off to steal 3B. To accomplish both, the 3B will assume a general position that allows him to do both.

The 3B moves in and angles himself so he can guard against both events. The angle gives him the ability to move forward while still seeing the runner.

Now, some other interesting things that can play into the 3B's mindset. Is there a righthanded pitcher on the mound or a lefthanded pitcher on the mound?

Lefties tend to finish to the 3B side while righties tend to finish to the 1B side. This means that the 3B should account for this.

A lefty on the mound will mean that the 3B might want to consider sliding closer to the line while a righty would slide him closer to the "6 hole."

Now, once the ball is bunted it certainly depends what play is on but generally the 3B will leave to field a ball bunted in his direction. Generally, anything bunted hard at the 1B or pitcher the 3B will retreat and hold down the bag. There are many bunt packages that defenses could employ, but this is a general understanding of the bunt situation.

One last caveat, a 3B should never leave his position in a man on 2nd bunt defense. You do not want the runner stealing in behind you. An amateur mistake is to leave too early only to have a runner steal behind the 3B.

Monday, January 7, 2008

Double play depth-always?

Runner on 1st and less than two outs. Do we always go to double play depth?

Naturally, players will think "turn two" and put themselves in a situation that allows themselves to turn a double play.

However, what if the prudent play isn't to be in double play depth? Let me explain.

You have a 4-1 lead and it's the last inning. Sure it would be nice to turn a double play but it would also be nice to record outs and walk away with a win. Let's presume that a batter is up that charts say hits the ball in the "6 hole". Do you put your shortstop up the middle and take him away from the batters strength? I suggest that the prudent decision in this case would be to shade the SS into the hole and play for at least one out. If the batter hits the ball to the right side, there stands a very good chance that there would be no play at 2B. But, by playing the percentages of the chart you allow your defense a chance to record at least one very important out.

What other factors determine where the SS should play?

Certainly, the kind of pitcher that is on the mound would have a great deal of say into where your infielders should be located. Off speed pitchers would be more conducive to shading the shortstop to the 6 hole.

One last point of interest.

You could certainly move the middle infielders in tandem. This would keep the double play in order in most cases. But, it needs to be weighed with the idea of a possible bunt. You don't want your 2B too far over to 2B making the push bunt a very attractive option. Furthermore, if a bunt is layed down and the 1B is forced to field the ball the 2B does have bag responsibility.

Just another baseball play to consider.

Sunday, January 6, 2008

ABCA Convention

I just recently had the privilege to attend the American Baseball Coaches Association Convention in Philadelphia. It was extremely well organized and was by all accounts an overwhelming success. From the clinicians to the exhibits to the banter outside the lecture rooms I would contend that any baseball coach anywhere would find the weekend experience beneficial. However, I need to write about some lasting impressions.

Here are my five lasting impressions:

1) Most men are balding.
2) I know why I thoroughly enjoyed competing against Mike Martin.
3) The baseball swing is not fully understood by anyone.
4) I know why my brother speaks so highly of John Anderson.
5) High School Baseball Coaches are being neglected.

1- It's amazing how hard it is to locate one bald friend in a Convention Center attended by only men. I think having hair as a 30+ man is the exception rather than the rule.

2- Mike Martin enjoys baseball. He enjoys competing against other baseball people. He enjoys all that the game offers and his approach was refreshing to me as a player at Wake Forest and it's even more refreshing as a coach watching him share. Mike Martin is "old school" in his approach but it appears he's "new school" in philosophies. I guess a sense of humor is good at transcending time.

3- Hitting a baseball is widely recognized as the single hardest thing to do in sports. To this recognition, we constantly have coaches standing up and presenting to wide eyed coaches the secrets to the swing. Invariably, though, a new clinician will emerge the following year and present new information and coaches will frantically copy down their theories to hitting. I think the average high school coach would do well to steer clear of advice and simply allow a players natural athleticism take over. I have heard many coaches offer advice that another coach will contradict. With respect to hitting, I believe it's safe to say "the more you know, the less sure you are."

Having said that, I wonder why I have never heard hitting coach address the idea of handedness. I have always contended that a righty thrower who hits from the right side will have different tendencies than a lefty thrower that hits from the right side.

Also, I am still waiting on the hitting instructor who begins with the "contact point" in mind. Every one always starts at the beginning. My humble opinion believes that if coaches don't comprehend how valuable that moment in time is where ball meets bat nothing else matters.

4- To me it seems like John Anderson gets it. He understands that motivating a player and a players emotions matter far more than a players ability. His topic that he spoke on wasn't the most highly attended session. It didn't address bunt defenses or 1st and 3rd offenses or hitting the breaking ball. But, it may have been the most important session of the weekend. His five tenets of truth will stick with me. Respect, Responsibility, Honesty, Fairness, and Compassion. Without trust, who cares if you know how to teach the swing.

5- High School Coaches are not getting the message that they need to receive. I'd like to go into detail with this last impression.

Without knowing exactly what percentage of coaches in attendance are high school coaches it makes this argument slightly more specious. However, suffice it to say the percentage probably looms around the 70-80% mark. That means that at the least 7 out of every ten paying customers are high school coaches looking to improve their program. They come to this awesome confluence of knowledge hoping to implement what they learn. Their aspirations are noble and their desire to improve are exemplary. But, they don't receive what they need.

Let me begin by saying in order to improve as a coach, the ideas and information that you believe in must be conferred to your players. It is never enough to simply know something or believe in something. Rather, you must be able to implement something. There are thousands of teachers nationwide that fail not on what they know but rather on what they fail to communicate. It is the sole reason why coaches become "expert" coaches. They are recognized by their peers based upon the success that their players have. No one cares what a coach knows if he can't transfer that knowledge to his players. Therefore, the absolute most important thing that a high school coach must hear is HOW TO IMPLEMENT THIS KNOWLEDGE. This is distinctly different than the message of HERE IS HOW WE(THE COLLEGE COACH) DO IT.

High school cultures are so different than college cultures that attempting to do similar things can be tantamount to organizational chaos. I listened to most of the speakers and no one addressed the constraints that mitigate high school programs. In fact, high school coaches themselves don't even recognize this disconnect. They phrase their questions in the form of "How do you.." rather than "How can I..."

I'd like to list the cultural differences here and how they affect high school programs.

1) TIME AND WEATHER.

College coaches simply have more TIME at their disposal than high school coaches. Many of the video clips that were shown to a high school coach were documented in a college's fall practice. High school coaches don't have a fall practice to implement their system. High School coaches have a spring practice. Furthermore, the beginning of spring practices are very cold. Any time used to implement something new is very difficult in cold weather. The players(and coaches for that matter) would much rather do something fast paced than be instructed on something new.

So, what's the secret to implementing something new at the high school level? You have to make the time. How? I believe the answer can be two fold. The first option is have winter workouts. You can certainly implement most of what you want to do inside. But, what if your whole team isn't there? I believe the answer lies in technology. Our players today all have access to computers and other tech devices. They are learning at a rate never before seen. They just aren't learning baseball. High school coaches need to create DVD's demonstrating their new techniques to their kids. These DVD's can be viewed at a player's leisure or in a teacher's classroom if the coach happens to be in the building. It's a huge time saver. Quite honestly, it's the best way to expect information to be disseminated. It's a major time commitment to prepare the first DVD but it certainly saves time in the long run.

2) COACHES.

College coaches have great baseball resumes. The head coach is obviously an accomplished baseball guy. The assistants undoubtedly played college baseball. And, if they are fortunate enough there is a graduate assistant available.

High schools are much more limited. A head baseball coach must first and foremost be willing to teach his assistants what he wants implemented. It's naive to think one man can teach everything to everybody. In order to implement something new, all coaches need to be on the same page. This means that numerous meetings must be scheduled before the season and all details ironed out.

3) 4 YEARS VS. 2 YEARS

College baseball programs revolve around a 4 year cycle. HIgh school baseball programs sometimes have a 2 year mentality. This means that some programs run their Varsity and JV programs autonomously. This would have to change. In order to utilize the teaching resources of your upperclassmen you must have freshmen exposed to the seniors. If this isn't done in a high school program, I find it inexcusable.

But, if this is done, you need to be a master at organizing practices. High school programs can have upwards of over 45 players. This requires tremendous organizational and management skills. Team managers are essential at helping with practice organization.

4) ONE SPORT VS. MULTI-SPORT

College teams have one sport players(for the most part). Certainly, that could exist for the high school team as well. But, it is certainly more reasonable to expect that a high school player is a multi-sport athlete. How does this affect what you teach? If you are choosing to educate your players before the season on a concept that requires much understanding, you must find time to talk to these players. Whether it be face to face or in the form of a DVD, you must present the new material to your players before the spring season is under way.

If you are interested in preparing a pre-season training program you need to have the ability to be flexible with this athlete. In fact, playing another sport is a great way to create a high stress environment for your baseball players. More than anything you probably need to relax and allow that player to finish his sport. This does, however, have an impact on your teaching practices that colleges don't really have to deal with.

5) PARENTS

College coaches don't have parent issues for the most part. There are the obvious groans but nothing as insidious as high school parents can be. Many times, parents alone can be the reason that an idea isn't embraced by the player. Dismissing parents as unimportant is ignoring the big white elephant in the room. Parents need to be included. They need to be kept abreast of changes in the program and of any issues that could impact their kids. I have found that a newsletter is an excellent way to communicate with parents. I have also found that amazingly parents volunteer their time and resources when they feel like they are involved.

6) SKILL LEVEL

High school baseball players simply can't do what their college contemporaries can. I watched coaches speak about how to defend 1st and 3rd defenses and I couldn't help but thinking "we'll defeat most every high school team that would do this" because high school athletes don't have the arm strength. Many of the plays demanded of a college team should flat out be dismissed in the high school realm. High school coaches need to hear what TV viewers sometimes hear "actors are trained professionals. Please do not try this at home."

The ABCA convention is a tremendous event that is designed with the baseball coach in mind. It attempts to address how to best impact coaches nationwide.

From my viewpoint, there needs to be a high school coaches session where someone discusses our culture and how it is different than the college culture. To that end, the high school coach must understand what might need to change first in order to adapt some more esoteric college perspectives.

Whew!

Saturday, January 5, 2008

1st and 3rd catcher peek?

All teams practice their 1st and 3rd defenses. My question- should the catcher take a peek at the runner at 3B to check whether or not he is going?

As a former catcher I am well aware of how difficult it is to throw a runner out at 2B by simply coming up and throwing as quickly as possible. So, how is a catcher supposed to throw a runner out at 2B after first taking a peek. Well, it is in fact possible if a couple details are understood.

A runner at 1B should not be able to get his normal jump with a right handed pitcher because of the fake to third move that is available to him. If the runner at 1st is aware of this move it should create enough of a time lapse that a catcher would be allowed to check the runner at 3B before throwing. However, I would contend that most base stealers are not accounting for that move. If that is the case, you absolutely can not check the runner at 3B.

So, should a catcher check a runner at 3B before throwing?

I would answer like this.

A) If you as a defense believe in always checking the lead runner in a 1st and 3rd, you better also believe in the fake to third back to first play.

B) If you as a defense don't think you can check because runners that are running don't delay their read, you better have a pre=determined read that you're defense is aware of. You simply can not attack both the runner at 1st and the runner at 3B if you think runners at 1st are trying to get the best jumps possible.

Friday, January 4, 2008

The 3-0 steal at 1st base.

Why in the world would you choose to steal in a 3-0 count? In one more pitch you're going to be at 2B.

Not so fast.

What if the pitcher throws a strike. Now, it's 3-1 and you are at 2B. But, the question still remains. Is it a prudent time to steal 2B.

Well, not really. Unless, the pitcher is pitching in such a rhythm that there is no doubt in your mind that you can make the bag. You would have to think that no one would expect a runner to steal on this count. In fact, I've only seen it done twice and both times I thought "that was stupid." But, upon further review- maybe not.

If a runner can move into scoring position with certainty. Why not?

Now, the batter has a 3-1 count and is hitting with a man in scoring position. Maybe he walks on a 3-1 pitch. Or, maybe he singles.

The concept is certainly brazen and bold but I don't think it should be dismissed.

I'll close with this. If you as a coach give the steal sign "you're crazy." The 3-0 steal should be from an experienced base runner that has the green light and recognizes pitcher's tendencies.

I don't think you can ask a player with little running experience to do this.

Pay attention. See if you notice a 3-0 steal. It's certainly a four-leaf clover of baseball.

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Intentionally throwing at a batter

Is there a place for this in amateur baseball?

Wow. What a difficult question to answer. This isn't professional baseball where players have millions of dollars at stake with their careers. This is amateur baseball where it's just one's ego at stake.

Now, during the heat of the battle when a player feels wronged he may resort to a strategy that is so often played out on TV-retaliate by throwing at the batter!

I believe amateur baseball should be immune from this kind of behavior. But, as long as amateurs pretend that they're professionals I think the "beanball" will be a part of baseball.

I would hope that no coach would ask a player to intentionally throw at another player. Quite simply, it would be a recipe for disaster. Amateur players that can't control the strike zone certainly don't want to be throwing at a players torso. If you miss the inside corner you may catch the heart of the plate. If you miss the torso, you may hit the "coconut."

Just one coach's opinion.

Wednesday, January 2, 2008

Man on 1st. Comebacker to the mound < 2 outs.

Ball gets hit back to the pitcher with runner on 1st. A double play is a posssibility. What should the middle infielders do?

I have heard of some schools that suggest you should not communicate coverage prior to the pitch but I believe it is good to remind the pitcher that a force exists at 2B. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the pitcher should turn and recognize either the SS or the 2B as to who will be at the bag prior to delivering the ball.

If the pitcher does get a comebacker, he needs to turn and throw to a covering middle infielder. Who is at the bag should have already been established but in the heat of the moment sometimes things get complicated. So, what should the infielders do?

I believe that the middle infielders should work in conjunction. One guy covers and the other guy simply points in the direction of the base. The last thing you want is a second middle infielder converging on 2B only to confuse the pitcher.

Some coaches will suggest that the middle infielder should back up the play but I would contend "What is the centerfielder doing?"

See if you can watch the next time a routine comebacker to the mound happens. Notice the actions of the middle guys and I would be curious as to what method they employ.

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

A play at the plate. Mask on or off?

When a play evolves where it appears there will be a play at the plate, the catcher needs to make a basic decision. Mask on or off?

Actually the answer to this question basically lies in the league that you are playing in.

In amateur baseball where the player approaching home plate is required to slide, I see absolutely no reason why the mask should remain on. It seems so natural to remove the mask and field a ball with ones vision unimpaired.

However, if you're playing professional baseball you learn quickly to leave your catcher's mask on.

I have two fake teeth as a testimony for understanding this principle.